Re: Remove debug echo

2011-11-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best wrote: >> On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best wrote: >>> > On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote: >>> >> kill it. >>> >> >>> >> Warner >>

Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?

2011-11-30 Thread Milan Obuch
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300 Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov > > wrote: > >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch > >> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE co

Re: Remove debug echo

2011-11-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best wrote: >> > On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> kill it. >> >> >> >> Warner >> >> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >> >> >> >>

Re: Remove debug echo

2011-11-30 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > > On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote: > >> kill it. > >> > >> Warner > >> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > >> > Any objections to this?  It removes a weird line during 'make -

Re: Remove debug echo

2011-11-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote: >> kill it. >> >> Warner >> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >> >> > Any objections to this?  It removes a weird line during 'make -s >> > buildworld' >> > output and I think it was debug

Re: Remove debug echo

2011-11-30 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote: > kill it. > > Warner > On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Any objections to this? It removes a weird line during 'make -s > > buildworld' > > output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by > > Warner: > > > > In

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-11-30 Thread Sevan / Venture37
On 30/11/2011 16:03, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: system breaks if you try to add dtrace support to a system built with profile support. sorry, I meant *without* profile support. Sevan ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.

Re: Console Spam: acpi_tz0: _TMP value is absurd, ignored (-73.0C)

2011-11-30 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 06:40 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 01/12/2011 01:22 Sean Bruno said the following: > > I have a Shuttle based intel box that appears to have some pretty > > bad ACPI implementation. Is there a good way to quiesce this > > spam? > > Ask on acpi@ list. > Kidding :-) or

Re: Console Spam: acpi_tz0: _TMP value is absurd, ignored (-73.0C)

2011-11-30 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 01/12/2011 01:22 Sean Bruno said the following: > I have a Shuttle based intel box that appears to have some pretty bad > ACPI implementation. Is there a good way to quiesce this spam? Ask on acpi@ list. Kidding :-) or not. Try hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate=0. > The console fills up with repea

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-11-30 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 01/12/2011 01:27 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > On Wednesday 30 November 2011 06:07 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following: Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here.

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-11-30 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 06:07 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following: > > > Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here. > > > Can't help with patch, stuck with pre Nov 15 CU

Console Spam: acpi_tz0: _TMP value is absurd, ignored (-73.0C)

2011-11-30 Thread Sean Bruno
I have a Shuttle based intel box that appears to have some pretty bad ACPI implementation. Is there a good way to quiesce this spam? The console fills up with repeated warnings that never cease. FreeBSD testbox 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r228164S: Wed Nov 30 16:19:16 PST 2011 sbruno@tes

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-11-30 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following: > > Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here. > > Can't help with patch, stuck with pre Nov 15 CURRENT myself. > > on 27/11/2011 19:09 Alan Cox said the following:

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-11-30 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following: > Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here. Can't help > with patch, stuck with pre Nov 15 CURRENT myself. on 27/11/2011 19:09 Alan Cox said the following: > vm_page_alloc_contig() should be used instead. My take on the patc

[CFT] pkgng alpha2

2011-11-30 Thread Julien Laffaye
Hi all, We are releasing pkgng (the next pkg_install) alpha2 to the world and we want you to test it! There is no "good" method to test it: use it as you would in the real world. Of course, you are encouraged to backup your data or test it in some kind of virtualized environment. After using it

Re: if_bce tx / rx tick limits

2011-11-30 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 03:22:37PM +0100, Florian Wilkemeyer wrote: > Hi, > > i wonder about the bce driver's tx / rx tick limits > (ticks and ticks_int are limited to 100; otherwise default value (80) > gets used) > > (if_bce.c line 921 / 933 .. ) > I think this highly depends on firmware of

Re: [patch] turning devctl into a "multiple openable" device

2011-11-30 Thread Olivier Houchard
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:04:50PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > I wonder why the waiting_threads stuff is needed at all. The cv could > > > be woken up unconditionally everytime. What is the reason for the cv_wait > > > call in cdevpriv data destructor ? You cannot have a thread doing e.g. >

Re: [patch] turning devctl into a "multiple openable" device

2011-11-30 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 13:43:20 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > With the help of cognet, I wrote a patch to turn devctl into a multiple > openable device, that mean that it will allow to open /dev/devctl in > multiple programs, for example hald and everythings that want to receive >

Re: man ugen error

2011-11-30 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 11:24:39 Thomas Mueller wrote: > According to ugen man page, ugen can be compiled into the kernel with > device ugen > in config file. > > I tried that in the kernel config when upgrading from FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 to > RC2, but the kernel build stopped quickly with the mes

Re: [patch] turning devctl into a "multiple openable" device

2011-11-30 Thread Olivier Houchard
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:46:36PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:05:11AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:43:20 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > With the help of cognet, I wrote a patch to turn devctl into a multipl

Re: [patch] turning devctl into a "multiple openable" device

2011-11-30 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 04:55:21PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:46:36PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:05:11AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:43:20 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > >

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-11-30 Thread Sevan / Venture37
On 30/11/2011 01:16, Doug Barton wrote: What does dtrace have to do with profiled libs? system breaks if you try to add dtrace support to a system built with profile support. on the other hand it could be argued that the system currently needs to be rebuilt anyway. Sevan __

Re: [patch] turning devctl into a "multiple openable" device

2011-11-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:46:36PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:05:11AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:43:20 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > With the help of cognet, I wrote a patch to turn devctl into a multipl

Re: [patch] turning devctl into a "multiple openable" device

2011-11-30 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:05:11AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:43:20 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > With the help of cognet, I wrote a patch to turn devctl into a multiple > > openable > > device, that mean that it will allow to open /dev/devct

Re: [patch] turning devctl into a "multiple openable" device

2011-11-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:05:11AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:43:20 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > With the help of cognet, I wrote a patch to turn devctl into a multiple > > openable > > device, that mean that it will allow to open /dev/devct

Re: [patch] turning devctl into a "multiple openable" device

2011-11-30 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:43:20 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > With the help of cognet, I wrote a patch to turn devctl into a multiple > openable > device, that mean that it will allow to open /dev/devctl in multiple programs, > for example hald and everythings that want to re

Re: if_clone.c allows creating multiple interfaces with the same name

2011-11-30 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 9:28:42 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Daan, > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:07:13AM +0100, Daan Vreeken wrote: > D> Thanks for the looking into this and for your quick commit. I like your > twist > D> on the patch with the move from the unit bitmap to allocating unit nu

if_bce tx / rx tick limits

2011-11-30 Thread Florian Wilkemeyer
Hi, i wonder about the bce driver's tx / rx tick limits (ticks and ticks_int are limited to 100; otherwise default value (80) gets used) (if_bce.c line 921 / 933 .. ) On DragonFly BSD the values can be set much higher (such as 1000 ..) which would be great in a high-traffic setup. (On linux

[patch] turning devctl into a "multiple openable" device

2011-11-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, With the help of cognet, I wrote a patch to turn devctl into a multiple openable device, that mean that it will allow to open /dev/devctl in multiple programs, for example hald and everythings that want to receive notification from the device won't need to depend on haveing devd running.

[SOLVED]: HW defect (was: Re: [amd64] Reproducible cold boot failure (reboot succeeds) in -CURRENT)

2011-11-30 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 17.11.2011 17:33, schrieb John Baldwin: > On Thursday, November 17, 2011 3:59:43 am Stefan Esser wrote: >> Am 16.11.2011 17:16, schrieb John Baldwin: [...] >>> That isn't unusual. Those are the addresses of the metadata provided by >>> the >>> loader, not the base address of the kernel or zfs

man ugen error

2011-11-30 Thread Thomas Mueller
According to ugen man page, ugen can be compiled into the kernel with device ugen in config file. I tried that in the kernel config when upgrading from FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 to RC2, but the kernel build stopped quickly with the message that ugen was not valid. After removing that line from kernel con