On Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:16:57 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 18. Oct 2011, at 20:00 , Johann Hugo wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The only way that I can get bfe0 to enable ACCEPT_RTADV is to manually do
> > it with ifconfig bfe0 inet6 accept_rtadv. Even if I add it to
> > ifconfig_bge0 in rc.conf it
TB --- 2011-10-19 05:26:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 05:26:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-10-19 05:26:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 05:26:04 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 05:26:04 - /usr
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:01 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:08 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:01 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:08 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:01 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 04:40:08 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:55:33 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:55:33 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:55:33 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:55:38 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:55:38 - /usr
when I digged the a PR(bin/160275), I found in_proto.c and
if_ethersubr.c ( see sys/conf/files ) does not get
${NORMAL_CTFCONVERT} post-processing in Makefile
(/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL/Makefile) generated by config(8), so
the objs does not contain ctf section
In /usr/src/usr.sbin/config/mkmak
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:07 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:07 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:07 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:07 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:07 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 01:10:07 - /usr/bin/c
On 19/10/2011 08:16, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 18. Oct 2011, at 20:00 , Johann Hugo wrote:
Hi
The only way that I can get bfe0 to enable ACCEPT_RTADV is to manually do it
with ifconfig bfe0 inet6 accept_rtadv. Even if I add it to ifconfig_bge0 in
rc.conf it does nothing.
grep bfe /etc/rc.conf
TB --- 2011-10-18 22:26:44 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-18 22:26:44 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-10-18 22:26:44 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-18 22:26:58 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-18 22:26:58 - /usr
In NetBSD has been some PaX feature [0] implemented. (ASLR, W^X
(~nxstack), mprotect restriction, veriexec, mmap randomization[2]...)
[0] http://pax.grsecurity.net/docs/index.html
[1] http://www.netbsd.org/~elad/recent/man/security.8.html
[2] http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/testing/stackgap-20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/18/11 15:07, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Hideki Yamamoto wrote in
> :
>
> hy> Hi, hy> hy> Does someone know where is the draft of FreeBSD
> 9.0 release note? hy> I would like to check if there is a
> description about new functions hy> about MLDv2 i
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:41:04 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:41:04 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:41:05 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:41:05 - /usr/bin/c
Hi,
2011/10/18 Kostik Belousov :
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:06:27PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Oliver Pinter
>> wrote:
>> > On 10/18/11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Garrett Cooper
>> >> wrote:
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:40:33 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-18 21:40:33 - /usr/bin/c
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Hideki Yamamoto wrote
> in :
>
> hy> Hi,
> hy>
> hy> Does someone know where is the draft of FreeBSD 9.0 release note?
> hy> I would like to check if there is a description about new functions
> hy> about MLDv2 is included or not.
> hy> I thi
Hideki Yamamoto wrote
in :
hy> Hi,
hy>
hy> Does someone know where is the draft of FreeBSD 9.0 release note?
hy> I would like to check if there is a description about new functions
hy> about MLDv2 is included or not.
hy> I think the below feature should be included in the release note as
hy> IP
Hi,
Does someone know where is the draft of FreeBSD 9.0 release note?
I would like to check if there is a description about new functions
about MLDv2 is included or not.
I think the below feature should be included in the release note as
IPv6 network is getting popular.
--
On 18. Oct 2011, at 20:00 , Johann Hugo wrote:
> Hi
>
> The only way that I can get bfe0 to enable ACCEPT_RTADV is to manually do it
> with ifconfig bfe0 inet6 accept_rtadv. Even if I add it to ifconfig_bge0 in
> rc.conf it does nothing.
>
> grep bfe /etc/rc.conf
> ifconfig_bfe0="DHCP accept
Hi
The only way that I can get bfe0 to enable ACCEPT_RTADV is to manually do it
with ifconfig bfe0 inet6 accept_rtadv. Even if I add it to ifconfig_bge0 in
rc.conf it does nothing.
grep bfe /etc/rc.conf
ifconfig_bfe0="DHCP accept_rtadv"
ifconfig bfe0
bfe0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
Florian Wilkemeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
> wrote:
> > On 18. Oct 2011, at 15:38 , Florian Wilkemeyer wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> i recently switched a router in our test-environment to FreeBSD 9.0-Beta=
> 3
> >> (and after things didnt worked ... checked out
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:06:27PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> > On 10/18/11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Garrett Cooper
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrot
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> On 10/18/11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Kostik Belousov
wrote
On 10/18/11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Kostik Belousov
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrot
On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:26 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Kostik Belousov
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +0200
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
wrote:
> On 18. Oct 2011, at 15:38 , Florian Wilkemeyer wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> i recently switched a router in our test-environment to FreeBSD 9.0-Beta3
>> (and after things didnt worked ... checked out the current RELENG_9
>> and recompiled kernel
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Kostik Belousov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
Hi all!
I think, it's the
Hello,
i recently switched a router in our test-environment to FreeBSD 9.0-Beta3
(and after things didnt worked ... checked out the current RELENG_9
and recompiled kernel & world .. )
Problem:
After 5 - 15 minutes NAT stops working (normal routing still works.)
Network Utilization: about 40
On 18. Oct 2011, at 15:38 , Florian Wilkemeyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i recently switched a router in our test-environment to FreeBSD 9.0-Beta3
> (and after things didnt worked ... checked out the current RELENG_9
> and recompiled kernel & world .. )
freebsd-pf archives might be a good start and th
on 14/10/2011 18:54 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
> Andry Gapon wrote:
>> Simple: revert to the previous behavior. If a user enters incorrect device
>> name
>> (i.e. root mounting fails), then return back to the prompt instead of
>> panicing.
> That should do the job.
>
> - Arnaud
>
> --
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
Hi all!
I think, it's the time to enable the nxstack feature. Any comments,
pros, cons?
I dragged the change long enough fo
Hi.
Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:14:56PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> Errr... Replying to myself... Ping? Should I file a PR and put it
> in the back burner? :)
Sorry for not replying, I wasn't home to look on it closely.
>> In the view of upcoming RELEASE-9.0 I should ha
On Oct 17, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Romain Garbage wrote:
>>
>> According to bsdtar(1) manpage, tar has a --gname switch that permits
>> to set an arbitrary groupname in the tar archive, but:
>> $ tar -cf foo.tar --gname root bar
>> tar: Option --gname is not
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I think, it's the time to enable the nxstack feature. Any comments,
>> pros, cons?
>
> I dragged the change long enough for it to miss the 9.0.
> After the
on 18/10/2011 13:35 Henri Hennebert said the following:
> I upgrade another system to 9.0-RC1 and encounter the same problem, this time
> zfsloader do not run.
>
> After
>
> mv /mnt/boot /mnt/Boot
> mkdir /mnt/boot
> cd /mnt/Boot
> find . | cpio -pvdmu /mnt/boot
>
> FreeBSD boot OK
>
>
> [root
- Original Message -
From: "Alexey Shuvaev"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: Panics after AHCI timeouts
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 06:19:19AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 18 October 2011 03:00, Alexey Shuvaev
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:14:56PM +0200
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 06:19:19AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 18 October 2011 03:00, Alexey Shuvaev
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:14:56PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> >> Hello list!
> >>
> > Errr... Replying to myself... Ping? Should I file a PR and put it
> > in the back burner?
on 17/10/2011 23:01 Alexander Best said the following:
> hi there,
>
> any thoughts regarding this change? with the ata subsystem dying, linking to
> /dev/acd isn't really necessary any more. also a lot of ports nowadays depend
> on /dev/dvd.
IMO, go for it.
--
Andriy Gapon
Hi,
as a result of a make buildkernel && make installkernel && reboot all on NFS I
got this with a HEAD SVN source at r226465. I cannot dump unfortunately and it
seems I just killed the obj tree for this kernel though it should be very close.
Oct 18 10:03:22 lion3 reboot: rebooted by test
Oct
On 10/06/2011 15:36, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 06/10/2011 15:30 Henri Hennebert said the following:
The pool is a mirror:
[root@morzine ~]# zpool status rpool
pool: rpool
state: ONLINE
scan: scrub repaired 0 in 1h0m with 0 errors on Wed Aug 24 15:04:36 2011
config:
NAME
Looks good to me.
On 10/18/11, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I think, it's the time to enable the nxstack feature. Any comments,
>> pros, cons?
>
> I dragged the change long enough for it to miss the 9.0.
> After the 9.0 i
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:17:46 +0800
Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> That sounds logical to me. Maybe getting it done before 9.0-RELEASE
>> is a bit rushed?
>>
>> I can help you test out the flash side of things on my atheros SoC
>> boards.
>>
>>
>> Adrian
More thinking give me a better way t
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:02:42AM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:39:24AM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I have upgraded my desktop from 8.2-stable to 9.0-RC1 (from source), using
> > a GENERIC kernel. I have installed the smartmontools-5.41_3 package from
> > a m
Op di 18 okt 2011 09:39:24 schreef John Hay:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have upgraded my desktop from 8.2-stable to 9.0-RC1 (from source), using
> a GENERIC kernel. I have installed the smartmontools-5.41_3 package from
> a mirror and found that smartmontools does not like the ada devices anymore.
> Previou
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I think, it's the time to enable the nxstack feature. Any comments,
> pros, cons?
I dragged the change long enough for it to miss the 9.0.
After the 9.0 is released, I will flip the switch with the following
change.
dif
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:39:24AM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have upgraded my desktop from 8.2-stable to 9.0-RC1 (from source), using
> a GENERIC kernel. I have installed the smartmontools-5.41_3 package from
> a mirror and found that smartmontools does not like the ada devices anymo
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:29:38AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:54:36 +0100
> > Anton Shterenlikht said:
>
> mexas> On r225932 with
>
> mexas> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2
> mexas> SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS+= -L/usr/local/lib
> mexas> SE
Hi Guys,
I have upgraded my desktop from 8.2-stable to 9.0-RC1 (from source), using
a GENERIC kernel. I have installed the smartmontools-5.41_3 package from
a mirror and found that smartmontools does not like the ada devices anymore.
Previously (8.2) I had a GENERIC kernel, with ahci loaded in loa
51 matches
Mail list logo
