On 10/10/11 03:18, Manfred Antar wrote:
At 11:57 AM 10/9/2011, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:48:46 -0700
Manfred Antar wrote:
Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current.
I was having same problem with gcc45 , then i rebuilt binutils with
uname_r 9.0-C
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 18:18:13 -0700
Manfred Antar wrote:
> At 11:57 AM 10/9/2011, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> >On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:48:46 -0700
> >Manfred Antar wrote:
> >
> >> Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current.
> >> I was having same problem with gcc45 , then i
On Oct 9, 2011, at 6:18 PM, Manfred Antar wrote:
> At 11:57 AM 10/9/2011, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
>> On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:48:46 -0700
>> Manfred Antar wrote:
>>
>>> Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current.
>>> I was having same problem with gcc45 , then i rebuilt b
- Miroslav Lachman's Original Message -
> Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> >Hello, Miroslav.
> >You wrote 6 ?? 2011 ??., 16:59:19:
>
> [...]
>
> >>The current state is simply wrong, because user can do something what
> >>cannot work and is not documented anywhere.
> > It is Ok in UN
At 11:57 AM 10/9/2011, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
>On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:48:46 -0700
>Manfred Antar wrote:
>
>> Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current.
>> I was having same problem with gcc45 , then i rebuilt binutils with
>> uname_r 9.0-Current and it went away.
>
>Actu
On Sat, October 8, 2011 18:28, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Greg Miller wrote:
>> On 10/8/11, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>>> as recently had issues in this regard, to install it can I just use
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/desktop-browsers.html or there is
another gui
On Sat, October 8, 2011 20:03, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 14:53, Warren Block wrote:
>> nspluginwrapper needs to be run as the end user.
>
> The pkg-message tells them to do that.
ops, haven't seen it though. all the ports cleaned by the "clean" part of
the command got on my way :(
thank
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:48:46 -0700
Manfred Antar wrote:
> Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current.
> I was having same problem with gcc45 , then i rebuilt binutils with
> uname_r 9.0-Current and it went away.
Actually, binutils built just fine for me just now without se
I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lsof not compiling with clang. I had
Vic Abell check it out, and the problem is NOT with lsof per se, but
with the system headers.
Is there a project afoot to update the system headers to make them clang
compilable?
Output below.
Hi,
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:48:52 -0700
> Doug Barton said:
dougb> In case anyone wants to take this on, this port fails to install on 10.0
dougb> because it uses its own version of libtool. I took a quick look but
dougb> there wasn't a solution obvious enough for me. :)
I didn't have
On 10/09/11 11:48, Manfred Antar wrote:
Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current.
I was having same problem with gcc45 , then i rebuilt binutils with uname_r
9.0-Current and it went away.
The most recent update to gcc46 also missed the shared library version
bump of
At 05:23 AM 10/9/2011, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>Since the change of one of my boxes to FreeBSD 10.0 and some
>accindetally build of ports without the suggested settings for UNAME_r
>before building ports, I think I've messed up with some ports and need
>some advice how to fixate the problem.
>
>Some de
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Miroslav.
You wrote 6 октября 2011 г., 16:59:19:
[...]
The current state is simply wrong, because user can do something what
cannot work and is not documented anywhere.
It is Ok in UNIX way, in general. You should be able to shoot your
leg, it is good :)
the wiki DTrace (http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace) is available and
enough for being a HOWTO.
2011/10/9 Adrian Chadd
>
> Hi,
>
> the subject says it all - does anyone have a step by step howto for
> doing userland and kernel dtrace on 9.0?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Adrian
>
Since the change of one of my boxes to FreeBSD 10.0 and some
accindetally build of ports without the suggested settings for UNAME_r
before building ports, I think I've messed up with some ports and need
some advice how to fixate the problem.
Some develish motivation drove me today building gcc46/g
Hi,
the subject says it all - does anyone have a step by step howto for
doing userland and kernel dtrace on 9.0?
Thanks,
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send
Oh, I wasn't suggesting reverting bsdinstall before 9.0. That'll make
it a bit annoying to install on USB flash drives for some devices.
It may be worthwhile to do at a later date though. I do find myself
doing USB 9.0 installs just to test out the release without destroying
a physical disk.
But y
On 9 October 2011 21:44, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 9 October 2011 19:10, Matt Thyer wrote:
>
> > Failure to boot the FreeBSD 9.0-BETA{2|3} memstick images does not
> indicate
> > a problem with a PCs BIOS/UEFI as these images are not properly
> formatted.
>
> Accepted.
>
> > If we were able to co
On 9 October 2011 19:10, Matt Thyer wrote:
> Failure to boot the FreeBSD 9.0-BETA{2|3} memstick images does not indicate
> a problem with a PCs BIOS/UEFI as these images are not properly formatted.
Accepted.
> If we were able to come up with examples of BIOS/UEFI that cannot boot from
> GPT par
On 9 October 2011 13:20, Thomas K. wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 07:28:55PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2011, Matt Thyer wrote:
> > >On Oct 9, 2011 11:04 AM, "Nathan Whitehorn"
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 10/08/11 19:25, Matt Thyer wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >There is also the i
On 9 October 2011 19:54, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> One issue that has not come up on the emailing list is that dd, designed to
> work with memsticks of various capacities, can not make the backup gpt at
> the end of the memstick.
>
> Partition is just big enough to hold the data, and I ran out of i
One issue that has not come up on the emailing list is that dd, designed to
work with memsticks of various capacities, can not make the backup gpt at the
end of the memstick.
Partition is just big enough to hold the data, and I ran out of inodes at times
due to the installer writing to /tmp on
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 19:39:56 -0700 Bob Finch wrote:
BF> Attempting to mount a remote SMB share with mount_smbfs fails:
BF> freebsd9b3# uname -a
BF> FreeBSD freebsd9b3 9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #0: Sat Sep 24 20:46:57 UTC
2011 r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
Hello, Poul-Henning.
You wrote 9 октября 2011 г., 11:37:21:
>> So, every other GEOM class should have special knowledge about GPT?
>>It doesn't look like "topology-agnostic" GEOM way :)
> That's mostly because GPT by design does not try to play nice.
I understand that... See my proposal in oth
In message <1644928028.20111008143...@serebryakov.spb.ru>, Lev Serebryakov writ
es:
>Hello, Poul-Henning.
>You wrote 8 =EE=EA=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 14:07:29:
>
>>> It seems, that GPT will be incompatible with any pure-software
>>> mirror or mirror-like RAID.
>> Unless you do what other impleme
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 9 октября 2011 г., 11:30:10:
>> To install FreeBSD on a gmirrored disk, use MBR (or "dangerously
>> dedicated" BSD label) instead of GPT. (This is one reason why
>> BSD label and MBR should not be considered obsolete.)
> MBR doesn't check size of provider on taste. It shoul
Hello, Perryh.
You wrote 9 октября 2011 г., 18:00:02:
> To install FreeBSD on a gmirrored disk, use MBR (or "dangerously
> dedicated" BSD label) instead of GPT. (This is one reason why
> BSD label and MBR should not be considered obsolete.)
MBR doesn't check size of provider on taste. It should
27 matches
Mail list logo
