Hi,
I'm trying to create a custom installer for FreeBSD to automatically setup our
systems, however I am having a very odd problem.
The general idea is that I build a release, then create a chroot in which I
install the slab of required ports for our system. I then tar that up and
format a USB
This the key here:
atrtc0: at port 0x70 irq 8 on isa0
Event timer "RTC" frequency 32768 Hz quality 0
Edgar, are you missing a device entry for the RTC?
Do you have device.hints in /boot ?
GENERIC.hints:hint.atrtc.0.at="isa"
GENERIC.hints:hint.atrtc.0.port="0x70"
GENERIC.hints:hint.atrtc.0.irq="
I have a debug kernel built..anything I can do in the meantime?
I imagine Pascal will be sleeping right about now.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:m...@sentex.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 1:12 PM
To: Edgar Martinez
Cc: Adrian Chadd; freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subje
Latest ALIX firmware? .99h?
I'm using the below board...
http://pcengines.ch/alix2d2.htm
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:m...@sentex.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:57 PM
To: Edgar Martinez
Cc: Adrian Chadd; freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: No valid time
(gdb) list *0xc05a9aa4
0xc05a9aa4 is in kdb_enter (/usr/src/sys/kern/subr_kdb.c:421).
416 if (kdb_dbbe != NULL && kdb_active == 0) {
417 if (msg != NULL)
418 printf("KDB: enter: %s\n", msg);
419 kdb_why = why;
420
On 8/31/2011 3:57 PM, Edgar Martinez wrote:
> Latest ALIX firmware? .99h?
>
> I'm using the below board...
>
> http://pcengines.ch/alix2d2.htm
Thats pretty well the same board as me, except I dont have the 2
mini-pci slots. Mine comes up as
Geode LX: PC Engines ALIX.2 v0.99h tinyBIOS V1.4a (C)
On 8/31/2011 3:25 PM, Edgar Martinez wrote:
> Nope..I rebuilt with both options..and just one at a time..
Strange,
My kernel is not so different from GENERIC. I added it to the bottom of
http://www.tancsa.com/beta2.html
Perhaps its a different Alix box than mine that is causing the issue
Nope..I rebuilt with both options..and just one at a time..
panic: No usable event timer found!
KDB: stack backtrace:
X_db_sym_numargs(c0758a2d) at 0xc0471f85 = X_db_sym_numargs+0x135
kdb_backtrace(c2820d38,1,fff,c2820d40,c070257a,...) at 0xc05a9c98 =
kdb_backtrace+0x28
panic(c077df08,c078251
On 08/31/11 20:13, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Hartmann, O.
wrote:
On 08/31/11 19:48, Chris Brennan wrote:
On 8/31/2011 1:43 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
[1] wrote:
On 08/30/2011 08:30 PM, Hartmann, O. wr
Previous releases had a line in /etc/fstab for /cdrom. Please consider
putting it back...it's just one more thing I have to remember to do
post-install.
--
Ron McDowell
San Antonio TX
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
> It seems to be truss(1) is broken on current
>
I just tried with a newly build CURRENT, and no problem here.
[solskogen@friend ~]$ truss /bin/echo x
mmap(0x0,32768,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) =
34366255104 (0x800637
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Hartmann, O.
wrote:
>
> On 08/31/11 19:48, Chris Brennan wrote:
>
> On 8/31/2011 1:43 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
> [1] wrote:
>
> On 08/30/2011 08:30 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>
> I would be scared
> awa
On 08/31/11 19:56, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Hartmann, O.
wrote:
I try to find a suitable reading/howto for how to enable softupdates
on
UFS2 filesystems.
Agreed. Added to http://wiki.freebsd.org/DocsFor9x .
Many thanks.
As I could see, SU+J is enlist
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Chris Brennan wrote:
...
> It should be noted on the FreeBSD side of the comparison, whom has
> borrowed concepts from FreeBSD, such as the network stack or Gentoo's
> Portage system (just to name a few that come to mind.)
It's good for historical references
On 08/31/11 19:48, Chris Brennan wrote:
On 8/31/2011 1:43 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
[1] wrote:
On 08/30/2011 08:30 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
I would be scared
away by such an arrogant looking page!
So, refactoring this page is a must.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Hartmann, O.
wrote:
>
> I try to find a suitable reading/howto for how to enable softupdates
> on
> UFS2 filesystems.
Agreed. Added to http://wiki.freebsd.org/DocsFor9x .
> As I could see, SU+J is enlisted to be enabled by default in 9.0-RELEASE.
Yes, it
On 8/31/2011 12:27 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Just to clarify for Edgar,
>
> His 9.0 build isn't finding any valid timers; hence why the thing
> panics upon boot.
>
> Since I've got a few Alix boards I'd like to use for 11n testing, i'd
> like to know how to make this work.
> Does anyone know the
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Ron McDowell wrote:
> Recently did a clean install of 9.0B1 into a 900gb VMware image.
...
> 3. A minor nit... no screen image for this one so I hope my explanation
> suffices. From the screen shown in 1 above [and on a disk with some
> unallocated space :) ],
On 8/31/2011 1:43 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
> wrote:
>> On 08/30/2011 08:30 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>>
>>> I would be scared
>>> away by such an arrogant looking page!
>>
>> So, refactoring this page is a must.
>> 1°) Put it offline? (i.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 10:58 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
>>
>> If that page would be updated at least monthly giving fair comparison
>> with other os'es it could serve a big pros list for preferring FreeBSD
>> over other systems.
>
> I do
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
wrote:
> On 08/30/2011 08:30 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>
>> I would be scared
>> away by such an arrogant looking page!
>
> So, refactoring this page is a must.
> 1°) Put it offline? (i.e with a "At work" placeholder)
> 2°) Process a feature
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
> Am Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:34:54 -0400
> schrieb Chris Brennan :
...
> You should compare what you can *DO* better with FreeBSD. And one thing
> that comes instantly into my mind is the FreeBSD port collection (for
> my part). I've tried var
I try to find a suitable reading/howto for how to enable softupdates
on
UFS2 filesystems. As I could see, SU+J is enlisted to be enabled by
default in 9.0-RELEASE. What is the status quo of that?
I've several active systems running UFS2 on their system disks while
data/home/mass
Just to clarify for Edgar,
His 9.0 build isn't finding any valid timers; hence why the thing
panics upon boot.
Since I've got a few Alix boards I'd like to use for 11n testing, i'd
like to know how to make this work.
Does anyone know the relevant magic to see which timers are available,
and force
on 27/08/2011 18:16 Marcel Moolenaar said the following:
> Maybe a good approach is to change to ".onfail retry"
> and extend the root mount prompt with a reboot command,
> so that the user/operator is does not have to worry
> about typos *and* don't have to trigger a panic just
> so that he/she ca
Recently did a clean install of 9.0B1 into a 900gb VMware image.
1. The mount path shown on the screen gets truncated if it's longer than
8 characters. See /usr/ports on the image at
http://www.fuzzwad.org/FreeBSD-9.0B1/fbsdinstall1.png It does mount
correctly but it'd be more useful to see
GDB: no debug ports present
KDB: debugger backends: ddb
KDB: current backend: ddb
Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered t
On 8/31/2011 8:07 AM, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
> Am Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:34:54 -0400
> schrieb Chris Brennan :
>
>> the object is to show people *WHY* FreeBSD is a sound (and valid)
>> choice against the competition, we can't just claim we're better
>> because we know we are, we have to provide a co
On Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:15:33 Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Or they need some hints already written by others like this:
> http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Health-Check-FreeBSD-The-unknown-gian
> t-920248.html
>
> I'm not sure whether this is linked on the project's webpage, I
> didn't find i
It seems to be truss(1) is broken on current
:~> truss /bin/echo x
x
truss: can not get etype: No such process
FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #0 r224884M
i386
from ktrace of turss
3162 trussCALL __sysctl(0xbfbfea00,0x4,0xbfbfe9e0,0xbfbfea10,0,0)
3162 trussSCTL "kern.proc.sv_name.3163"
3162
On 08/31/11 14:07, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
Am Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:34:54 -0400
schrieb Chris Brennan:
the object is to show people *WHY* FreeBSD is a sound (and valid)
choice against the competition, we can't just claim we're better
because we know we are, we have to provide a convincing argumen
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:59:48PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2011/8/29 ken :
> > Could I test your patch for nvidia-driver, too?
> > I cannot find your patch in this mail.
>
> I took the patch in :
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-August/026515.html
>
> And it work
Am Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:34:54 -0400
schrieb Chris Brennan :
> the object is to show people *WHY* FreeBSD is a sound (and valid)
> choice against the competition, we can't just claim we're better
> because we know we are, we have to provide a convincing argument that
> is true and honest fact.
Hi C
I use 9.0-BETA1 on my two PCs (amd64). On both of them, I can't
upgrade gnome-mplayer to 1.0.0_2, after recent bump. My default
compiler on both PCs is clang (version 20110717), but the same error
happens when using the default GCC.
The error message is:
gui.c:475:58: error: too many arguments to
I heard of that news, but I didn't realize that web site was managed by John
Birrell.
Now, DTrace is not feature-complete and stable, I don't think it is suitable
to http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/dtrace.html, but to
http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace, and people can easily update it
2011/8/31 C
Guys (; Girls; small fuzzy creatures);
We can talk about this forever, or someone can go over the existing 32
bit CUDA stuff in a 32 bit Linuxolator, get it all going, document it,
and post it or all to use.
Which do you think is going to be more productive?
Adrian
_
On 08/30/11 23:26, K. Macy wrote:
But the lack of response and non-shown interests shows a undeobtly signal
that freeBSD seems to be
dead for the HPC community and this could be also an indication for the lack
of CUDA support
by nVidia, Why performing efforts if no one cares? A great chance seems
On 08/31/11 08:59, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 31/08/2011 08:46 Adrian Chadd said the following:
My 2c:
* remove the page for now;
* someone finds someone with proven marketing skills;
* enlist their help in marketing, PR, etc, and update the website with
relevant details;
* the rest of us develope
on 31/08/2011 08:46 Adrian Chadd said the following:
> My 2c:
>
> * remove the page for now;
> * someone finds someone with proven marketing skills;
> * enlist their help in marketing, PR, etc, and update the website with
> relevant details;
>
> * the rest of us developers/users should go back to
39 matches
Mail list logo