Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-24 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 08:39:17AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > Are you positive it is this specific SVN revision that prevents cd0 > > from probing properly and not one of my previous CAM commits? Just > > getting to multi-user doesn't mean we're ok here. My GEOM changes may > > make the sys

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-24 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:09:08PM -0400, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > > No problem. I just set kern.geom.debugflags=4 in loader.conf and here is > > new photo (with recent kernel, no patches): > > http://img803.imageshack.us/img803/4679/25062011006.jpg > > I skip all noisy parts related to ada0 an

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-24 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
On 6/24/11 6:26 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:20:24PM -0400, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > Instead, I believe that either one of the GEOM taste methods is leaking an > access reference (so cdclose() is not called), or the CD driver is failing > to release the hold semaphore

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-06-24 Thread Adrian Chadd
Fixed! Sorry. Adrian On 25 June 2011 06:12, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2011-06-24 21:10:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2011-06-24 21:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm > TB --- 2011-06-24 21:10:00 - cleaning the object tree > TB --- 2011-

Re: current status of digi driver

2011-06-24 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2011-Jun-23 17:55:15 -0400, David Boyd wrote: >It appears that there was also agreement that (at least) some of the >drivers, digi included, would be converted soon after 8.0-RELEASE. That came down to developer time and it appeared that I was the only person interested in it. >Is there any p

Re: [RFT] Automatic load of USB kernel modules

2011-06-24 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Saturday 25 June 2011 00:15:17 Warner Losh wrote: >> Hey Hans, >> >> Given that all this stuff is really new and shiny, and we're really close >> to the feature freeze,  I'm not sure enabling it by default is the prudent >> action. >

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-24 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:20:24PM -0400, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > Instead, I believe that either one of the GEOM taste methods is leaking an > access reference (so cdclose() is not called), or the CD driver is failing > to release the hold semaphore during probing. Setting kern.geom.debugflags >

Re: [RFT] Automatic load of USB kernel modules

2011-06-24 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Saturday 25 June 2011 00:15:17 Warner Losh wrote: > Hey Hans, > > Given that all this stuff is really new and shiny, and we're really close > to the feature freeze, I'm not sure enabling it by default is the prudent > action. > Yes, you might be right. I'm not saying it should be enabled by

Re: [RFT] Automatic load of USB kernel modules

2011-06-24 Thread Warner Losh
Hey Hans, Given that all this stuff is really new and shiny, and we're really close to the feature freeze, I'm not sure enabling it by default is the prudent action. Warner On Jun 24, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Hi, > > I've been working today on getting auto load of USB k

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-06-24 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-24 21:10:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-24 21:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-06-24 21:10:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-24 21:10:20 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-24 21:10:20 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: virtualbox-ose 4.0.8 fails

2011-06-24 Thread George Kontostanos
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim > wrote: >> >> Any ideas regarding the virtualbox itself ? >> > >> > I am rebuilding world/kernel now.  After that, I'll rebuild >> > v

[RFT] Automatic load of USB kernel modules

2011-06-24 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi, I've been working today on getting auto load of USB kernel modules working properly. I've identified and fixed several issues since the initial patch by Robert Millan was posted. I would like to request testing of the attached patch before I commit it. The patch is about only having ukbd, u

sys/boot/i386/boot2 (install) fail

2011-06-24 Thread Doug Barton
On r223514M, kernel installed Ok, then after reboot and attempt to installworld I first get a failure that "btxld" is not found. So I add that to ITOOLS and then I get this. Any ideas? Thanks, Doug ===> sys/boot/i386/boot2 (install) as --32 -o boot2.o boot2.s ld -static -N --gc-sections -n

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-24 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
On 6/24/11 3:35 PM, Scott Long wrote: On Jun 23, 2011, at 11:18 PM, Scott Long wrote: > > On Jun 23, 2011, at 9:01 PM, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >> On 6/22/11 4:09 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:13:25 +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:54:04

Re: virtualbox-ose 4.0.8 fails

2011-06-24 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Friday 24 June 2011 02:58 pm, George Kontostanos wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > >> Any ideas regarding the virtualbox itself ? > > > > I am rebuilding world/kernel now. �After that, I'll rebuild > > virtualbox-ose and try to fix it unless someone beat me to it.

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental"

2011-06-24 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 06:20:03PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: > Got a "panic: Not a vnode object" quite fast: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/kostik441.txt Ah, yes, this is an assertion that was added in the r209702. http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/tmpfs.7.patch pgpfCkfwvYyso.pg

Re: WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB broken?

2011-06-24 Thread Milan Obuch
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:18:33 + Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:09:05PM +0400, Eir Nym wrote: > > On 16 June 2011 16:55, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:50:17PM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I encountered an error when WITHOUT_INS

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-24 Thread Scott Long
On Jun 23, 2011, at 11:18 PM, Scott Long wrote: > > On Jun 23, 2011, at 9:01 PM, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >> On 6/22/11 4:09 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:13:25 +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:54:04PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >

Re: virtualbox-ose 4.0.8 fails

2011-06-24 Thread George Kontostanos
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > >> Any ideas regarding the virtualbox itself ? > > I am rebuilding world/kernel now.  After that, I'll rebuild > virtualbox-ose and try to fix it unless someone beat me to it. :-) > > Jung-uk Kim > Brilliant !!! -- George Kontostanos aisecu

Re: virtualbox-ose 4.0.8 fails

2011-06-24 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Friday 24 June 2011 02:40 pm, George Kontostanos wrote: > > You should be able to build the kmod with this patch. > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-src-VBox-Runtime-r0drv-free > >bsd-mp-r0drv-freebsd.c > > > > Just drop this patch in ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/files > > and

Re: virtualbox-ose 4.0.8 fails

2011-06-24 Thread George Kontostanos
> > You should be able to build the kmod with this patch. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-src-VBox-Runtime-r0drv-freebsd-mp-r0drv-freebsd.c > > Just drop this patch in ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/files and > rebuild. > > Please note the revision wasn't set right for the obvious re

Re: virtualbox-ose 4.0.8 fails

2011-06-24 Thread Matt
On 06/24/11 10:52, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Friday 24 June 2011 01:14 pm, Matt wrote: It fails a couple ways actually, first on an isDVD in a disk system request...commenting out the inq_(something, not in front of machine with recent svn) parts of that code yields virtualbox compiling, but failing

Re: virtualbox-ose 4.0.8 fails

2011-06-24 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Friday 24 June 2011 01:14 pm, Matt wrote: > It fails a couple ways actually, first on an isDVD in a disk system > request...commenting out the inq_(something, not in front of > machine with recent svn) parts of that code yields virtualbox > compiling, but failing during kmod compile due to the r

Re: misc/157903: automated kldload for USB class devices

2011-06-24 Thread Warner Losh
On Jun 24, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Friday 24 June 2011 14:59:37 Robert Millan wrote: >> 2011/6/24 Hans Petter Selasky : Very nice. But why not use variable names instead of hardcoding numbers? It makes the output much easier to understand. >>> >>> To save mem

Re: virtualbox-ose 4.0.8 fails

2011-06-24 Thread Matt
On 06/24/11 09:41, George Kontostanos wrote: Hi everyone, I am trying to compile virtualbox-ose 4.0.8 but it fails with /out/freebsd.amd64/debug -DVBOX -DVBOX_WITH_DEBUGGER -DVBOX_OSE -DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING -DRTPATH_APP_PRIVATE=\"/usr/local/share/virtualbox-ose\" -DRTP

Re: make release: doesn't work for me, getting

2011-06-24 Thread Ryan Stone
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Kim Culhan wrote: > Attempting to run: make release resulted in 'looping' until a kernel compile > directory > sys/amd64/compile/* was removed. > > Maybe I missed something in the docs. > > -kim > ___ > freebsd-current@fr

virtualbox-ose 4.0.8 fails

2011-06-24 Thread George Kontostanos
Hi everyone, I am trying to compile virtualbox-ose 4.0.8 but it fails with /out/freebsd.amd64/debug -DVBOX -DVBOX_WITH_DEBUGGER -DVBOX_OSE -DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING -DRTPATH_APP_PRIVATE=\"/usr/local/share/virtualbox-ose\" -DRTPATH_APP_PRIVATE_ARCH=\"/usr/local/lib/virtualbo

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-06-24 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-24 15:20:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-24 15:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-06-24 15:20:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-24 15:20:20 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-24 15:20:20 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental"

2011-06-24 Thread Peter Holm
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 05:50:43PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 03:21:05PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:06:27PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:30:16PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:21

Re: [Testing wanted] USB patch for HAL

2011-06-24 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
24.06.2011 17:31, Hans Petter Selasky пишет: Hi, It appears there are some bugs in the USB2 HAL implementation. For example the parent USB device is not always correctly set and there are problems with dynamic attach/detach of USB devices in hald. For users of 9-current and 8-stable: Copy the

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental"

2011-06-24 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 03:21:05PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:06:27PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:30:16PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:21:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:31

Re: [Testing wanted] USB patch for HAL

2011-06-24 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 24 June 2011 15:51:03 Eir Nym wrote: > On 24 June 2011 17:31, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > [...] > > There're no attached file. Please check content type for attachments. > I think, if you'll make shar archive, it'll be better. > Look here: http://hselasky.homeunix.org

Re: [Testing wanted] USB patch for HAL

2011-06-24 Thread Eir Nym
On 24 June 2011 17:31, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Hi, > > [...] > There're no attached file. Please check content type for attachments. I think, if you'll make shar archive, it'll be better. -- Eir Nym > [...] > > --HPS > > ___ > freebsd-gn...@freeb

[Testing wanted] USB patch for HAL

2011-06-24 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi, It appears there are some bugs in the USB2 HAL implementation. For example the parent USB device is not always correctly set and there are problems with dynamic attach/detach of USB devices in hald. For users of 9-current and 8-stable: Copy the attached file to /usr/ports/sysutils/hal/file

Re: misc/157903: automated kldload for USB class devices

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Millan
2011/6/24 Hans Petter Selasky : >> Very nice.  But why not use variable names instead of hardcoding numbers? >> It makes the output much easier to understand. > > To save memory. I haven't inspected devd code, but I was under the assumption that variables only lived untill resolved. What would be

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-24 Thread Andrey Chernov
I forget to mention that the place is the same as trace shows: g_event_procbody-g_run_events-g_new_provider_event-g_dev_taste- g_dev_attrchanged-g_access-g_disk_access-cdopen-cam_periph_hold and it sleeps. On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 05:08:27PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental"

2011-06-24 Thread Peter Holm
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:06:27PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:30:16PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:21:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:31:09AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > Does anyone object to this

Re: misc/157903: automated kldload for USB class devices

2011-06-24 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 24 June 2011 14:59:37 Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/6/24 Hans Petter Selasky : > >> Very nice. But why not use variable names instead of hardcoding > >> numbers? It makes the output much easier to understand. > > > > To save memory. > > I haven't inspected devd code, but I was under the

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-24 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:01:17PM -0400, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > To test this theory, apply the following patch. I do not know if this > is safe for changer devices, but I will review the changer code if this > patch fixes ache's problem. I don't have changers. One of the plain ATA DVDs is read

Re: make release: doesn't work for me, getting

2011-06-24 Thread Kim Culhan
Attempting to run: make release resulted in 'looping' until a kernel compile directory sys/amd64/compile/* was removed. Maybe I missed something in the docs. -kim ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre

Re: MFC

2011-06-24 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 24/06/2011 14:44 Johan Hendriks said the following: > Hello all i have a question regarding MFC > > At the svn page from head most revisions comments contain a line like > MFC after:x weeks or x days. or x months. > Is this done automaticly, or is this still done by the auther. It's do

MFC

2011-06-24 Thread Johan Hendriks
Hello all i have a question regarding MFC At the svn page from head most revisions comments contain a line like MFC after:x weeks or x days. or x months. Is this done automaticly, or is this still done by the auther. I came to this question, because of the following. http://svnweb.freebsd

Re: misc/157903: automated kldload for USB class devices

2011-06-24 Thread Robert Millan
2011/6/24 Hans Petter Selasky : > Updated bus_auto.conf: > > http://hselasky.homeunix.org:8192/bus_auto.conf Very nice. But why not use variable names instead of hardcoding numbers? It makes the output much easier to understand. -- Robert Millan ___

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental"

2011-06-24 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:30:16PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:21:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:31:09AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > Does anyone object to this patch? > > > > > > David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of

Re: misc/157903: automated kldload for USB class devices

2011-06-24 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 24 June 2011 09:22:57 Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/6/24 Hans Petter Selasky : > > Updated bus_auto.conf: > > > > http://hselasky.homeunix.org:8192/bus_auto.conf > > Very nice. But why not use variable names instead of hardcoding numbers? > It makes the output much easier to understand.

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-06-24 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-24 09:30:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-24 09:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-06-24 09:30:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-24 09:30:21 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-24 09:30:21 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental"

2011-06-24 Thread Peter Holm
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:21:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:31:09AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > Does anyone object to this patch? > > > > David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two > > years with no problems. > > > > I may have misse