Re: [head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2011-06-22 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Jun 22, 2011, at 4:03 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> MAKE=/usr/bin/make sh /src/sys/conf/newvers.sh LINT >> cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall >> -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes >> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef >> -Wno-p

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2011-06-22 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 06:44 pm, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2011-06-22 20:58:31 - tinderbox 2.7 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-22 20:58:31 - starting > HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2011-06-22 20:58:31 - > cleaning the object tree > TB --- 2011-06-22 20:58

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2011-06-22 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-22 20:58:31 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-22 20:58:31 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2011-06-22 20:58:31 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-22 20:58:52 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-22 20:58:52 - /usr/bin/c

mariadb-server-5.2.6 failed on amd64 9

2011-06-22 Thread Doug Barton
Unfortunately this problem didn't magically fix itself in the 5.2.7 version of mariadb, so I'm still open to suggestions ... Doug Original Message Subject: mariadb-server-5.2.6 failed on amd64 9 Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:16:22 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://Su

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2011-06-22 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:46 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:46 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2011-06-22 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:37 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:37 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2011-06-22 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:46 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-22 19:10:46 - /usr/bin/c

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-22 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:13:25 +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:54:04PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > These two are interesting: > > > > > http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/1249/21062011014m.jpg > > > http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/3791/21062011015.jpg > > > >

Re: [poll / rfc] kdb_stop_cpus

2011-06-22 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 03/06/2011 18:13 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > I wonder if anybody uses kdb_stop_cpus with non-default value. I would like to go ahead and remove kdb_stop_cpus tunable/sysctl if nobody objects. > If, yes, I am very interested to learn about your usecase for it. > > I think that the d

Re: [poll / rfc] kdb_stop_cpus

2011-06-22 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 04/06/2011 11:22 Andriy Gapon said the following: > commit 458ebd9aca7e91fc6e0825c727c7220ab9f61016 > > generic_stop_cpus: move timeout detection code from under DIAGNOSTIC > > ... and also increase it a bit. > IMO it's better to detect and report the (rather serious) condition and

Re: Intel snd

2011-06-22 Thread George Kontostanos
Cheers! On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 22 June 2011 18:30, George Kontostanos wrote: > > Thanks, so I don't need to load sound.ko anymore either ? > > Yes. > > > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Sergey Kandaurov > wrote: > >> > >> On 22 June 2011 17:54, Georg

Re: Intel snd

2011-06-22 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 22 June 2011 18:30, George Kontostanos wrote: > Thanks, so I don't need to load sound.ko anymore either ? Yes. > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: >> >> On 22 June 2011 17:54, George Kontostanos wrote: >> > I was wondering if there are any issues lately with snd_hda

Re: Intel snd

2011-06-22 Thread George Kontostanos
Thanks, so I don't need to load sound.ko anymore either ? On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 22 June 2011 17:54, George Kontostanos wrote: > > I was wondering if there are any issues lately with snd_hda since I am > not > > able to load the module anymore. > > > > Jun

Re: Intel snd

2011-06-22 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 22 June 2011 17:54, George Kontostanos wrote: > I was wondering if there are any issues lately with snd_hda since I am not > able to load the module anymore. > > Jun 22 16:04:59 core2duo kernel: interface snd_hda.1 already present in the > KLD 'kernel'! > Jun 22 16:04:59 core2duo kernel: linker

Intel snd

2011-06-22 Thread George Kontostanos
I was wondering if there are any issues lately with snd_hda since I am not able to load the module anymore. Jun 22 16:04:59 core2duo kernel: interface snd_hda.1 already present in the KLD 'kernel'! Jun 22 16:04:59 core2duo kernel: linker_load_file: Unsupported file type > sysctl hw.snd hw.snd.vpc

Re: [PATCH] ipfw call/return rule actions

2011-06-22 Thread Vadim Goncharov
Hi Luigi Rizzo! On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:14:27 +0200; Luigi Rizzo wrote about 'Re: [PATCH] ipfw call/return rule actions': >> I have made a patch http://nuclight.avtf.net/vadim/ipfw_call_20110620.diff >> which adds a "call" and "return" rule actions to make it possible to >> organize "subroutines