TB --- 2011-02-04 04:10:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-04 04:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-02-04 04:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-04 04:10:15 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-04 04:10:15 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-02-04 01:27:44 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-04 01:27:44 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-02-04 01:27:44 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-04 01:27:54 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-04 01:27:54 - /usr
TB --- 2011-02-04 00:32:43 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-04 00:32:43 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-02-04 00:32:43 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-04 00:32:54 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-04 00:32:54 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:26 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:26 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:27 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:27 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:22 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-02-03 23:40:22 - /usr/bin/c
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I had never considered passing a set of packets, but after my initial
> scoffing thoughts I realized that it would actually be a very interesting
> thought experiment to see if the ability to do that would be advantageous in
> any way. I tma
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 08:08:15PM +, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 02/03/11 20:02, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 07:52:52PM +, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> >> Do you have a bug ID ?
> >
> > I think it is 6328632. Change 5a60f16123ba. Note, there are many, many
> >
hi everybody,
i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in
r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken includes,
which should be fixed by the attached patch. the commands i'm using are:
for target=buildkernel:
make SRCCONF=/dev/null __MA
On 2/3/11 10:08 AM, David Somayajulu wrote:
Hi All,
While sending the Received Ethernet Frames (non - LRO case) to the FreeBSD
Network Stack via
(struct ifnet *)->if_input((struct ifnet *), (struct *mbuf));
Is it possible to send multiple Ethernet Frames in a single invocation of the
above cal
On 02/03/11 20:02, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 07:52:52PM +, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>> Do you have a bug ID ?
>
> I think it is 6328632. Change 5a60f16123ba. Note, there are many, many
> other unrelated changes.
>
>> Do you have any work arounds?
>
> From what I c
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 07:52:52PM +, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Do you have a bug ID ?
I think it is 6328632. Change 5a60f16123ba. Note, there are many, many
other unrelated changes.
> Do you have any work arounds?
From what I can see, this change is in HEAD already, so I'll try that.
> W
Do you have a bug ID ?
Do you have any work arounds?
Will a reboot help ?
On 02/03/11 19:44, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 06:11:34AM +, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I have a zroot(mirror)+zmysql(raidz2) setup on a MySQL db box.
>> One drive failed (mfid3).
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 06:11:34AM +, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> All,
>
> I have a zroot(mirror)+zmysql(raidz2) setup on a MySQL db box.
> One drive failed (mfid3). We've since replaced it.
>
> I can't for the life of me get zpool to replace it. I can't remember why
> I used gpt instead of
On 02/03/11 10:38, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 03.02.2011 um 07:11 schrieb Philip M. Gollucci:
>
>> All filesystems are formatted with the current version.
>>
>> $ hd -v /dev/mfid3p1 | head
>> hd: /dev/mfid3p1: Input/output error
>>
>> $ hd -v /dev/gpt/disk3 | head
>> hd: /dev/gpt/disk3: Input/outpu
Hi All,
While sending the Received Ethernet Frames (non - LRO case) to the FreeBSD
Network Stack via
(struct ifnet *)->if_input((struct ifnet *), (struct *mbuf));
Is it possible to send multiple Ethernet Frames in a single invocation of the
above callback function?
In other words should (struct
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:09 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:05:31 am John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:58:12 am m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> > On a piece of hardware trying to verify basic build tests, we got an
>> > MCA exception that then panic'd th
On Thu, 03.02.2011 at 03:19:44 -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Gary Jennejohn
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:02:11 +0100
> > Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 02.02.2011 at 12:04:58 -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> >> > On 02/02/11 11:54, Alexander Best wrote:
> >> > > so f
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:05:31 am John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:58:12 am m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> > On a piece of hardware trying to verify basic build tests, we got an
> > MCA exception that then panic'd the kernel due to WITNESS/INVARIANTS
> > interaction.
> >
>
On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:58:12 am m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> On a piece of hardware trying to verify basic build tests, we got an
> MCA exception that then panic'd the kernel due to WITNESS/INVARIANTS
> interaction.
>
> panic @ time 1296563157.510, thread 0xff000554: blockable
> sle
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Gary Jennejohn
wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:02:11 +0100
> Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 02.02.2011 at 12:04:58 -0800, Xin LI wrote:
>> > On 02/02/11 11:54, Alexander Best wrote:
>> > > so far dd(1) with a bs=2048 finished after:
>> > >
>> > > 4676648960 byt
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:02:11 +0100
Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Wed, 02.02.2011 at 12:04:58 -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> > On 02/02/11 11:54, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > so far dd(1) with a bs=2048 finished after:
> > >
> > > 4676648960 bytes transferred in 1639.108763 secs (2853166 bytes/sec)
> >
> >
Am 03.02.2011 um 07:11 schrieb Philip M. Gollucci:
> All filesystems are formatted with the current version.
>
> $ hd -v /dev/mfid3p1 | head
> hd: /dev/mfid3p1: Input/output error
>
> $ hd -v /dev/gpt/disk3 | head
> hd: /dev/gpt/disk3: Input/output error
Did you install a partition table on the
2011/2/2 Christopher Olsen :
> Pawel,
>
> I have the latest current source and I patched with your zfs patch from
> zfs_20101213.patch and I am having trouble compiling my kernel.. Is there a
> more current patch to work with the latest –CURRENT source?
An answer from yesterday (working for me t
24 matches
Mail list logo
