On 6/10/2010 5:28 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> code in the base tree gets fixed by people making sweeping changes
> but things from ports often do not.
Code will either be maintained well, or it will not. I've seen plenty of
stuff in src break, and the src build is often broken by under-tested
cha
- Original Message
> From: Ganbold
> To: PseudoCylon
> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
> Sent: Thu, June 10, 2010 10:53:30 AM
> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless
>
> It seems like it is running without any problem so far, no more adsl
>
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:28:01PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> code in the base tree gets fixed by people making sweeping changes
> but things from ports often do not.
By 'sweeping changes', I take it you mean to src?
And if by 'things from ports', I take you mean that ports break on
-current
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:57:47 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:57:47 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:57:47 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:57:58 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:57:58 - /usr/b
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:52:30 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:52:30 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:52:30 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:52:50 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:52:50 - /usr
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:11:28 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:11:28 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:11:28 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:11:45 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-06-10 23:11:45 - /usr
On 06/11/10 03:46, John Baldwin wrote:
I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
(http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
tool for updating /etc during upgrades. Do folks have any strong objections
to doing so? More details about how it
On 6/10/10 1:25 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/10/10 11:18, Julian Elischer wrote:
| It does bring up the question (yet again) if we shouldn't
| have something that is between base and ports..
| the keep base from bloating too much bit to still indic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/10/10 19:11, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls
> -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
> -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -ffo
On 6/10/2010 4:47 PM, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
-1 Also.
How does this differ from a "mergemaster -iFU" ? That's pretty much as
automated as it can get.
I find the ability to do 'etcupdate diff' to quickly get an overview of which
changes I have made to a standard installation very usef
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/10/10 11:18, Julian Elischer wrote:
| It does bring up the question (yet again) if we shouldn't
| have something that is between base and ports..
| the keep base from bloating too much bit to still indicate
| that they are supported.
Julian,
Matthew Jacob writes:
> Comments? (yes, I know -fformat-extensions have just been added...)
>
>
>
> diff -r ea5e09d013e7 sys/conf/kern.mk
> --- a/sys/conf/kern.mkThu Jun 10 07:40:51 2010 -0700
> +++ b/sys/conf/kern.mkThu Jun 10 11:35:50 2010 -0700
> @@ -63,9 +67,15 @@
> # reserve
On 6/10/2010 2:47 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 10/06/2010 21:29 Eitan Adler said the following:
-1 unless mergemaster is replaced.
Have you tried etcupdate?
etcupdate and mergemaster have a similar function but do things in quite a
different way. While one is intended to be more interactive,
On Thursday 10 June 2010 23:28:03 David Sanders wrote:
> Am I just being stupid or should I expect my fresh svn co to build
> using Clang on i386 targets? It seems to use gcc still. Do I still
> need src.conf set up as per the wiki page?
as far as i understand, only the clang binary and libraries
On Thursday 10 June 2010 4:22:54 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> On 06/10/10 10:46, John Baldwin wrote:
> | I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
> | (http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
> | tool for updating /etc during upgrades. Do folks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/10/10 10:46, John Baldwin wrote:
| I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
| (http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
| tool for updating /etc during upgrades. Do folks have any str
Den 10/06/2010 kl. 22.31 skrev Mike Jakubik:
> On 6/10/2010 2:47 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 10/06/2010 21:29 Eitan Adler said the following:
>>
>>> -1 unless mergemaster is replaced.
>> Have you tried etcupdate?
>> etcupdate and mergemaster have a similar function but do things in quite a
>
On 06/10/2010 13:46, John Baldwin wrote:
> I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
> (http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
> tool for updating /etc during upgrades. Do folks have any strong objections
> to doing so? More details a
TB --- 2010-06-10 21:35:24 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-10 21:35:24 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2010-06-10 21:35:24 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-06-10 21:35:45 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-06-10 21:35:45 - /usr/bin/c
Am I just being stupid or should I expect my fresh svn co to build
using Clang on i386 targets? It seems to use gcc still. Do I still
need src.conf set up as per the wiki page?
Thanks
David
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
On 06/10/10 13:31, Mike Jakubik wrote:
How does this differ from a "mergemaster -iFU" ? That's pretty much as
automated as it can get.
FYI, the -F option is usually only needed once, when switching from cvs
checkout to svn checkout, or vice versa. It won't hurt anything to
combine it with -U,
On 6/10/2010 12:29 PM, Anonymous wrote:
Matthew Jacob writes:
Comments? (yes, I know -fformat-extensions have just been added...)
diff -r ea5e09d013e7 sys/conf/kern.mk
--- a/sys/conf/kern.mk Thu Jun 10 07:40:51 2010 -0700
+++ b/sys/conf/kern.mk Thu Jun 10 11:35:50 2010 -0700
@@ -63,9
on 10/06/2010 21:29 Eitan Adler said the following:
>> I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
>> (http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
>> tool for updating /etc during upgrades. Do folks have any strong objections
>> to doing so? Mo
Comments? (yes, I know -fformat-extensions have just been added...)
diff -r ea5e09d013e7 sys/conf/kern.mk
--- a/sys/conf/kern.mk Thu Jun 10 07:40:51 2010 -0700
+++ b/sys/conf/kern.mk Thu Jun 10 11:35:50 2010 -0700
@@ -9,6 +9,10 @@
.if ${CC} == "icc"
#CWARNFLAGS= -w2 # use this if you a
> I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
> (http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
> tool for updating /etc during upgrades. Do folks have any strong objections
> to doing so? More details about how it works and an HTML version of the
On 6/10/10 10:46 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
(http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
tool for updating /etc during upgrades. Do folks have any strong objections
to doing so? More details about how
On 10-06-2010 13:46, John Baldwin wrote:
> I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
> (http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
> tool for updating /etc during upgrades. Do folks have any strong objections
> to doing so? More details a
I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
(http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
tool for updating /etc during upgrades. Do folks have any strong objections
to doing so? More details about how it works and an HTML version of the
man
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:16 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 June 2010 5:27:47 pm Nathaniel W Filardo wrote:
> > Attempting to boot on (2-way SMP; SUN Fire V240) sparc64 a 9.0-CURRENT
> > kernel built on Jun 9 at 14:41, and fully csup'd before building (I don't
> > have the SVN revision
nice make -j3
d > DiagnosticCommonKinds.inc.h
tblgen: not found
*** Error code 127
*** Error code 127
tblgen -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/include
-I/usr/src/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include
-I/usr/src/lib/clang/libclanganalysis/.
AK-san,
PseudoCylon wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sorry for taking long.
>>
>> But, please try following update (if_run.c and if_runvar.h)
>> http://gitorious.org/run/run/blobs/raw/a74fa9ba5a16f1d1f058efa724261351e267a474/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c
>> http://gitorious.org/run/run/blobs/raw/a74fa9ba5a16f1d1f05
In message: <4c0e5646.1060...@freebsd.org>
Alexander Motin writes:
: Brandon Gooch wrote:
: > Alexander, do you feel that the code is at a stage where meaningful
: > user testing can occur?
:
: I think yes. I've touched a lot of legacy code, so it would be nice to
: know what I may ha
Just checked out r208985 i386.
On buildkernel I get this error:
cc -c -O -pipe -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
-Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys
-I/usr
On 06/06/2010 12:41 PM, b. f. wrote:
> Is anybody planning to update the base system heimdal, which has been
> largely untouched since May 2008? In addition to the many other
> bug-fixes and improvements in the current version 1.3.3 (see, for
> example:
>
> http://www.h5l.org/releases.html
>
> )
On 06/07/2010 02:29 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:15:27PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
>> On 6 June 2010 21:09, Jos Backus wrote:
>>
>>> Any chance the kadmin protocol will ever be standardized?
>>>
>> My understanding is that the MIT kadmin protocol is based GSS-API
>> authentic
On 06/10/10 22:23, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 11:54:53 pm Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Does anyone have objections to or feedback on the following patch? The
macro simplifies the act of calculating an aggregate from DPCPU counters.
http://people.freebsd.org/~lstewart/patches/tcp
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 11:54:53 pm Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> Does anyone have objections to or feedback on the following patch? The
> macro simplifies the act of calculating an aggregate from DPCPU counters.
>
>
http://people.freebsd.org/~lstewart/patches/tcp_ffcaia2008/dpcpu_sum_9.x.r208900.
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 5:27:47 pm Nathaniel W Filardo wrote:
> Attempting to boot on (2-way SMP; SUN Fire V240) sparc64 a 9.0-CURRENT
> kernel built on Jun 9 at 14:41, and fully csup'd before building (I don't
> have the SVN revision number, sorry) yields, surprisingly late in the boot
> process
exactly and I explained with an example how I would do that practically.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi all,
I would like to share with you my work in Summer of Code for Producing a
New FreeBSD Kernel Theme in the field of Reducing Size of Kernel for
Embedded and I will be glad to receive your comments. Download the attached
file please and I will be happy to connect with you
or download it h
40 matches
Mail list logo
