Re: LOR: ufs vs bufwait

2010-05-12 Thread Attilio Rao
2010/5/12 Jeff Roberson : > On Wed, 12 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote: > >> On Mon, 10.05.2010 at 22:53:32 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote: >>> >>> 2010/5/10 Peter Jeremy : On 2010-May-08 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote: > > This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, s

Re: LOR: ufs vs bufwait

2010-05-12 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote: On Mon, 10.05.2010 at 22:53:32 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote: 2010/5/10 Peter Jeremy : On 2010-May-08 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote: This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather new. I do use SUJ. lock order reversal:

dc(1) -e "6 2 / p" is still broken as of r207919

2010-05-12 Thread Alexey Shuvaev
Hello! Just to remind that still: ~> dc -e "6 2 / p" Segmentation fault (core dumped) This was already mentioned on this list: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-April/016560.html and there is a patch proposed in the same thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-cu

Re: igb broken? Unexplained weirdness with intel 82576 nics on a supermicro board.

2010-05-12 Thread Patrick Mahan
Check to make sure the links are all full-duplex. We started seeing bad performance with the em(4) driver on our HP Proliant 360DL G5's using 1000Mbits. It turned out that switch was setting it's port to half-duplex and the emX interface was following suit. HTH, Patrick joe wrote: On 05/08/

Re: LOR: ufs vs bufwait

2010-05-12 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Mon, 10.05.2010 at 22:53:32 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote: > 2010/5/10 Peter Jeremy : > > On 2010-May-08 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > >>This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather > >>new. I do use SUJ. > >> > >>lock order reversal: > >> 1st 0xc48388d8 ufs (uf

Re: HEADS UP: 64-bit quotas going in to head today

2010-05-12 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 02:05:06PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Kostik Belousov writes: > > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav writes: > > > It adds quite a bit of code to pretty much every UFS VOP. > > No, it does not. Essentially, it adds one or two function calls per > > vop that allocate or dealloc

Re: HEADS UP: 64-bit quotas going in to head today

2010-05-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Kostik Belousov writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes: > > It adds quite a bit of code to pretty much every UFS VOP. > No, it does not. Essentially, it adds one or two function calls per > vop that allocate or deallocate blocks or inodes, and the function > bodies verify two array members and retu

Re: [PATCH:] psm(4) IntelliMouse Explorer KVM hack breaks my mouse

2010-05-12 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:41:41 +0200 Juergen Lock wrote: > So now I made a patch that allows disabling that KVM hack via device > hints, appended below. (hint.psm.0.flags="0x1" - or do you guys > think the hack should be disabled by default instead?) > Don't change the behavior, leave it en

Re: fsck unable to read disk sectors

2010-05-12 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:15:13PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote: >> i've posted a log here which is pretty self explanatory: >> >> http://pastebin.com/tn3NiDDW >> >> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Alexander Best >> wrote: >> > the problem i

Re: Addition of lzma/xz compression to HEAD

2010-05-12 Thread Fabien Thomas
Thanks, this is very useful. Fabien Le 11 mai 2010 à 21:31, Alexey Shuvaev a écrit : > Hello! > > Just FYI: noticed addition of lzma directory to BSD.include.dist mtree file. > Well, now it seems to work! > > /* Test file size 264 MiB */ > [wep4035] ~> ll /usr/local/tinderbox/jails/9-amd