In message: <4b9ee1ad.9080...@freebsd.org>
Doug Barton writes:
: > I believe the latter can be simplified to not require it.
:
: When I last looked at it I vaguely recall thinking that not needing
: newvers.sh for that purpose was a good goal, but ENOTIME.
Right now it is required to
On 03/15/10 18:34, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <4b9edb05.4020...@freebsd.org>
> Doug Barton writes:
> : On 03/15/10 17:41, David O'Brien wrote:
> : > I'd rather not introduce yet more special things that have to be done
> : > before invoking newvers.sh.
> :
> : David,
> :
>
In message: <4b9edb05.4020...@freebsd.org>
Doug Barton writes:
: On 03/15/10 17:41, David O'Brien wrote:
: > I'd rather not introduce yet more special things that have to be done
: > before invoking newvers.sh.
:
: David,
:
: Trying to understand what you're getting at here. What's
David
In message: <20100316004117.gb36...@dragon.nuxi.org>
"David O'Brien" writes:
: On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:13:03PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > The Makefile already knows where the kernel src is located. Let's use
: > that knowledge to make things a little simpler. This als
On 03/15/10 17:41, David O'Brien wrote:
> I'd rather not introduce yet more special things that have to be done
> before invoking newvers.sh.
David,
Trying to understand what you're getting at here. What's your use case
for invoking newvers.sh from the command line? AFAIK it's only every
used a
In message: <20100316002939.ga36...@dragon.nuxi.org>
"David O'Brien" writes:
: On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:44:26AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <20100315142806.ga5...@dragon.nuxi.org>
: > "David O'Brien" writes:
: > : On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:13:03PM -0700
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:13:03PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> The Makefile already knows where the kernel src is located. Let's use
> that knowledge to make things a little simpler. This also uses the
> Makefile variable SYSDIR. It should also work with non-standard sys
> directories.
..
> I
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:44:26AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20100315142806.ga5...@dragon.nuxi.org>
> "David O'Brien" writes:
> : On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:13:03PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message: <20100312171206.ga31...@dragon.nuxi.org>
> : >
At 12:59 PM -0600 3/12/10, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:22:55AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> Yes it is. Where was it discussed first? I do not see anything
> in my freebsd-arch or freebsd-current archive; or any other
> FreeBSD list.
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B
Svein Skogen (Listmail Account) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15.03.2010 13:49, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Hi
I originally wasn't going to weigh in on this, but:
options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 #Compatible with FreeBSD4
options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 #Comp
In message: <20100315142806.ga5...@dragon.nuxi.org>
"David O'Brien" writes:
: On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:13:03PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <20100312171206.ga31...@dragon.nuxi.org>
: > "David O'Brien" writes:
: > : * Simplify SRCDIR calculation by directl
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:13:03PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20100312171206.ga31...@dragon.nuxi.org>
> "David O'Brien" writes:
> : * Simplify SRCDIR calculation by directly finding the kernel sources
> : based directly on one of them.
> : Reviewed by: dhw
> : This
TB --- 2010-03-15 12:14:15 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-03-15 12:14:15 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2010-03-15 12:14:15 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-03-15 12:14:33 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-03-15 12:14:33 - /usr/bin/c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15.03.2010 13:49, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Hi
>
> I originally wasn't going to weigh in on this, but:
>
> options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 #Compatible with FreeBSD4
> options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 #Compatible with FreeBSD5
> options
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:49:11 +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Hi
I originally wasn't going to weigh in on this, but:
options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 #Compatible with FreeBSD4
options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 #Compatible with FreeBSD5
options COMPAT_FREEBSD6 #Compatib
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Hi
>
> I originally wasn't going to weigh in on this, but:
>
> options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 #Compatible with FreeBSD4
> options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 #Compatible with FreeBSD5
> options COMPAT_FREEBSD6 #C
Hi
I originally wasn't going to weigh in on this, but:
options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 #Compatible with FreeBSD4
options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 #Compatible with FreeBSD5
options COMPAT_FREEBSD6 #Compatible with FreeBSD6
options COMPAT_FREEBSD7 #Com
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:48:26AM +0100, Alexander Egorenkov wrote:
> Later i also plan to add multi BSS support so upto 8 HOSTAPs, several STAs
> and WDSs will be possible with rt2860 and rt2870 on FreeBSD 8.
But I guess MiniPCIe version support is not on the horizon?
Thanx,
Oliver
18 matches
Mail list logo
