On Saturday 13 March 2010 03:42:46 Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 13 Mar 2010, at 09:18, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:50:29AM -0800, PseudoCylon wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Finally, I have fixed mysterious device lock out and run(4) works
> >> fine
> >> in HOSTAP mode. Up time is 80
On 13 Mar 2010, at 09:18, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:50:29AM -0800, PseudoCylon wrote:
Hello,
Finally, I have fixed mysterious device lock out and run(4) works
fine
in HOSTAP mode. Up time is 80 hours and counting. I even filed tax
though it.
The device supports up to
- Original Message
> From: Rui Paulo
> To: Weongyo Jeong
> Cc: PseudoCylon ; Alexander Egorenkov
> ; freebsd-current@freebsd.org
> Sent: Fri, March 12, 2010 7:42:46 PM
> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless
>
> On 13 Mar 2010, at 09:18, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
>
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Tom Couch
> wrote:
>> Hi FreeBSD-current,
>> My name is Tom Couch,
>> I am part of the 3ware driver team recently acquired by LSI.
>> I believe Giovanni's patch, below, is the correct fix for this bug.
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 08:59:01AM +0300, Azim wrote:
> I tried ndisgen to convert BCMWL564.SYS using FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT
> FEB-2010(x86).
> The files I had were :
> It gave an error stating BCM43XX64.CAT(unrequired),
> BCM43XX.CAT(unrequired), bcmwl5.inf and BCMWL564.SYS
>
> I had successfully
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:50:29AM -0800, PseudoCylon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Finally, I have fixed mysterious device lock out and run(4) works fine
> in HOSTAP mode. Up time is 80 hours and counting. I even filed tax
> though it.
>
> The device supports up to 253 stations. I only tested with 2 stati
> Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:45:47PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> > > The bce(4) hardware supports a linked list of pages for RX buffer
> > > descriptors. The stock build supports 2 pages (RX_PAGES) with a
> > > total of 511 BD's per page. The hardware can support
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:10:14AM +0200, Alexandr Rybalko wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 00:28:33 -0800
> Weongyo Jeong wrote:
>
> >> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:32:40AM +0200, Alexandr Rybalko wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:52:59 -0800
> >> > Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Can You test
Hi,
I have tree VM, (8.0, 7.3RC2, 9-current), in release 8.0 I have
not problem with variables: HTTP_PROXY, http_proxy, but in 7.3 and
9-current, seems that the part of authentication is not exported.
I use shell tcsh, my variables:
setenv HTTP_PROXY http://user:p...@proxyserver.
In message: <20100312171758.gb31...@dragon.nuxi.org>
"David O'Brien" writes:
: On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 07:24:23PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <7d6fde3d1003111720g7dccf93w1f51db88758a5...@mail.gmail.com>
: > Garrett Cooper writes:
: > : On Thu, Mar 11, 2010
Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Fri, 12.03.2010 at 11:36:25 +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:24:57 -0800
Garrett Cooper wrote:
I can haz PR review then? Here's an easy one :)...
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144644
Looks OK to me except I don't like the
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:22:55AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> Yes it is. Where was it discussed first? I do not see anything in my
> freebsd-arch or freebsd-current archive; or any other FreeBSD list.
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B971CA3.9090301
crossposted on amd64@, ia64@, emulat..
David O'Brien wrote:
Yes names matter. Otherwise we would have made it "DEF8931". #define
names are chosen to be self-documenting.
$ grep COMPAT_FREEBSD conf/*
conf/NOTES:# Note that as a general rule, COMPAT_FREEBSD depends on
conf/NOTES:# COMPAT_FREEBSD, COMPAT_FREEBSD, etc.
conf/NO
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 02:52:48PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> Finally I managed to understand how Rx checksum offloading works on
> Yukon II controllers. The patch at the following URL will add Rx
> checksum offloading support to msk(4) controllers.
> http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/msk/msk.
On Friday 12 March 2010 11:32:41 am David O'Brien wrote:
> Details at
> http://trang.nuxi.org:8080/panics/DSC_0010.JPG
>
> Kernel sources at r203083 are stable for me.
Unfortunately the other useful bits have scrolled off the screen (the faulting
VA for example). Both of these panics do not loo
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 08:54:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Mike Jakubik
> > wrote:
> >> On 3/11/2010 9:50 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> >>>
> >>> As a result of importing 32-bit compatibility support for non-
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 07:24:23PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <7d6fde3d1003111720g7dccf93w1f51db88758a5...@mail.gmail.com>
> Garrett Cooper writes:
> : On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> : > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Mike Jakubik
> : > wrote
* Simplify SRCDIR calculation by directly finding the kernel sources
based directly on one of them.
Reviewed by: dhw
This change does not increase the kernel build time. It also continues
to restrict the revision to just the kernel sources, and not the whole
tree.
Timing tests by: dhw
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:04:40AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> My build machine (dmesg attached) is a dual CPU, single-core box; my
> laptop is a single CPU, single-core box. I track head on each daily;
> while the build machine has been locking up during the transition to
> multi-user mode si
Details at
http://trang.nuxi.org:8080/panics/DSC_0010.JPG
Kernel sources at r203083 are stable for me.
Unfortunately, I cannot get a dump for this.
--
-- David (obr...@freebsd.org)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Details at
http://trang.nuxi.org:8080/panics/DSC_0070.JPG
Kernel sources at r203083 are stable for me.
Unfortunately, I cannot get a dump for this.
--
-- David (obr...@freebsd.org)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On Fri, 12.03.2010 at 11:36:25 +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:24:57 -0800
> Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
> > I can haz PR review then? Here's an easy one :)...
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144644
> >
>
> Looks OK to me except I don't like the
>
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:24:57 -0800
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> I can haz PR review then? Here's an easy one :)...
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144644
>
Looks OK to me except I don't like the
if (something) {
one-line-of-code();
}
constructs, bu
23 matches
Mail list logo