I'm running:
FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #18: Sat Aug 9 16:53:59 EDT 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GYROS
And I just bought one of those 256 MB USB JumpDrives. The drive works
fine under -STABLE and in USB 1.1 slots on -CURRENT:
umass0: LEXAR MEDIA JUMPDRIVE PRO, rev 2.00/0.00, addr
Please run 'sysctl vm.zone' periodically and capture the output.
Then wait for this to happen and feel free to send me the last captured
output before the crash.
Is this a re-occuring crash for you? I thought we fixed this already.
Are you sure you have the absolute latest -current? (or are you
Hi There
I removing the debugs on my kernel, but any way, do you think the setup
of my wireless card is wrong:
wi0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
ether 00:60:b3:7a:a3:1d
media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/11Mbps
(DS/2Mbps )
status: associated
ssid XBOX 1:XBOX
why I still
Hi,
>I've got a toshiba portege 4000 with inbuilt wi0 wireless card. On
>resume dhclient kicks off straight away which then breaks as the card
You mean dhclient gets killed ? One way could be to kill dhclient when you
sleep. Afterwords, devd should restart it, right ? Unfortunatly I cannot
test
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 10:13:57PM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have Chaintech Apogee 7VGL motherboard with on-board CMedia 8738 audio chip.
> Kernel identifies it as follows:
> pcm0: port 0xe400-0xe4ff irq 10 at device 19.0 on pci0
>
> I am running very recent -current.
>
> W
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 10:30, Chris Larsen wrote:
> In the year of 2003, on Monday, August 11 at 16:30 +0200, Mark Sergeant proclaimed:
> > I'm running current as of two weeks ago I get the following problem when
> > doing a make in /etc/mail ...
> >
> > makemap: virtusertable.db: line 206: key [EM
TB --- 2003-08-12 05:34:17 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2003-08-12 05:34:17 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-08-12 05:35:51 - building world
TB --- cd /
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote:
> Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so could
> someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual system using
> mp's but not sure which version would be better.
Scheduling in 5.1 is broken (sched_ule doesn't even work
