On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 08:36:05AM +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:41:14 +0300
> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> RE> Currently it is supported, but may not be soon. The
> RE> issue was brought up with Technical Review Board who
> RE> are currently in the pro
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:41:14 +0300
Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RE> Currently it is supported, but may not be soon. The
RE> issue was brought up with Technical Review Board who
RE> are currently in the process of voting on the supported
RE> upgrade path matrix (both native and cross a
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:36:15PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:07:12PM -0600, Glenn Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:54:05PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > > yes..
> > >
> > > The entire process structure and it's surrounding enviroment has
> >
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:07:12PM -0600, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:54:05PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > yes..
> >
> > The entire process structure and it's surrounding enviroment has been
> > through a blender.
>
Conrad Sabatier wrote:
>
> On 04-Apr-2003 Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> >> Having had the same experiences as others described here recently with
> >> the
> >> fxp stuff, I'm just wondering if it's safe now to cvsup and try it
> >> again.
> >> I only have one machine here and
Hi all,
Robin P. Blanchard wrote:
> Following sources still yield unresponsive fxp interface. The same behavious
> occurs on both of my test boxes (dell 4350 and home-grown athlon xp), each
> having identical Intel Pro 100+M nics with v4.1.0.9 intel PXE rom.
>
> # fgrep -h \*\ \$FreeBSD
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:54:05PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > yes..
> >
> > The entire process structure and it's surrounding enviroment has been
> > through a blender.
> >
> > What do you w
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 11:52:15AM +0200, Stephan M?ck wrote:
> > I want to use imon inode monitor to watch file activity. Is it possible to
> > do that with FreeBSD?
>
> I don't see imon in the ports collection. However there are other
> tools like l0pht-watch and fam in p
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:54:05PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> yes..
>
> The entire process structure and it's surrounding enviroment has been
> through a blender.
>
> What do you wnat to do?
I would like to learn what I need to do to get t
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 11:52:15AM +0200, Stephan M?ck wrote:
> I want to use imon inode monitor to watch file activity. Is it possible to
> do that with FreeBSD?
I don't see imon in the ports collection. However there are other
tools like l0pht-watch and fam in ports (I don't know if fam uses
kq
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:50:45PM -0500, Barney Wolff wrote:
> I need to buildworld (current) and ports to run on both p3 and athlon-mp.
> What's a good value for CPUTYPE, or should I just leave it out?
i686 is the lowest common divisor of those two.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
yes..
The entire process structure and it's surrounding enviroment
has been through a blender.
What do you wnat to do?
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> I have some software that compiled fine on FreeBSD-4 but is not
> compiling on FreeBSD-5. It is looking for kp_proc and kp_eproc.
* De: Glenn Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-04-04 ]
[ Subjecte: kp_proc and kp_eproc ]
> I have some software that compiled fine on FreeBSD-4 but is not
> compiling on FreeBSD-5. It is looking for kp_proc and kp_eproc. The
> error I get is:
>
> structure has no member name
I have some software that compiled fine on FreeBSD-4 but is not
compiling on FreeBSD-5. It is looking for kp_proc and kp_eproc. The
error I get is:
structure has no member named `kp_proc'
structure has no member named `kp_eproc'
Have those changed from FreeBSD-4?
Thanks.
--
G
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:31:00PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Apr 02), Jeff Roberson said:
> > On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> >
> > > I think it was a libthr linked app after I killed it:
> >
> > Yeah, this is a problem with the thread single exit and suspend code
In the last episode (Apr 02), Jeff Roberson said:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
>
> > I think it was a libthr linked app after I killed it:
>
> Yeah, this is a problem with the thread single exit and suspend code.
> I haven't fixed it yet. Thanks for the report.
I get the same LOR
Hello
I have 4 IDE disks that I'm going to use for a small RAID. During my
testing with the ata(4) software RAID I had created a RAID0 on two of
the disks. I then deleted it and tried to create a new array (different
interleave) but I had forgotten to unmounted the filesystem on the RAID
I just
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 01:30:39PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> As the subject says, I'm wondering if anyone out there has experienced
> hangs on logging out from xdm (or perhaps switching VTs) with Radeon or
> matrox (perhaps r128, too) cards using the updated DRM in -current and
> XFree86 4.3.0.
On 04-Apr-2003 Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Conrad Sabatier wrote:
>> Having had the same experiences as others described here recently with
>> the
>> fxp stuff, I'm just wondering if it's safe now to cvsup and try it
>> again.
>> I only have one machine here and if my net interface fails, I'm totally
Eric Anholt wrote:
As the subject says, I'm wondering if anyone out there has experienced
hangs on logging out from xdm (or perhaps switching VTs) with Radeon or
matrox (perhaps r128, too) cards using the updated DRM in -current and
XFree86 4.3.0. If so, I may have a fix, but I'm wondering if thi
As the subject says, I'm wondering if anyone out there has experienced
hangs on logging out from xdm (or perhaps switching VTs) with Radeon or
matrox (perhaps r128, too) cards using the updated DRM in -current and
XFree86 4.3.0. If so, I may have a fix, but I'm wondering if this
affects FreeBSD.
Following sources still yield unresponsive fxp interface. The same behavious
occurs on both of my test boxes (dell 4350 and home-grown athlon xp), each
having identical Intel Pro 100+M nics with v4.1.0.9 intel PXE rom.
# fgrep -h \*\ \$FreeBSD /usr/src/sys/dev/fxp/*
* $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/fxp/i
Ok, I got a panic dump:
Script started on Fri Apr 4 14:25:59 2003
lerlaptop# shutdown -r now?[12`cd /?[K
?[Klerlaptop# k??[Kgdb -k kernel.1 vmcore.1
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
I want to use imon inode monitor to watch file activity. Is it possible to
do that with FreeBSD?
And where can I get a update or a patch for the installation?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
T
Hello,
I've been fiddling with pci drivers in freebsd for a couple of
months and up to now everything has ok, I did a midi driver for es137x
which was relatively easy because the io was done on the pci bus. I
was very pleased that there were enough resources for a newbie like me
to dive in
I just upgraded my laptop's HDD from 20G to 60G, and set it up as a
dual boot 4-STABLE and 5-CURRENT.
When running under BOTH 5.0-RELEASE and 5.0-CURRENT from today,
with my LinkSys WPC11 V3.0 card in, I get random Integer Exception
panics.
The 5.0-CURRENT dropped me in to DB, and the backtrace p
I need to buildworld (current) and ports to run on both p3 and athlon-mp.
What's a good value for CPUTYPE, or should I just leave it out?
Thanks.
--
Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf
I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.
___
Conrad Sabatier wrote:
Having had the same experiences as others described here recently with the
fxp stuff, I'm just wondering if it's safe now to cvsup and try it again.
I only have one machine here and if my net interface fails, I'm totally
screwed. :-)
reinstallkernel and boot-conf kernel.ol
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 08:57:38AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:12:09AM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > Is it supported to be running under a 4-STABLE world and build
> > a 5-CURRENT world?
>
> Yes.
>
Currently it is supported, but may not be soon. The
issue was brou
Nate Lawson writes:
> You're right about where the problem is (top of stack trace and listing
> below). However, your patch causes an immediate panic on boot due to a
> NULL deref. I don't think you want it to always return NULL if called
> with M_NOWAIT set. :) Other ideas?
The follow
As always, whenever I crash before background fsck is finished...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/home/dcs$ gdb -k /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DCS/kernel.debug
/var/crash/vmcore.8
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License
It seems Konsole didn't like libthr a bit. And, now that I think about
it, neither did licq, though I didn't notice it at the time I was
closing the KDE Crash Handler windows.
The trace I'm posting below is typical. I had some 20 windows with the
same thing, and the error occured at startup. I
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:12:09AM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Is it supported to be running under a 4-STABLE world and build
> a 5-CURRENT world?
Yes.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> Having had the same experiences as others described here recently with the
> fxp stuff, I'm just wondering if it's safe now to cvsup and try it again.
> I only have one machine here and if my net interface fails, I'm totally
> screwed. :-)
It should. If it doesn't, I'm
On 04-Apr-2003 Wade Majors wrote:
> Conrad Sabatier wrote:
>> Having had the same experiences as others described here recently with
>> the fxp stuff, I'm just wondering if it's safe now to cvsup and try it
>> again.
>> I only have one machine here and if my net interface fails, I'm totally
>> sc
Is it supported to be running under a 4-STABLE world and build
a 5-CURRENT world?
I have a dual-boot laptop with both 4 & 5 in separate partitions
and cross-mounted appropriately.
5-RELEASE seems to occasionally Integer Exception out (seems to be
with my wi card in), so I was wondering if it was
Conrad Sabatier wrote:
Having had the same experiences as others described here recently with the
fxp stuff, I'm just wondering if it's safe now to cvsup and try it again.
I only have one machine here and if my net interface fails, I'm totally
screwed. :-)
You can still boot your old kernel from
Having had the same experiences as others described here recently with the
fxp stuff, I'm just wondering if it's safe now to cvsup and try it again.
I only have one machine here and if my net interface fails, I'm totally
screwed. :-)
--
Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas"
__
Nate Lawson writes:
> I have gotten fxp running with MPSAFE and did a large scp transfer. It
> ran for a few minutes and then paniced. It was trap 12 (page fault) at
> address 0x24. Here is where it crashed:
>
<..>
> The deref of mb_head->m_pkthdr is invalid. Note that my fxp_intr functi
Nate Lawson writes:
>
> You're right about where the problem is (top of stack trace and listing
> below). However, your patch causes an immediate panic on boot due to a
> NULL deref. I don't think you want it to always return NULL if called
> with M_NOWAIT set. :) Other ideas?
>
--
---
Otto Kucera
A-1020 Wien Engerthstrasse 137/6/7
Tel: +43 699 1 942 30 91 [neue Nummer!]
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Icq: 65351173
---
And root said rm -rf / ..and there was nothing
Your mailserver MUST resolve properly (Ful
Nate Lawson wrote:
> I have gotten fxp running with MPSAFE and did a large scp transfer. It
> ran for a few minutes and then paniced. It was trap 12 (page fault) at
> address 0x24. Here is where it crashed:
>
> fxp_start+0xcc
> 0xc0194a4c is in fxp_start (../../../dev/fxp/if_fxp.c:1263).
> 1258
Regarding this issue it has been tracked to the Xft port and noted on the
freebsd-ports mailing list. So I guess it'll be fixed shortly.
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=629561+0+current/freebsd-ports
I would suggest any further conversation regarding it be done on that list as
it's a
On Friday 04 April 2003 14:03, Bradley T Hughes wrote:
> On Friday 04 April 2003 13:57, Wade Majors wrote:
> > This bit me this morning, too. I believe Xft is where the circle
> > happens, at least thats what i had to neuter to get other stuff
> > building.
>
> It seems you are right:
>
> Xft d
On Friday 04 April 2003 13:57, Wade Majors wrote:
> This bit me this morning, too. I believe Xft is where the circle
> happens, at least thats what i had to neuter to get other stuff
> building.
It seems you are right:
Xft depends on XFree86-4-fontEncodings
XFree86-4-fontEncodings depends
How do you prevent a particular package from updating when doing a large
portupgrade, or did you just do one at a time?
Anthony
On Friday 04 April 2003 13:57, Wade Majors wrote:
> CARTER Anthony wrote:
> > I can get it to do it with portupgrade -r Mesa...so we can limit it to
> > Mesa and/or one
CARTER Anthony wrote:
I can get it to do it with portupgrade -r Mesa...so we can limit it to Mesa
and/or one of its dependencies...NO?
This bit me this morning, too. I believe Xft is where the circle
happens, at least thats what i had to neuter to get other stuff building.
-Wade
___
I can get it to do it with portupgrade -r Mesa...so we can limit it to Mesa
and/or one of its dependencies...NO?
I don't use gnome, i use KDE. Maybe a library?
Anthony
P.S. Matt, can you post this to port@ (put me in CC for replies) as I don't
want to cross-post. Thanks
On Friday 04 April 20
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:21:25 +0200, CARTER Anthony wrote
> Can you let me know about this, or forward a copy of the post, or
> even tell me what you mean by "ports@"...Is this another mailing list?
>
> Thanks,
> Anthony
Sorry. I always assume people are on the same lists as me :)
http://docs.fre
Can you let me know about this, or forward a copy of the post, or even tell me
what you mean by "ports@"...Is this another mailing list?
Thanks,
Anthony
On Friday 04 April 2003 12:35, Matt wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:25:33 +0200, CARTER Anthony wrote
>
> > Did portupgrade get updated then?
>
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:25:33 +0200, CARTER Anthony wrote
> Did portupgrade get updated then?
>
> I am not using gnome...
>
> The only thing I can think of is that an update has created a loop
> within itself, thereby launching subsequent sorts...I get 10 or so
> sorts, about 20-30 make's, kill t
Did portupgrade get updated then?
I am not using gnome...
The only thing I can think of is that an update has created a loop within
itself, thereby launching subsequent sorts...I get 10 or so sorts, about
20-30 make's, kill them they come back...
Anthony
On Friday 04 April 2003 12:09, Matt wr
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:56:37 +0200, CARTER Anthony wrote
>
> Watching with swapinfo, my 500Mb (256 Mb Ram) swapfile just fills
> up...on stopping portupgrade, swap file is emptied...
I have exactly the same thing, just my machine can cope with it a bit better
as I have 512M physical and 1gig swa
MoreThis time outside of X11 and KDE...Just in console:
Apr 4 11:26:43 intra241 kernel: pid 476 (httpd), uid 80, was killed: out of
swap space
Apr 4 11:26:43 intra241 kernel: pid 11877 (sort), uid 0, was killed: out of
swap space
Apr 4 11:26:43 intra241 last message repeated 2 times
Apr
Hey guys,
Just did a CVSup, and did a portupgrade -rRa.
I watched it install libxml update and fontconfig and apache2. I then left it
to its things and went to get a coffee
On return, I got the login screen for KDE???
So I logged in and tried to run portupgrade -rRa again just to confirm
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 00:05:57 -0800 (PST)
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot use my cardbus slots on -current. My dmesg is:
>
> cbb0: mem 0x5000-0x5fff irq 11 at
> device 0.0 on pci2
> cbb0: Could not map register memory
> device_probe_and_attach: cbb0 attach returned 12
>
I cannot use my cardbus slots on -current. My dmesg is:
cbb0: mem 0x5000-0x5fff irq 11 at
device 0.0 on pci2
cbb0: Could not map register memory
device_probe_and_attach: cbb0 attach returned 12
cbb0: mem 0x5100-0x51000fff irq 11 at
device 0.1 on pci2
cbb0: Could not map register mem
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> Nate Lawson writes:
> > I was testing some changes to make fxp MPSAFE and got a LOR in allocating
> > the mbuf cluster and then finally a panic when trying to dereference the
> > cluster header. Is the mbuf system MPSAFE? Is it ok to call m_getcl
>
58 matches
Mail list logo
