--On dimanche 18 août 2002 21:56 -0700 Dag-Erling Smorgrav
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
> --
stage 1: bootstrap tools
> --
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
In the last episode (Aug 18), David Wolfskill said:
> From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I'm amazed you've got a dual Pentium running -CURRENT at all.
>
> I'm not.
>
> > both of mine haven't worked with SMP kernels for months. (dual P54C
> > and dual P55C).
>
> freebeast(5.0-C)[2]
> I'm amazed you've got a dual Pentium running -CURRENT at all.
>
> both of mine haven't worked with SMP kernels for months. (dual P54C and
> dual P55C).
I am running SMP CURRENT kernel on 4-Alpha processors . No problems
for a lot of months.
Yuri.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
>Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 20:44:52 -0400 (EDT)
>From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote:
>> If I do a "make -jN world" build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end
>> up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and
>> the panic alw
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote:
> If I do a "make -jN world" build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end
> up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and
> the panic always happens in swapout_procs while vmdaemon is running.
>
> Anyone else getting this?
I'm amaz
../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "process lock" locked from
../../../kern/kern_exec.c:360
lock order reversal
1st 0xc25bb160 process lock (process lock) @
../../../kern/kern_exec.c:360
2nd 0xc03eee00 filelist lock (filelist lock) @
../../../kern/kern_descrip.c:1113
../../../vm/um
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
I get the following error when trying to compile gcc 3.3 (or 3.2) from
ports on my CURRENT machine :
/local/src/ports/lang/gcc33/work/build/gcc/gcj
-B/local/src/ports/lang/gcc33/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd5.0/libjava/
-B/local/src/ports/lang/gcc33/work/build/gcc/ -ffloat-store -g -O2 -o rmi
> > > I've been considering adding ANSI prototypes to tcpd.h, so we
> > > get more useful warnings from it.
>
> I have a local ISOfication (and lint cleanup) of tcp_wrappers that
> I've been meaning to contribute back to the author. Wanna play? :-)
Sure! Would appreciate if you send it to me )
R
> Such K&R way to declare functions sounds like an open invitation for
> bugs.
Agreed.
> > I've been considering adding ANSI prototypes to tcpd.h, so we
> > get more useful warnings from it.
I have a local ISOfication (and lint cleanup) of tcp_wrappers that
I've been meaning to contribute back
mb> The situation is very unpleasant.
IIRC, we have no active GCC maintainer, no matter you feel unpleasant or not...
-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Symptom:
===> sbin/ifconfig
cc -O -pipe -DUSE_IF_MEDIA -DINET6 -DUSE_VLANS -DUSE_IEEE80211 -DNS -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wnested-externs -I..-c
/usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c
cc -O -pipe -DUSE_IF_MEDIA -DINET6 -DUSE_VLANS -DUSE_IEEE80211 -DNS -Wall
-Wmi
Hi,
> I think if you search the mailinglist archive you will find your answer
> quickly (it has been addressed several times).
Thanks, yes found it. But with the answers I'm very unpleased. I really
really hope that we import either 3.2 or 3.3 now. Personally I'd
go with 3.2.
The fact is that
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 03:27:31PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Any plans or ideas when gcc3.2 will be imported ?
>
> Martin
>
I think if you search the mailinglist archive you will find your answer
quickly (it has been addressed several times).
--
Morten Rodal
//
// PGP ID 2D755
David,
> A fucntion which is declared with no arguments (eg sock_host())
> is assumed to be a function defined in the K&R way. Argument number
> and types don't need to be known. To decalre a function which takes
> no arguments (and which has an ANSI style definition) you say
> "function(void)".
Hi,
Any plans or ideas when gcc3.2 will be imported ?
Martin
Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH
Phone: +41 061 826 93 00: +41 61 826 93 01
PG
This seems like a new one (previous kernels kept crashing with most
recently used by none).
FreeBSD blarf.homeip.net 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #6: Fri Aug 16 12:47:10 PDT
2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/ZIPPY_SMP_WITNESS i386
GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627
Co
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 12:55:27AM -0400, Yuri Victorovich wrote:
> Is it a bug that function "sock_host" is declared
> sock_host() in /usr/include/tcpd.h
> but defined as sock_host(struct request_info *)
> in /usr/src/contrib/tcp_wrappers/socket.c ?
A fucntion which is declared with no arguments
20 matches
Mail list logo
