Re: rsync 5.x breakage

2002-06-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 02:30:29PM +0200, Oliver Braun wrote: > ==> ${REINPLACE_CMD} has different semantics on -current and -stable > > Maintainer only using -stable won't be able to get that error and fix it > _before_ submitting. Yeah, I really don't like this. At the very minimum there nee

Re: rsync 5.x breakage

2002-06-16 Thread Oliver Braun
* Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-16 20:20]: > Oliver Braun wrote: > > The problem is that sed(1) on -current fails with "sed -i.bak file", if > > file.bak already exists, but perl does not. Since net/rsync/Makefile > > uses 3 ${REINPLACE_CMD}s on one file (rsync.h), I have removed the >

making make load work for /sys/modules/*

2002-06-16 Thread Nick Hibma
At the moment 'make load' does not work in /sys/modules. The attached patch fixes that by using .OBJDIR instead of .CURDIR as the absolute path to find the module at: heidi:toor# make Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src-current/sys/modules/umass ... heidi:toor# make load

Re: Syscalls.master broken on -CURRENT?

2002-06-16 Thread walt
walt wrote: > > During the compilation of usr.bin/truss this error stops world: > > > > syscalls.master: line 55: syscall number out of sync at 7 > > line is: > > struct rusage * rusage ) ; } wait4 wait_args int > > > > The error is actually produced by the execution of > >

Re: rsync 5.x breakage

2002-06-16 Thread Doug Barton
Oliver Braun wrote: > The problem is that sed(1) on -current fails with "sed -i.bak file", if > file.bak already exists, but perl does not. Since net/rsync/Makefile > uses 3 ${REINPLACE_CMD}s on one file (rsync.h), I have removed the > backup file with ${RM} file.bak between the calls. > > ==> $

Re: Support for USB devices out-of-the-box in -current?

2002-06-16 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 02:07:37PM +0930, Wilkinson,Alex wrote: > > Does -CURRENT support USD 2.0 yet ? > No, all of the headers and support is in place for it already, but someone needs to port the ehci controller code from NetBSD. Joe msg39703/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

could sleep with "inp" locked

2002-06-16 Thread John Hay
After the recent locking working in netinet, I get this message everytime I login to the -current machine using ssh over ipv6. I don't see it if I use ipv4. ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1327: could sleep with "inp" locked from ../../../netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:536 PS. That don't mean there are not hundre

Still can't use keyboard with X

2002-06-16 Thread Tomi Vainio - Sun Finland -
Hi, I have had this same problem couple months already. Last time I asked about this I didn't get any answers. I'am running latest current cvsupped during the weekend and XFree86-4.2.0 is also compiled couple hours ago. xdm and startx are otherwise just fine but I can't write anything. Everyt

Re: Problem with gdb 5.2 from ports

2002-06-16 Thread Mark Peek
At 6:14 PM +0300 6/16/02, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >As you have requested, I installed devel/gdb52 port on my -current >system and gave it a try. It works most of the time, but I've noticed >that breakpoint set to a finction in a shared library doesn't work, at >least for libraries which have no debug

Re: Zsh dumps core after cap_get_proc() removal

2002-06-16 Thread Munehiro Matsuda
Hello Robert Watson, From: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 02:44:18 -0400 (EDT) ::> After removal of cap_get_proc() and friends from libc, zsh from the ports ::> started to dump core: ::> ::> ::> #0 0x28172333 in __sys___cap_get_proc () from /usr/lib/libc.so.5 ::> (gdb

Problem with gdb 5.2 from ports

2002-06-16 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hi, As you have requested, I installed devel/gdb52 port on my -current system and gave it a try. It works most of the time, but I've noticed that breakpoint set to a finction in a shared library doesn't work, at least for libraries which have no debugging info compiled in (I have not tested it wi

Re: Fixing "could sleeep..." was (Re: ../../../vm/uma_core.c:132

2002-06-16 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002 04:10:23 -0700 Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't know if you recieved my earlier email about a bug that I found in > execve() while working on fixing the "malloc w/ process lock held" bugs. > Here's a simpler patch. > > It fixes possible resource leaks and

Re: C++ problems

2002-06-16 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 07:31:56 +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > I just hit the same problem while trying to compile KDE stuff. In my > case it stems from bsd.kde.mk adding -I/usr/include to CPPFLAGS, causing > gcc to change its include search order. Lacking further insight, I don't > kno

Re: rsync 5.x breakage

2002-06-16 Thread Oliver Braun
[CC ports@ and current@] * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-16 13:02]: > Looks like the ${REINPLACE_CMD} patch didn't work: > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/rsync-2.5.5_1.log Fixed in PR ports/39365. But I am not very happy with that fix. The problem is that sed(1) on -

RE: Syscalls.master broken on -CURRENT?

2002-06-16 Thread Vadim Belman
On Sat, 2002-06-15 at 18:03, Robert Watson wrote: > > > During the compilation of usr.bin/truss this error stops world: > > > > > > syscalls.master: line 55: syscall number out of sync at 7 > > > line is: > > >struct rusage * rusage ) ; } wait4 wait_args int > > > > > > The error is

Re: HEADS UP: rc.d is in the tree

2002-06-16 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 15:18:43 -0700 Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Otherwise circular dependencies. > > > > That's what rcorder(8) is there for. > > It's not that simple. > > The most obvious example is the need to use DNS in order to look > up syslog hosts, and whether you s

Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build

2002-06-16 Thread Terry Lambert
Bruce Evans wrote: > > It's routine to assume that I'm going to use libc?!? > > No. It is routine to assume that users use a library that meets the > compiler's requirements (the compiler gets to decide, not the users; > it is only constrained by the relevant standards and historical > (mal)prac

Re: Fixing "could sleeep..." was (Re: ../../../vm/uma_core.c:132

2002-06-16 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:33:32 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, it shouldn't be but it is. :-P However, one should try to avoid holding > locks except when necessary to maximize concurrency. Thus it is better to do > things like malloc() and free() while not holding

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-16 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is caused by an old bogus include path in Makefiles (still needed > :-(), a bogus #include in drm and new newspace pollution in > . drm includes , although this header is > essentially user-only. now includes . > declares psignal(3) which is quite

Re: HEADS UP: prefix(8) and gifconfig(8) are obsoleted.

2002-06-16 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 16:30:01 -0700 > Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: brooks> [1 ] brooks> On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 03:14:17AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > I committed to don't install prefix(8) and gifconfig(8). ifconfig(8) > has the facilities provided by these commands.

Re: Re: GCC3.1 internal compiler error when compiling XFree86-4-libraries

2002-06-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 11:29:26AM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: > I got around this problem by (indirectly) fixing the ".c.o" rule > in the Imakefile. This patch was part of my previous mail to you > regarding the XFree86 library build process (new version of patch-z32). Thanks for looking into th

[tjr@FreeBSD.org: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/sed main.c]

2002-06-16 Thread Tim Robbins
Does this fix the recent problems people were having with sed? The examples I could dig up on the web that use the `N' command work properly with this change (same as they do on -DP1). Here are a few of the examples that are fixed: (from http://www.faqs.org/faqs/editor-faq/sed/) # 10. Delete