Re: i386 ATA is very broken after sparc64 ATA mega-commit (April 5)

2002-04-17 Thread Doug Barton
Given the impending 4.6-release, might it make sense to back off ata in -stable to the last known-good state? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: ATA errors on recent -current

2002-04-17 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Terry Lambert wrote: > My other hunch is that there will need to be a channel reserved > for "reset" commands to be queued to the disk, so that you can > queue more commands to it later (e.g. can't connect to send the > reset because of the already disconnected commands in progress). Ter

new /usr/src/share/mk changes breaks install on ports

2002-04-17 Thread Manfred Antar
The recent changes to the /usr/src/share/mk files have made installing ports broken , also doing a make install world stops at /usr/src/share/info: (info)518}make install Warning: the directory /usr/share/info does not exist! Perhaps the variable INFODIR is set incorrectly or your mtree database f

Re: i386 ATA is very broken after sparc64 ATA mega-commit (April 5)

2002-04-17 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 21:42:19 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > If you are running with tagged queing: turn it off. I got the same > > Thanks, turning tags off helps! > > It means that sparc64 ATA commit breaks tags. They work nice before it. I know

Re: 5-current buildworld breakage?

2002-04-17 Thread Makoto Matsushita
dwcjr> Yeah, your make is broken, try rebuilding make by itself and dwcjr> install it then try the buildworld again Ah, sorry. I've missed what src/usr.bin/make/str.c rev 1.19 said. I just rebuilt make(1) and confirmed that it works again. Thanks. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe

Heads up: -current sucks today :-)

2002-04-17 Thread Robert Watson
I've had four seperate and distinct panics on my -current box from yesterday in the last twenty minutes. -CURRENT appears to be somewhat unstable. Yes, this is -CURRENT; please wear a hard hat and avoid manipulating critical data using you -CURRENT box until things settle down. Robert N M Wat

Re: panic: lockmgr: draining against myself

2002-04-17 Thread Robert Watson
I just got the same panic on my -current box from yesterday, also: crash1# panic: lockmgr: draining against myself cpuid = 0; lapic.id = Debugger("panic") Stopped at Debugger+0x41: xorl%eax,%eax db> trace Debugger(c03dd41a) at Debugger+0x41 panic(c03dadc0,c9f35c30,c8f06418,0,0)

WITNESS_DDB (was: Re: Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode)

2002-04-17 Thread Robert Watson
Ah, a useful data point I forgot: the kernel has WITNESS_DDB compiled in, so it is related: Witness attempted to enter the debugger, and failed spectacularly. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services On Wed, 1

Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode

2002-04-17 Thread Robert Watson
Same configuration as before: netbooted dual processor box, local /usr/obj, swap, and nfs-mounted everything else. World build -j 8. crash1# make -j 8 buildworld >& /tmp/build.out lock order reversal 1st 0xc8e9c984 DIRHASH (UMA zone) @ ../../../vm/uma_core.c:533 2nd 0xc082aa94 PCPU KMAP ENTR

Re: USB detach trouble

2002-04-17 Thread FUJIMOTO Kou
Hmm... I investigated the trouble a bit deeper. Now I found kernel.debug with totally same configuration can safely attach/detach all devices. Is it a matter of timing or delay stuff? FUJIMOTO Kou wrote: > > Hello, > > I CVSuped kernel src at Apr. 9 and met a trouble that I cannot > detach U

Re: 5-current buildworld breakage?

2002-04-17 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:29:23AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > > Using 5-current code as of Apr/17/2002 15:00:00 GMT: > > # pwd > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn > # ident Makefile > Makefile: > $FreeBSD: src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/Makefile,v 1.3 > 2002/04/1

page fault in swp_pager_meta_build

2002-04-17 Thread Robert Watson
This is from -CURRENT a few days ago with the TrustedBSD MAC patches. Unfortunately, I don't know what time the panic occurred, so I can't say what the machine was doing. Either it was largely idle, or it was working on a make -j 8 buildworld. It's a pxeboot'd machine, with most filesystems out

OT: FreeBSD-current works great!

2002-04-17 Thread Craig Boston
Not really on any topic at all, so please ignore this message if you've got better things to do, but I just wanted to express my admiration of the hard-working developers and contributers of the FreeBSD project. I've mentioned my annoying workstation of weirdness (the one with the tricked up vinu

panic: lockmgr: draining against myself

2002-04-17 Thread Jun Kuriyama
This is today's kernel. Should I test with -DDEBUG_LOCKS? - panic: lockmgr: draining against myself cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 0100 Debugger("panic") Stopped at Debugger+0x41: xorl%eax,%eax db> trace Debugger(c029d1ba) at Debugger+0x41 panic(c029ae60,e908e780,e325cd50,0,0) at panic

5-current buildworld breakage?

2002-04-17 Thread Makoto Matsushita
Using 5-current code as of Apr/17/2002 15:00:00 GMT: # pwd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn # ident Makefile Makefile: $FreeBSD: src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/Makefile,v 1.3 2002/04/11 11:06:03 ru Exp $ # make -n neqn make: don't know how to make neqn. Stop # Anybody

DRM in the sys/ tree: looking for testers

2002-04-17 Thread Eric Anholt
The DRM kernel modules (kernel support for 3d hardware acceleration through the DRI) may be integrated into our sys tree soon. I may be getting a commit bit soon to work on this. I think getting the modules in the sys tree will help keep the DRI supported on FreeBSD even if I become less active,

Re: ATA errors on recent -current

2002-04-17 Thread Terry Lambert
Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > > My hunch, which is why I suggested decreasing the number of > > tags seen by the driver, is that the tagged queues are over > > used, and this locks the disk up. [...] > > Yes, I understand this (I for myself had already your > 'off-by-one'-suspicion - it's obvi

Re: i386 ATA is very broken after sparc64 ATA mega-commit (April 5)

2002-04-17 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 21:42:19 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > If you are running with tagged queing: turn it off. I got the same Thanks, turning tags off helps! It means that sparc64 ATA commit breaks tags. They work nice before it. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscri

Re: i386 ATA is very broken after sparc64 ATA mega-commit (April 5)

2002-04-17 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 20:29:02 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote: > > Have you recompiled both kernel and potential kld's ? > I just had wierd behavior here using old kld's... I completely remove compile/{KERNEL} contents each time, so kld's is up to date too. BTW, the bug is not on load stage but a

What does "FPU bounds check fault" mean?

2002-04-17 Thread Julian Elischer
I got this fault on a production machine.. The given fault PC was 0xc01499f0 which is the first byte of fxpintr() (??) even though coredumps were enabled, for some reason none was made. > > > > > > wss0c left this message in /var/log/messages: > > > Apr 17 08:36:55 wss0c /kernel: Fatal trap 21:

Re: sometimes make install does nothing

2002-04-17 Thread Jan Stocker
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 21:14, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 03:31:06PM +, Jan Stocker wrote: > > > twoflower# make install clean > > Check you > > a) don't already have an .install_done cookie in the ${WRKDIR}. As i wrote: no "work" dir exists, so no .install_done. > b) ha

LIBCOMPATDIR semantics mismatch

2002-04-17 Thread Eugene M. Kim
Don't know what prevented this from being caught, but: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/compat/Makefile.inc?only_with_tag=MAIN#rev1.5 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/compat/compat1x/Makefile?only_with_tag=MAIN#rev1.8 These two doesn't seem to mix together (note the las

Re: weird date/time

2002-04-17 Thread Jan Stocker
Problem solved itself... cant say why... after some reboots everything looks fine. On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 19:25, Jan Stocker wrote: > Hello, > > all my X-proggys tell me its about 15:48 (and it's true) my Windows on > the same machine told me the same after a reboot. > But a date in console will

Re: ATA errors on recent -current

2002-04-17 Thread Matthias Schuendehuette
Hello, Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2002 03:14 schrieben Sie: > Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > > I used 'atacontrol' to read the number of tags allowed: it is 31 > > (0x1F). Perhaps Soren could tell me how to force it to, say, 0x10? > > You have to modify the source code in ~line 180 of > /sys/dev/at

Re: sometimes make install does nothing

2002-04-17 Thread Jan Stocker
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 18:15, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Jan Stocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020417 06:33] wrote: > > Hi, > > > > sometime a 'make install' does completely nothing. This leads that > > dependencies weren't installed or i've to call the make again. Mostly > > this happens while defini

Re: i386 ATA is very broken after sparc64 ATA mega-commit (April 5)

2002-04-17 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 17 Apr, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > Symptoms are very strange, no error diagnostics at all > but rtld's map_object() can't map any shared library with > invalid file format > error. Programs can't start from /etc/rc too. > > Please, fix. If you are running with tagged queing: turn it of

Re: i386 ATA is very broken after sparc64 ATA mega-commit (April 5)

2002-04-17 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > This mega-commit: > > date: 2002/04/05 13:13:XX; author: sos; > Make the ATA driver compile & work on the sparc64 platform. > > breaks i386 ATA at least for following card: > > atapci0: port 0xb800-0xb80f at device 31.1 on >pci0 > > Last

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-04-17 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > In file included from >/.amd_mnt/freefall/host/d/home/des/tinderbox/src/lib/libatm/atm_addr.c:50: > >/tmp/des/obj/alpha/.amd_mnt/freefall/host/d/home/des/tinderbox/src/alpha/usr/include/netatm/atm_if.h:68: > syntax error before `VENDOR_IDT' > >/

Re: sometimes make install does nothing

2002-04-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 03:31:06PM +, Jan Stocker wrote: > twoflower# make install clean Check you a) don't already have an .install_done cookie in the ${WRKDIR}. b) have an up-to-date bsd.port.mk Kris msg37331/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

weird date/time

2002-04-17 Thread Jan Stocker
Hello, all my X-proggys tell me its about 15:48 (and it's true) my Windows on the same machine told me the same after a reboot. But a date in console will tell: Tue Apr 16 17:49:20 MEST 2002 what the hell is this? And every fs timestamps are also 2 hours in the future. Clock normally set to lo

problem building libh

2002-04-17 Thread Miguel Mendez
Hi, When trying to build libh (from CVS) on a 5.0-DP1 system I get the following error: ===> disk c++ -pipe -g -I/usr/local/include/tcl8.3 -fpic -DPIC -I/pub/devel/libh/lib/disk/../../include -Wall -c /pub/devel/libh/lib/disk/Disk.cc -o Disk.o In file included from /pub/devel/libh/lib/disk/Disk

i386 ATA is very broken after sparc64 ATA mega-commit (April 5)

2002-04-17 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
This mega-commit: date: 2002/04/05 13:13:XX; author: sos; Make the ATA driver compile & work on the sparc64 platform. breaks i386 ATA at least for following card: atapci0: port 0xb800-0xb80f at device 31.1 on pci0 Last working kernel is from date=2002.04.05.13.09.00,

Re: ATA errors on recent -current

2002-04-17 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 17 Apr, Terry Lambert wrote: >> device model IC35L060AVER07-0 >** ** > These match the test in ad_tagsupported(); I have to wonder about: > >> device model IC35L060AVER07-0 > ** Can you be more specific? >> firm

Re: ATA errors on recent -current

2002-04-17 Thread Terry Lambert
Alexander Leidinger wrote: > device model IC35L060AVER07-0 ** ** These match the test in ad_tagsupported(); I have to wonder about: > device model IC35L060AVER07-0 ** > firmware revision ER6OA44A I also have to

Re: ATA errors on recent -current

2002-04-17 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 16 Apr, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > Then I tried various combinations of UDMA100/66/33 and wc=0/1 - it > nearly doesn't change anything. If WC was enabled, I saw errors > concerning tags 0 *and* 1, whereas without write caching only tag=0 was > mentioned. I should say that my simple te