Peter Wemm wrote:
> I dont suppose you actually thought to go and have a look and see what the
> problem is yourself, rather than assigning the work to somebody else?
Nope, sorry.
I hear the latest binutils break Alpha cross compilation. My
fix is to back out the changes locally, and not use th
Could a usb afficionado fix this?
uhci.o: In function `uhci_idone':
uhci.o(.text+0x1330): undefined reference to `uhci_dump_ii'
uhci.o: In function `uhci_device_isoc_done':
uhci.o(.text+0x2fab): undefined reference to `uhci_dump_ii'
*** Error code 1
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:05:15PM +0100, Emiel Kollof wrote:
>>I've had that happen when I put typos in /etc/make.conf (i.e. syntax
>>errors or HAVE_/WANT_ variables that don't belong there).
>
>Hmm, curious. The symptoms disappeared when I commented the line
>USE_GCC30=TRUE out of my make.conf.
In the last episode (Jan 30), Emiel Kollof said:
> Dan Nelson heeft op woensdag 30 januari 2002 om 19:27 het volgende geschreven:
> >>Number of procs in top(1) shoot up into the ranges of 600+ procs (and
> >>usually defunct). Load average sometimes jumps up into the 100+ (I
> >>kid you not). I dou
Actually FreeBSD does make use of them, but in a way that doesn't cause a
problem.
Ken
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, David Malone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 12:13:07PM -0500, Cameron, Frank wrote:
> > Has this issue been addressed in FreeBSD:
> >
> > http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/Linux/35/175/
You should check the archives of the FreeBSD mailing lists before sending
a message to 4 of the lists. This quiestion has been answered several
times on the FreeBSD lists. The answer is that this isn't even really an
AMD AGP bug, it's a bug in the way linux handles mapping it's AGP memory.
FreeBSD
Dan Nelson heeft op woensdag 30 januari 2002 om 19:27 het volgende
geschreven:
>> Number of procs in top(1) shoot up into the ranges of 600+ procs (and
>> usually defunct). Load average sometimes jumps up into the 100+ (I
>> kid you not). I doubt that that is desired operation. I only started
>>
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 07:32:29PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:13:13AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 08:20:39AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > > That's easy to say when signing up somebody else to do the work.
> > >
> > > Seriously though, in spi
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Log:
> Still with asbestos longjohns on, completely PAMify login(1) and remove
> code made redundant by various PAM modules (primarily pam_unix(8)).
>
> Sponsored by: DARPA, NAI Labs
This commit and the ones immediately preceding and
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:13:13AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 08:20:39AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > That's easy to say when signing up somebody else to do the work.
> >
> > Seriously though, in spite of pretending otherwise, i386 *is* our reference
> > platform, and t
In the last episode (Jan 30), Emiel Kollof said:
> Just a question: It seems while building a port, the ports system
> somehow spawns hundreds and hundreds of copies of make (even so much
> that they start hitting system limits). What's causing it, and how do
> I make it stop doing that.
>
> Numb
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 12:13:07PM -0500, Cameron, Frank wrote:
> Has this issue been addressed in FreeBSD:
>
> http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/Linux/35/175/7626960/
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/01/24/1910227&mode=thread
This is believed not to have any impact on FreeBSD because Fre
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 08:20:39AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> That's easy to say when signing up somebody else to do the work.
>
> Seriously though, in spite of pretending otherwise, i386 *is* our reference
> platform, and the "other" platforms require people with the hardware and
> interest to k
Has this issue been addressed in FreeBSD:
http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/Linux/35/175/7626960/
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/01/24/1910227&mode=thread
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:31:14 +0200
>From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
>>--
>>...
>>===> lib/libc
>>"/usr/src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk", line 184: Inconsistent operator for libc.a
>>"/usr/
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 07:41:51AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> >Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:02:07 +0200
> >From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> >> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
> >> >--
> >> >...
> >> >===> lib/l
Terry Lambert wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> > > After the latest binutils import, attempts to cross-compile
> > > Alpha fail at the cross-tools stage of buildworld as shown
> > > below. Please also note sed(1) complaints about nonexistent
> > > ldscripts/ files. I suspect that "normal" alpha w
>Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:02:07 +0200
>From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
>> >--
>> >...
>> >===> lib/libc
>> >"/usr/src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk", line 184: Inconsistent operator for libc.
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 01:47:24PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> > No. We dont. But if Kerberos5 is asked for, then BSD telnet is linked
> > against Heimdal.
> >
> > I'm testing the fix, and will commit in a day or two.
>
> OK, great. I assume you'll import it on the vendor branch?
Yup!
M
--
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:33:43AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> >Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 05:58:24 -0800 (PST)
> >From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >cvs [update aborted]: could not find desired version 1.294 in /cvs/freebsd/src/e
> >tc/rc,v
> >freebeast(4.5-STA)[2]
>
> That, at lea
>Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 05:58:24 -0800 (PST)
>From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cvs [update aborted]: could not find desired version 1.294 in /cvs/freebsd/src/e
>tc/rc,v
>freebeast(4.5-STA)[2]
That, at least, did not occur on my laptop.
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
>
I think today is going to be "one of those days" :-(
The first hint was after I built today's -STABLE, I then fired up a
"cvs update" against my -CURRENT sources, and got:
Script started on Wed Jan 30 05:12:16 2002
freebeast(4.5-STA)[1] cd /S4/usr/src && cvs update^M
cvs update: Updating .
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 01:47:24PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> No. We dont. But if Kerberos5 is asked for, then BSD telnet is linked
> against Heimdal.
>
> I'm testing the fix, and will commit in a day or two.
OK, great. I assume you'll import it on the vendor branch?
--
Jacques A. Vidrine <[E
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:38:57PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > "Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote:
> > > Meanwhile, do yourself a favor and use the Heimdal port if you want
> > > Heimdal Kerberos.
> >
> > I think he cares more about telnet than Heimdal.
>
> Do we install the Heimdal telnetd as the
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:38:57PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote:
> > Meanwhile, do yourself a favor and use the Heimdal port if you want
> > Heimdal Kerberos.
>
> I think he cares more about telnet than Heimdal.
Do we install the Heimdal telnetd as the default telnetd
[sorry for people also on -announce getting this twice, I mail this here
since I think it's interesting for cutting-edge users]
Announcement and Call for Papers
2nd European BSD Conference
ROTECTED]
z tematem:
virus-20020130-8727 WYSLIJ (poczta zostanie przeslana wraz z wirusem)
virus-20020130-8727 OCZYSC (poczta zostanie oczyszczona i przeslana)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
27 matches
Mail list logo
