On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 19:42:30 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>> Of course. But you're missing the point: ufs is *not* a port, it has
>> been with BSD since the beginning. There is a similar list of items
>> for JFS which would need to be addressed, with the additional
I think I would rather see people tweaking the heck out of the existing UFS
filesystem and implementing new ways of getting it to go faster.
Implementing a whole new filesystem would probably take a lot of work, and
the performance wouldn't be much better anyways. IMHO, people interested in
ma
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 23:41:51 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:00:34AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 15:34:37 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:06:33AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 3:11:21 +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:06:33AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 10:30:04 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>>>
> performance without it - for reading OR writing. It doesn't matter
> so m
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Pierre Y. Dampure"
writes:
: Are you asking for specific options (my dhclient.conf is empty)? are you using a
:reservation?
I'm 100% sure it worked before the upgrade. :-(.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"
Greg Lehey wrote:
> Of course. But you're missing the point: ufs is *not* a port, it has
> been with BSD since the beginning. There is a similar list of items
> for JFS which would need to be addressed, with the additional issue of
> the fact that it was not designed for FreeBSD.
I maintain tha
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 1:08:23 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>>> FS porting to FreeBSD is actually pretty trivial(*), though some
>>> transactioning changes to the FreeBSD VFS layer consumers (the
>>> system calls and NFS server code) would be necessary to make
>>> the
Hi,All:
I love FreeBSD! But.. Can it support CD-RW disc and Simplie Chinese
Filename? A lot of files in CD-ROM that have Chinese name, how can i open it
under FreeBSD? Oh...Oh
Best Regard.
_
Send and receive Hotmail on yo
Hi, not sure quite how to do a bug report on this, and didn't see any bug
reports that matched, so I thought I'd throw it to the list to see...
Audio output on my compile of current has noise in the audio stream, it's
usually very regular... an mp3 pops at a little more than 1hz, a wav is
too fa
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Kaltashkin Eugene wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:55:03 -0800 (PST)
> Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> JE: yes ncp and nwfs are broken in -current
>
> Hm, and when this be work ?
when someone who understands the protocol can get time to
retrofit teh KSE ch
On 06-Dec-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
> That gives a hint about where to look for the clobbering conventions. From
> gcc/config/i386/i386.c:
>
> ! /* Set the cc_status for the results of an insn whose pattern is EXP.
> !On the 80386, we assume that only test and compare insns, as well
> !as S
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:00:34AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 15:34:37 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:06:33AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
> >> On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 10:30:04 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> >>>
..
> >>> and will g
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 02:07:40PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:27:54PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> > Hiten Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
> > > JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
> >
> > As long as
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 15:34:37 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:06:33AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 10:30:04 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>>>
> performance without it - for reading OR writing. It doesn't matter
> so mu
Ïðåäñòàâèòåëüñòâî Êîìïàíèè Capital Standard Corporation ïðèãëàøàåò Âàñ ïðèíÿòü
ó÷àñòèå â îäíîäíåâíûõ êîíñóëüòàöèîííûõ ñåìèíàðàõ-ïðàêòèêóìàõ äëÿ ýôôåêòèâíîãî è
áûñòðîãî ïîâûøåíèÿ êâàëèôèêàöèè ñîòðóäíèêîâ Âàøåé êîìïàíèè
Îäíîäíåâíûé êîíñóëüòàöèîííûé ñåìèíàð-ïðàêòèêóì «Áèðæåâàÿ òîðãîâëÿ
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:27:54PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> Hiten Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
> > JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
>
> As long as nobody gets the idea to import VxFS... It's dog slow
> compared to UFS+sof
Hiten Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
> JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
As long as nobody gets the idea to import VxFS... It's dog slow
compared to UFS+softupdates. :-) Dog slow even compared to
Solaris 8 UFS+logging. Of course,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 03:34:37PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:06:33AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
> > I think this is what Mike was referring to when talking about parity
> > calculation. In any case, going across a stripe boundary is not a
> > good idea, though of course
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:06:33AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 10:30:04 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> >
> >>> performance without it - for reading OR writing. It doesn't matter
> >>> so much for RAID{1,10}, but it matters a whole lot for something like
> >>
Peter Wemm wrote:
> It is not a problem. The *kernel* does not load jfs.ko, it is loader
> itself. There is no reason why a trivial non-gpl jfs reader couldn't be
> written for boot2 and loader if the need was great enough. Or have /boot
> as a seperate file system (eg: UFS or FAT32). We do thi
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > OK, I load the kernel from the JFS. I mount the root FS, which
> > is a JFS. I read the module "jfs.ko" from the JFS so that I can
> > mount the root FS, which is a JFS, so I can read the module "jfs.ko"
> > from the JFS so that I can mount the root FS, which is a JFS, s
On Tuesday 11 December 2001 11:17 am, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Since last week, I'm having trouble compiling one of the utilities
> supplied with Exim, which calls uname():
>
> gcc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro \
> -o exim_lock exim_lock.c -lcrypt -lpam
> /tmp/cc2Ye
Hi folks,
Since last week, I'm having trouble compiling one of the utilities
supplied with Exim, which calls uname():
gcc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro \
-o exim_lock exim_lock.c -lcrypt -lpam
/tmp/cc2YeHtC.o: In function `main':
/tmp/cc2YeHtC.o(.text+0x50d): undefined refer
Terry Lambert wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
> > Since then, it has become possible for the loader to load modules
> > before booting the kernel. This means that, theoretically, it would
> > be possible to have a JFS root file system. Given the strong
> > opposition to the GPL in some factions of th
Hi,
I get a panic "kernel trap doesn't have ucred" when I try to install
Linux ORACLE 8.1.7.
The ORACLE installation program is a JAVA application and only seems
to work with the included JRE (the IBM 1.1.8 JRE according to the
LICENSE file).
The JRE is using native Linux threads, and I know I
Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> Greg Lehey wrote:
> > Since then, it has become possible for the loader to load modules
> > before booting the kernel. This means that, theoretically, it would
> > be possible to have a JFS root file system. Given the strong
> > opposition to the GPL in some factions of
Greg Lehey wrote:
> Since then, it has become possible for the loader to load modules
> before booting the kernel. This means that, theoretically, it would
> be possible to have a JFS root file system. Given the strong
> opposition to the GPL in some factions of the FreeBSD project, I don't
> se
$B$"$C$?$+$$29$b$j;}$C$F$^$9$+!)(B
$B4($$?4$rKd$a$F$/$l$k$=$s$J=P2q$$$,$3$3$K$O$"$j$^$9!#(B
$B$?$a$7$K$"$J$?$N5$;}$A$r=q$-9~$s$G$4$i$s(B
$B4j$$$O$+$J$i$:3p$$$^$9$h!*(B
Http://www.if-j.net
$B=P2q$$7O%5%$%H!V%$%U!W$G$9!#(B
$B$"$J$?$KKbK!$r%F%/%^%/%^%d%3%s{(B
$B=w@-L5NA$5$i$K%-%c%C%7%g%P
28 matches
Mail list logo
