$BLLGr$$$h!"C/$K$bCN$i$l$:0B?4!"=w@-$O40A4(B
$BL5NA%-%c%C%7%e%P%C%/$,$"$k$h!*CK@-$*;n$7(B
$BIU$-0lEY;n$7$F$_$F$M!*!*(B
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Makoto Matsushita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With 5-current as of Dec/04/2001 15:00:00 GMT.
>
> It seems that this is because 'WARNS=0' line is inside of
> !defined(RELEASE_CRUNCH) clause. IMO, if an application's code
> requires to set 'WARNS=0" for build, it should also be set when
> buildi
With 5-current as of Dec/04/2001 15:00:00 GMT.
It seems that this is because 'WARNS=0' line is inside of
!defined(RELEASE_CRUNCH) clause. IMO, if an application's code
requires to set 'WARNS=0" for build, it should also be set when
building as a part of a crunched binary.
-- -
Makoto `MAR' Mat
I've just added VCD/SVCD support and that needs the kernel
and burncd to be in sync.
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
--On Monday, December 03, 2001 11:10:47 +0100 SXren Schmidt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems Miklos Niedermayer wrote:
>> I think they are idle (looking at vmstat -i), but i can't be sure.
>> However i have 2 machines here with VIA 82C596 chipset...
>>
>> atapci0: port 0xd800-0xd80f at dev
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> * Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 12:32] wrote:
> > Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > >
> > > * Dan Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 06:26] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are already cancellation tests when resuming threads
> > > > whose contexts are not saved as
* Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 13:43] wrote:
> On 4 Dec 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> > Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Please only commit working code.
> >
> > Tell that to the author of truss(1) (who also wrote procfs(5) in the
> > first place).
>
> It used to w
On 4 Dec 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please only commit working code.
>
> Tell that to the author of truss(1) (who also wrote procfs(5) in the
> first place).
It used to work. Did it not work when it was first committed? Anyway,
there are many
* Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 12:32] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > * Dan Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 06:26] wrote:
> > >
> > > There are already cancellation tests when resuming threads
> > > whose contexts are not saved as a result of a signal interrupt
> > > (c
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> * Dan Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 06:26] wrote:
> >
> > There are already cancellation tests when resuming threads
> > whose contexts are not saved as a result of a signal interrupt
> > (ctxtype != CTX_UC). You shouldn't test for cancellation when
> > ctxtype =
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 11:45] wrote:
> * Dan Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 06:26] wrote:
> >
> > There are already cancellation tests when resuming threads
> > whose contexts are not saved as a result of a signal interrupt
> > (ctxtype != CTX_UC). You shouldn't test
* Dan Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 06:26] wrote:
>
> There are already cancellation tests when resuming threads
> whose contexts are not saved as a result of a signal interrupt
> (ctxtype != CTX_UC). You shouldn't test for cancellation when
> ctxtype == CTX_UC because you are running on th
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> * Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011130 16:17] wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Louis-Philippe Gagnon wrote:
> > > If at first you don't succeed...
> > >
> > > I've encountered a problem using pthread_cancel, pthread_join and
> > > pthread_setcanceltype, I'm hoping
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 02:10:58PM -0500, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> I don't know if there's a way to stop this, but it's normal, whenever I use
> my Parallel port zip drive, I have similar problems.
For extended mode, currently FIFO+DMA, you may try :
lptcontrol -e
By this is experimental. It wo
I reinstalled my laptop with quite current current
(20011126-JPSNAP) because I need to access NTFS partition and have 32bit
PCCARD NIC (NTFS was just unbroken on current AFAIK).
When I connect with ftp to 4.3-RELEASE using 100Mbps-FDX I can upload from
NTFS partition with about 6MB/s (limited by
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please only commit working code.
Tell that to the author of truss(1) (who also wrote procfs(5) in the
first place).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the
I forgot to mention that procfs now requires pseudofs, so those of you
who have 'options PROCFS' in your kernel config will have to add
'options PSEUDOFS' if it's not there already.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe f
Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On my environment, I cannot build GENERIC kernel after this.
Umm, sorry, I forgot the other HEADS UP: PROCFS requires PSEUDOFS.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cur
* Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011130 16:17] wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Louis-Philippe Gagnon wrote:
> > If at first you don't succeed...
> >
> > I've encountered a problem using pthread_cancel, pthread_join and
> > pthread_setcanceltype, I'm hoping someone can shed some light.
> >
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
