Doctors,
Lawyers, Business Owners, Home Makers, Students, and More!
What Do ALL These People Have In Common?
They all have been opened up to a NEW way of thinking!
Our organization has helped people from all walks of life earn from 10k to 50k per week/mont
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 12:08:17PM +1000, Harry Starr wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Makoto MATSUSHITA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:21 AM
> Subject: Re: RELENG_4 builds on -current
>
>
> > That's true, maybe he only wanna
subscribe freebsd-current
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Original Message -
From: "Makoto MATSUSHITA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: RELENG_4 builds on -current
> That's true, maybe he only wanna say about 4-stable "make release"
> with (recent) 5-current box in the latter h
> Problems include "incomplete" cross tool building, header files, and
> of course, device support, in particular differences between the
> "old" vn stuff, and the new "md" device.
kris> I build worlds in a jail populated with the target release so there's
kris> no problems with this.
That's tr
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 11:58:23AM +1000, Harry Starr wrote:
> It seems to be nigh impossible to build a "previous" release on -current.
>
> Problems include "incomplete" cross tool building, header files, and of
> course, device support, in particular differences
> between the "old" vn stuff, an
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> In the non-LRP case, the percentage drop in interrupt overhead
> is ~10% (as has been observed by others). THis makes sense,
> too, if you consider that NETISR driving of receives means
> less time in interrupt processing. If we multiply the 15%
> (1
Just as a data point, vmware 2.0.4.1142 under 4.4-STABLE as host boots
4.2-4.4-STABLE guest extremely slowly, and freezes at the 'mounting root'
line under 5.0-CURRENT, as of 10/21/2001.
I left it alone for five hours under -CURRENT, no way it would move.
Brad
// -- http://www.BRAD-X.com/ -- //
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:23:17 -0400 (EDT), Robert Watson wrote:
>
> For small devices (unclear definition of small), the following (changed
> from swap to vnode from the mdconfig man page example) is broken:
>
> sproing# dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1024000 count=1
> 1+0 records in
> 1+0 records out
For small devices (unclear definition of small), the following (changed
from swap to vnode from the mdconfig man page example) is broken:
sproing# dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1024000 count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
1024000 bytes transferred in 0.234674 secs (4363498 bytes/sec)
sproing# mdco
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Mark Peek wrote:
MP>Yes, it does appear to be due to this commit. The first address on the
MP>interface queue has an address of 0.0.0.0. Here's a patch that works for
MP>me to block the messages. I'm guessing at the correct behavior so use at
MP>your own risk. At least the vo
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Harry Starr wrote:
> The problem is the new inclusion of ipfilter stuff.
>
> Make will change directory to .OBJDIR if it exists, and it does NOW that
> there is an ipfilter SUBDIR.
The support for a separate object tree unfortunately gives separate
object directories even to
úÄÒÁ×ÓÔ×ÕÊÔÅ, freebsd-current.
--
Best regards,
Vadim Zaychenko
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 92369162
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
íÁÌÏÉÚ×ÅÓÔÎÙÊ ÓÅÄØÍÏÊ ÚÁËÏÎ îØÀÔÏÎÁ: ðÔÉÃÁ × ÒÕËÅ ÂÅÚÏÐÁÓÎÅÊ, ÞÅÍ ÎÁÄ ÇÏÌÏ×ÏÊ.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
ïÔÐÒÁ×ÌÅ
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chad David writes:
>On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:00:16PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like the bug is the md driver cloning "md10ec" which it shouldn't
>> do. This bug must naturally be in md_clone(), but I don't have the
>> minutes right now to hunt
14 matches
Mail list logo
