Re: ACPI: Clock problems in -current

2001-08-05 Thread Mike Smith
> > Ok. I'm going to revert to the "safe" read code in a few minutes. > > > > Can you update and let me know if you're still wildly off? I'm having a > > hard time believing that your timer is really running at double pace, but > > I guess anything is possible. If it still does, I'll add some

Base de Datos - 1.000 Empresas

2001-08-05 Thread Empresas
Title: EMPRESAS - Base de datos de las 500Empresas más grandes, (por ventas), del país con los siguientes campos: razón social, sigla EMPRESAS - Base de datos con las 1.000 Empresas más grandes de Colombia (ventas superiores a $20.000 millones anuales), con los siguientes campos: razón soc

Re: ahc fails to attach in -current (was: snapshot installation woes)

2001-08-05 Thread Jim Bryant
Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: > > +---[ Gordon Tetlow ]-- > | On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > | > | > Sure enough, that fixed the kernel panic, but here's the next odd piece, > | > my hard drive wasn't showing up! I have a rather standard Adaptec AHA-2940 > | > d

Re: ahc fails to attach in -current (was: snapshot installation woes)

2001-08-05 Thread Jim Bryant
Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > > Sure enough, that fixed the kernel panic, but here's the next odd piece, > > my hard drive wasn't showing up! I have a rather standard Adaptec AHA-2940 > > dmesg reports that ahc0 is there. The lines from the dmesg are (hand

Linksys WDT11/WPC11 Combo

2001-08-05 Thread Steve Logue
Sorry if this is a duplicate Hello, Does anyone have any patches for preliminary support of the Linksys WDT11/WPC11 wireless ethernet combo? The WDT card uses the PLX PCI9052 chipset and shows up under -STABLE's dmesg as: pci0: (vendor=0x16ab, dev=0x1102) at 19.0 irq 12 With what I ha

Re: ACPI: Clock problems in -current

2001-08-05 Thread Daniel Rock
Mike Smith schrieb: > > > I forgot: Even if I define CLK_USE_*_CALIBRATION (and get no error messages > > after defining debug.acpi.timer_test), the Off/2 error still persist. > > Ok. I'm going to revert to the "safe" read code in a few minutes. > > Can you update and let me know if you're sti

rlogin terminal settings messed up

2001-08-05 Thread David O'Brien
For quite a while now (?3-4 months?) one's terminal settings are messed up when rlogin'ing into a FreeBSD from a FreeBSD-current one. It used to be I could rlogin from an 80x24 Xterm, and the terminal settings on the remote box would also be 80x24. Now COLUMNS=80 and ROWS and TERMCAP isn't set,

Re: ahc fails to attach in -current (was: snapshot installation woes)

2001-08-05 Thread Andrew Kenneth Milton
+---[ Gordon Tetlow ]-- | On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: | | > Sure enough, that fixed the kernel panic, but here's the next odd piece, | > my hard drive wasn't showing up! I have a rather standard Adaptec AHA-2940 | > dmesg reports that ahc0 is there. The lines

VERMOEGENSBERATUNG

2001-08-05 Thread G . Vehns
! Wichtige Mitteilung an die Geschäftsleitung ! Betr.: VERMOEGENSBERATUNG Bitte umgehend an die Hauptverwaltung weiterleiten. -- Sehr geehrte Damen, sehr geehrter Herren, die Domain „Vermoegensberatung.com“ wird zum Kauf angeboten. Fal

Re: HEADS UP: ACPI changes

2001-08-05 Thread Mike Smith
> >To test your ACPI timer, first check to see which one you have. Look > >at the output of 'pciconf -lv'. If you have an Intel chipset, chances > > Reviewing your last commit on the timer problem, I was a bit suprised > to see so little chipsets defined as "good" (just PCI ID > 0x7113

No Subject

2001-08-05 Thread Vladimir Perepechenko
auth 7f5c1c66 unsubscribe freebsd-current [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: no new snapshot on ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/

2001-08-05 Thread Wolfram Schneider
On 2001-08-03 10:27:26 +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote: > > wosch> What happens? Is -current now so unstable that we cannot make a > wosch> snapshot anymore? > > current.jp.FreeBSD.org is for you until current.freebsd.org is back > again; it's not a *mirror*, but has almost same features. Great!

RE: snapshot installation woes

2001-08-05 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > On 04-Aug-01 Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > I decided I was going to brave 5.0-CURRENT and give the snapshots > > available on current.jp.freebsd.org a try. I found a couple issues with > > installation disks (FWIW, I tried it on the lastest snapshot avail on >

ahc fails to attach in -current (was: snapshot installation woes)

2001-08-05 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > Sure enough, that fixed the kernel panic, but here's the next odd piece, > my hard drive wasn't showing up! I have a rather standard Adaptec AHA-2940 > dmesg reports that ahc0 is there. The lines from the dmesg are (hand > typed): > > ahc0: port 0x5000-

Re: Linux ls fails on DEVFS /dev

2001-08-05 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Watson writes: > >I reported this problem on the linprocfs and procfs modules a while back >while playing with a complete Linux environment under jail(). So clearly >we have a general problem among our synthetic file systems with regards to >the linux emula

Re: Linux ls fails on DEVFS /dev

2001-08-05 Thread Robert Watson
I reported this problem on the linprocfs and procfs modules a while back while playing with a complete Linux environment under jail(). So clearly we have a general problem among our synthetic file systems with regards to the linux emulator (and possibly other emulators?) Robert N M Watson

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-05 Thread Mark Murray
> According to Mark Murray: > > Can you make it so that if NO_OPENSSL is not defined, then openssl is used? > > I could of course but I don't think that having PUBKEYS by defaults (X.509 > based, not the PGP ones) is probably not very useful yet as it is a fairly > recent option. > > AUTOKEY sho

Re: HEADS UP: ACPI changes

2001-08-05 Thread Jose Gabriel J Marcelino
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 03:07:26AM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > - Changed the way ACPI timers are treated to be more pessimistic. It >looks like we can't assume that the average ACPI timer is properly >implemented. This is a pain; a "good" timer takes about 350 cycles to >read on my

Re: Linux ls fails on DEVFS /dev

2001-08-05 Thread Michael Reifenberger
On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: ... > Open a PR so I don't forget and please include how I can reproduce it > while I test. Done. In the meantime a first (but yet untested) patch to devfs_vnops.c is attached. Bye! Michael Reifenberger ^.*Plaut.*$, IT, R/3 Basis, GPS --- devfs_

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-05 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Sat, 04 Aug 2001 17:20:05 -0400, Mixtim wrote: > > Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his > > ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he > > is. Almost as bad as Linus. > > :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/ntp > > You can che

Re: Linux ls fails on DEVFS /dev

2001-08-05 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <20010805104350.A1188-10@nihil>, Michael Reifenberger writes: >Hi, >linux ls fails on DEVFS /dev because linux_getdents fails because >linux_getdents uses VOP_READDIR( ..., &ncookies, &cookies ) instead of >VOP_READDIR( ..., NULL, NULL ) because it seems to need the offsets for >lin

Linux ls fails on DEVFS /dev

2001-08-05 Thread Michael Reifenberger
Hi, linux ls fails on DEVFS /dev because linux_getdents fails because linux_getdents uses VOP_READDIR( ..., &ncookies, &cookies ) instead of VOP_READDIR( ..., NULL, NULL ) because it seems to need the offsets for linux_dirent and sizeof(dirent) != sizeof(linux_dirent)... If I eliminate the usage