Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 05:48:48AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >
> > I dont seem to be able to find some part of the base system that
> > actually *does* use libgmp. Being out of date as it is, do you think
> > it's proper to remove it from the base system and make it
Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 23:21:33, Tor.Egge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote about "Re: ps 'D'
state - ?":
> > Are `select' and `nanosleep' disk uninterruptable waits? ;|
> No. The ps command gave wrong output.
> flag = k->ki_p->ki_flag;
> - sflag = k->ki_p->ki_flag;
> + sflag = k->ki_p->
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Steve O'Hara-Smith" writes:
: I would argue loud and long that changing that *would* be broken. There
: is never a guarantee (or even an implication) that a symlink points to a
: valid directory entry (think unmounted filesystems, NFS ...). I find it hard
: to
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Karsten W. Rohrbach" writes:
: > lrwxrwxr-x 1 david wheel 13 Jun 15 06:40 .netscape/lock -> 1.0.0.127:6=
: 12
: this is actually more performant than writing ascii text into a file and
: checking the file by opening and parsing it. you simply do not have to
: fop
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I make a short patch to sharing IRQ between a PCIC and a PC Card when using
: PCI IRQ routing.
: #Does this patch help you?
Yes. I've made a larger patch and committed it that mostly works
without changes (you still need to add -I, but n
I got message below with WITNESS option. Is this safe to ignore?
lock order reversal
1st 0xc044c6a0 mntvnode @ ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:478
2nd 0xca35efec vnode interlock @ ../../kern/vfs_subr.c:1926
--
Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 05:48:48AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>
> I dont seem to be able to find some part of the base system that
> actually *does* use libgmp. Being out of date as it is, do you think
> it's proper to remove it from the base system and make it a port?
>
It is a port. Se
I was looking at PR/9233 from Dec 1998 the other day, and I saw that
the version of libgmp thats included in the base-system seems to be
very outdated (version 2.x in our tree, while version 3.x is available
at the homepage of libgmp).
After discussing this with [EMAIL PROTECTED] about it through
> netch@iv:~>ps 218 -l
> UID PID PPID CPU PRI NI VSZ RSS WCHAN STAT TT TIME COMMAND
> 0 218 1 0 8 0 1120 176 nanslp DWs ??0:02.31 diskcheckd:
>
> Are `select' and `nanosleep' disk uninterruptable waits? ;|
No. The ps command gave wrong output.
- Tor Egge
root@iv:~##ps 4986
PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND
4986 ?? DWs0:01.01 /usr/sbin/sshd
root@iv:~##ps 4986 -l
UID PID PPID CPU PRI NI VSZ RSS WCHAN STAT TT TIME COMMAND
0 4986 1 52 102 0 2292 430 select DWs ??0:01.01 /usr/sbin/ss
netch@iv:~>ps 218 -l
UID
:...
:>
:>True. It would break phk's malloc debugging features to disable this,
:>for example.
:
:Not only that, but considerning that a symlink can point into a
:different filesystem even in normal use, there is no simple way to
:validate the valididty of the name.
... or be associated with
Jens Schweikhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello fellow PR drivers,
>
> just before I hit more people over the head that have submitted PRs
> against problems on -current: my understanding is that -current users
> know what they are doing, especially that they're living on the bleeding
> edg
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jordan Hubbard writes:
>From: Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat]
>Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 22:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
>
>> Symlinks do not have to contain paths. People use them for all sorts
>> of things so it would be tot
<
said:
> against problems on -current: my understanding is that -current users
> know what they are doing, especially that they're living on the bleeding
> edge and that they must be subscribed to current@ where they shall
> discuss -current-related malfunctions. Right?
Wrong. -current users
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 03:11:21AM -0400, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> It would be better if we could allocate/free clusters+mbufs+refcounts
> under a single lock. It would simplify the API and save a boatload
> of cycles and i-cache by avoiding the mutex operations.
>
> Not that I object to the c
Hello,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 02:51:38PM +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
> Hello fellow PR drivers,
>
> just before I hit more people over the head that have submitted PRs
> against problems on -current: my understanding is that -current users
> know what they are doing, especially that they're
Hello fellow PR drivers,
just before I hit more people over the head that have submitted PRs
against problems on -current: my understanding is that -current users
know what they are doing, especially that they're living on the bleeding
edge and that they must be subscribed to current@ where they
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 22:30:58 +1000 (EST)
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BE> cp always did this (except in the broken case of a broken symlink). POSIX
BE> just clarifies it. From the FreeBSD manpage for cp(1):
Ignore me, I think I must be going temporarily insane.
--
Direc
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:27:00 +1000 (EST)
> Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> BE> > This is correct behaviour IMHO - why on earth should it fail. If I
> BE> > copy a directory containing symlinks I don't want them do vanish just
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:27:00 +1000 (EST)
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BE> > This is correct behaviour IMHO - why on earth should it fail. If I
BE> > copy a directory containing symlinks I don't want them do vanish just because
BE> > the target is unavailable.
BE>
BE> Because cp copi
--- Forwarded Message
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 04:20:46 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: support Pentium3 SSE
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NAKAMURA Kazushi)
Hello! Don't lose to Linux2.4.x!
I use FreeBSD as graphic workstation. I made a patch for support
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:34:07 +1000 (EST)
> Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BE> cp is also broken for symlinks to valid pathnames for nonexistent files;
> BE>
> BE> $ rm -f foo
> BE> $ ln -s /nonesuch foo
> BE> $ cp foo bar
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
