While doing 'tcpdump gif0' I've got:
- first (no problems here):
lama# tcpdump gif0
tcpdump: syntax error
- second:
rl0: promiscuous mode enabled
lock order reversal
1st 0xc03e10a0 bpf global lock @ /usr/src/sys/net/bpf.c:365
2nd 0xc0c38d6c rl0 @ /usr/src/sys/pci/if
On Friday, 1 June 2001 at 17:54:13 +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 13:41:57 +0930
> Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> GL> When a request or question is sent to core@ you reply with an
>
> Could you stick some numbers in here please. How much email does
> co
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 07:26:41PM -0400, Michael Lucas wrote:
> My apologies. It seems to be working now. I'd say pilot error,
> except it's a shell script I call every time I'm working on it.
>
> If it happens again, I'll capture wicontrol and ifconfig and send them
> to the list. If not, I'
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:06:42PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> It should be working and I'd like to know what's not. There is
> functionality in wicontrol that won't ever make it in to ifconfig so
> we're stuck with it and I wouldn't want to change it in -stable.
>
> -- Brooks
>
My apologi
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 06:58:47PM -0400, Michael Lucas wrote:
> After updating to yesterday's current, my "victim" laptop's wireless
> card stopped working.
>
> It turns out that wicontrol wasn't setting the card correctly. Using
> the nifty new ifconfig commands worked perfectly.
>
> This star
Hello,
After updating to yesterday's current, my "victim" laptop's wireless
card stopped working.
It turns out that wicontrol wasn't setting the card correctly. Using
the nifty new ifconfig commands worked perfectly.
This started right after pkh's changes to ifconfig to replace the
various wir
Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> >Here is a patch I have locally that would be useful for Bill Paul,
> >I think. I know, we could use "flag0" for this, but it seems to
> >me that this will be an increasingly common option in hadware.
> >
> >I know Bill had to set this manually as a compile time flag, for
"Bruce A. Mah" wrote:
>
> Trying to fix some make release problems, I've kept running into the
> same freelist corruption problems that kris and dougb experienced
> earlier this week. Main difference is that I notice when the box
> (-CURRENT from 29 May, GENERIC kernel, UP) crashes. :-p
>
> No
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 13:41:57 +0930
Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GL> When a request or question is sent to core@ you reply with an
Could you stick some numbers in here please. How much email does
core@ get ? What percentage of it (roughly) is handled immediately ?
Order of magn
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2001, David Taylor wrote:
>
> > When trying to profile ircd-hybrid-7 on -CURRENT (I tried using a pre-vm
> > madness version first, then tried a version cvsuped today), I reliably get
> > lots of:
> >
> > kernel trap 12 with interrupts
* Jeremiah Gowdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010531 17:57] wrote:
> I have been told that the OpenBSD code that is supposed to speed up some
> types of file system access up to 60x, has been committed to -current on
> 4/30. I'm wondering if there's any idea when it will be committed to
> -stable? Are t
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 05:44:17 -0700,
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
David> Committers do not need Alpha users to verify that a patch compiles,
David> Beast.freebsd.org can be used for that. Testing on a running system is
David> of course a different matter.
>>
>> I will test building
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:28:57PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
> David> Committers do not need Alpha users to verify that a patch compiles,
> David> Beast.freebsd.org can be used for that. Testing on a running system is
> David> of course a different matter.
>
> I will test building a GENERIC
On Thu, 31 May 2001 13:01:56 -0700,
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
David> On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:54:26PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >> Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio is now ready
>> >> for testing.
>> >>
>> >> The patch is at
>> >>
>> >> http://people
Hello,
I'm trying install 5.0 on Compaq ML350 and have this problem:
I can create slice, but cannot create partitions. It responds: Cannot swap
to /dev/da0s1 ...Cannot create root filesystem... Return code 1and so
on...
Where's the problem? With 4.3 I'm able to create partitions (with littl
15 matches
Mail list logo
