On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:29:57AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> >Ok, I see what's broken. I don't know how you are out of witness's though.
> >We don't have enough types of mutexes for that to happen. Try this patch:
<...>
> Since I didn't use the "-l" flag to patch, it didn't apply, so I d
On Fri, 11 May 2001 03:16:35 +1000 (EST), Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The kerberosIV telnetd is missing linkage to libpam, perhaps
> more.
The kerberosIV telnet and telnetd are missing linkage to libpam, for
about three days. Just adding that lib makes it work ...
--
Michae
Mark Santcroos writes:
>
> I have contacted the author and he made a last change in the interrupt
> setup.
>
> I have made a small stand alone package for -CURRENT, it holds the .c, the
> linux object file, a Makefile and a script to create the necessary device
> files. (If you want it in
David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:21:09AM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > John Sadler is not a Unix user, and has no experience with Unix, and
> ...
> > If you know exactly how to produce a .tar.gz under Windows that is
> > suitable for our use, I'm sure he would appreciate t
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:21 -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>
> John Sadler is not a Unix user [ ... ] If you know exactly how
> to produce a .tar.gz under Windows that is suitable for our
> use, I'm sure he would appreciate the help.
Most of the distros I've seen (Linux as well as *BSD) have t
>Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 09:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> witness_get: witness exhausted
>> exclusive(sleep mutex) Giant(0xc044a760) locked @ ../../i386/i386/trap.c:1169
>> panic: system call open returning with mutex(s) held
>Ok, I see what's broken. I don't know
John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 10-May-01 Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > 2) Is it valid that multiple DEVFS mounts over /dev are allowed?
>
> Why wouldn't it be? (Granted, it is a bit _weird_). You can do the same with
> other fs's:
...and happily shoot yourself in the foot this way. :)
I had prett
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just installed recent -CURRENT on my PC, and noticed strange things:
>
> 1) If I don't have devfs line in /etc/fstab, why DEVFS mount is still
> happening on /dev, and where?
Somewhat wierdly and unobviously, it's init that does the m
On 10-May-01 Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just installed recent -CURRENT on my PC, and noticed strange things:
>
> 1) If I don't have devfs line in /etc/fstab, why DEVFS mount is still
> happening on /dev, and where?
devfs is mounted by /sbin/init IIRC.
> 2) Is it valid that multiple
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 02:21:09AM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> John Sadler is not a Unix user, and has no experience with Unix, and
...
> If you know exactly how to produce a .tar.gz under Windows that is
> suitable for our use, I'm sure he would appreciate the help.
Ask him to use infozip/p
Hi!
Just installed recent -CURRENT on my PC, and noticed strange things:
1) If I don't have devfs line in /etc/fstab, why DEVFS mount is still
happening on /dev, and where?
2) Is it valid that multiple DEVFS mounts over /dev are allowed?
perl# mount -t devfs
devfs on /dev (devfs, local)
On Thu, 10 May 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> It looks like the recent changes wrt to libpam in telnetd may have broken world.
> ...
> cc -O -pipe -DLINEMODE -DUSE_TERMIO -DDIAGNOSTICS -DOLD_ENVIRON -DENV_HACK
> -DAUTHENTICATION -DENCRYPTION -I/usr/src/kerberos
> IV/libexec/telnetd/../../../crypt
On 10-May-01 Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 May 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>
>> <> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > I followed everything here fine until you asserted that the debugger
>> > shouldn't need any locks.
>>
>> When the debugger is running, everything else should have been
>
On 10-May-01 John Baldwin wrote:
> It looks like the recent changes wrt to libpam in telnetd may have broken
> world.
Correction, world appears to be ok, just release is broken.
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
On 10-May-01 Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I have stumbled across some nice giraffe today.
>
> Look, this is cute (transcribed by hand for your enhanced viewing pleasure):
> (sorry, no serial console handy... should be easy to reproduce though)
>
># nessusd -D
>
> witness_get
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > I followed everything here fine until you asserted that the debugger
> > shouldn't need any locks.
>
> When the debugger is running, everything else should have been
> forcibly halted.
The process and signal-related structures may be
It looks like the recent changes wrt to libpam in telnetd may have broken world.
-FW: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 09:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Deimos Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Snapshot Log
===> libexec/telnetd
cc -O -pipe -
On 09-May-01 Dima Dorfman wrote:
> [ -stable dropped from cc list ]
>
> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> On 09-May-01 Robert Watson wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 8 May 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >
>> >> That's easy enough. Well, it used to be at least. You can use 'ps' to
>> >> f
On 10-May-01 Terry Lambert wrote:
> Seigo Tanimura wrote:
>> A quick and hopefully efficient solution to those problems is to
>> fhold() struct file's first, then enter polling loop. That seems much
>> cheaper than to work on free()ing a vnode or a socket with holding a
>> process lock, provided
Seigo Tanimura wrote:
> A quick and hopefully efficient solution to those problems is to
> fhold() struct file's first, then enter polling loop. That seems much
> cheaper than to work on free()ing a vnode or a socket with holding a
> process lock, provided that struct filedesc and file are protect
Hello everybody,
I have stumbled across some nice giraffe today.
Look, this is cute (transcribed by hand for your enhanced viewing pleasure):
(sorry, no serial console handy... should be easy to reproduce though)
# nessusd -D
witness_get: witness exhausted
exclusive(sleep mutex) Giant(0xc044a7
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 01:51:25AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:37:20PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> > > Please check http://www.geocities.com/wtnbkysh/ . It should work
> > > under 4.2R. There is also some 5.0C patches but still some problems
> > > probably with in
22 matches
Mail list logo
