Alexander Sanda wrote:
>
> At 09:15 07.08.2000 +0200, Benedikt Schmidt wrote:
>
> >Just wanted to say that with the recent changes in the
> >emu10k1 driver all my problems with it have disappeared.
> >
> >There are no more "dodgy irq" messages
> >and the sound quality has improved too (no more c
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Irwan Hadi wrote:
>At 12:28 AM 8/9/00 -0400, Brian Hechinger wrote:
>>Irwan Hadi drunkenly mumbled...
>> > Sigh http://www.netcraft.com/whats/?host=www.hotmail.com
>>
>>not on all the machines however. re-run the query, sometimes you get:
>>
>>www.hotmail.com is running Apach
hi, there!
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> We should switch to using just libdescrypt and being allowed to switch
> crypt formats easily between md5 and des. My proposed solution using
> login.conf is at http://people.FreeBSD.org/~green/crypt_switching.patch,
> and it's g
Take this to -chat or -advocacy, PLEASE. This is nowhere near a
relevant topic for -current.
Brandon D. Valentine
--
bandix at looksharp.net | bandix at structbio.vanderbilt.edu
"Truth suffers from too much analysis." -- Ancient Fremen Saying
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel O'Connor drunkenly mumbled...
>
> Personally I would wire something up to the reset switch instead..
>
> Much less potential for accidentally nuking your hardware if your script is
> broken and starts toggling machines on and off like mad..
> (much less violent on disk etc too)
but how fe
On 09-Aug-00 The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> use something like netsaint to monitor those machines? and the APC master
> switch is web administered, so it would be too easy to build a quick perl
> script to trigger a power outlet correspondign to the partiular server
> that was n olonger respondi
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Irwan Hadi wrote:
> At 12:44 AM 8/9/00 -0400, Brian Hechinger wrote:
> >Irwan Hadi drunkenly mumbled...
> > >
> > > But I guess soon they will change all their freeBSD servers ;(
> > > and I wonder, how many people should be employed by Microsoft, just to
> > > press the resta
Irwan Hadi drunkenly mumbled...
>
> Including MCSE, MCP , etc ? ;) :)
bingo.
> BTW how can the administrator of hotmail determine if a server is BSOD or
> not then ?, because they have 2000 servers and I think without enough
> employees to watch the system and how can APC master switch reboot
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Brian Hechinger wrote:
> Irwan Hadi drunkenly mumbled...
> >
> > But I guess soon they will change all their freeBSD servers ;(
> > and I wonder, how many people should be employed by Microsoft, just to
> > press the restart button at their 2000 servers for Hotmail, in case
At 12:44 AM 8/9/00 -0400, Brian Hechinger wrote:
>Irwan Hadi drunkenly mumbled...
> >
> > But I guess soon they will change all their freeBSD servers ;(
> > and I wonder, how many people should be employed by Microsoft, just to
> > press the restart button at their 2000 servers for Hotmail, in cas
Irwan Hadi drunkenly mumbled...
>
> But I guess soon they will change all their freeBSD servers ;(
> and I wonder, how many people should be employed by Microsoft, just to
> press the restart button at their 2000 servers for Hotmail, in case they
> got BSOD ?
it's called the APC MasterSwitch (
At 12:28 AM 8/9/00 -0400, Brian Hechinger wrote:
>Irwan Hadi drunkenly mumbled...
> > Sigh http://www.netcraft.com/whats/?host=www.hotmail.com
>
>not on all the machines however. re-run the query, sometimes you get:
>
>www.hotmail.com is running Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.8 SSLeay/0.9.0b
>o
On 8 Aug, Irwan Hadi wrote:
> Sigh http://www.netcraft.com/whats/?host=www.hotmail.com
www.hotmail.com is running Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.8 SSLeay/0.9.0b on FreeBSD
at least on my query. Every 3rd query comes up with W2k. This time they
approaching this a bit more careful
Irwan Hadi drunkenly mumbled...
> Sigh http://www.netcraft.com/whats/?host=www.hotmail.com
not on all the machines however. re-run the query, sometimes you get:
www.hotmail.com is running Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.8 SSLeay/0.9.0b on FreeBSD
got both goin. just in case w2k didn't make t
Sigh http://www.netcraft.com/whats/?host=www.hotmail.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
At 09:15 07.08.2000 +0200, Benedikt Schmidt wrote:
>Just wanted to say that with the recent changes in the
>emu10k1 driver all my problems with it have disappeared.
>
>There are no more "dodgy irq" messages
>and the sound quality has improved too (no more crackling).
Just a quick question...
Is
The output of ``uname -a'' appears in hundreds of e-mails and PRs yet
the output format is not ideal for this (especially e-mail in
80-column mail readers) as it is a single line.
Attached is a patch for an enhancement I've made that adds a new
option ``-A'' (rather than change ``-a'') that split
We should switch to using just libdescrypt and being allowed to switch
crypt formats easily between md5 and des. My proposed solution using
login.conf is at http://people.FreeBSD.org/~green/crypt_switching.patch,
and it's going to be put into production usage relatively soon (that is,
whether or
There are many cases (e.g. apache with external sources doing crypt)
where it is necessary to have libscrypt the default crypt for logins,
etc, and libdescrypt available for linking (e.g. apache). Since the
realignment of crypt sources to the internat versions (which I generally
like), this is no
> It's not just that, if you always have to cover your behind when
> doing tsleep you may wind up masking wakeup bugs. Places like
> "vfs_bio.c" line 586 of 3182:
>
> bp->b_xflags |= BX_BKGRDWAIT;
> tsleep(&bp->b_xflags, PRIBIO, "biord", 0);
> if (bp->b_
< said:
> I've used this certificate to sign a new certificate, and Microsoft
> recognizes it and the trust chain, and will use it for verifying the
> servers identity, but not for mail.
My guess is that (regardless of the software issues involved) you've
just violated your agreement with Veri$i
* David Greenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000807 23:15] wrote:
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Greenman
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Obviously the waker-upper knows that the condition is true. Otherwise
> >the existing code which doesn't check wouldn't work. In the expensive
> >cases
22 matches
Mail list logo
