$B$4<+J,$N$*A&$aK\$r9-$/%"%T!<%k$7$?$$$H$*9M$($N(B$B!VK\$NCn!W!VFI=q$NC#?M!W$rJg=8$7$^$9!#(B
$B$B%A%c%s%9$bMQ0U$5$l$^$9(B
$B!c;q3J!d(B$BF|K\8l$rJl8l$H$7!"%(%s%?!<%F%$%a%s%H$rCf?4$K(B$B7n#7!$#8:}A08e0J>e$NFI=qNL$r;}$DJ}!#G/Np@-JLITLd(B
$B>\:Y$*Ld$$9g$o$;$O%a!<%kBj!V(Binq$B!W$H
[ -arch and -current BCC'ed for wider coverage, please direct followups to
-net and/or me ]
I have put a new copy of the zero copy sockets and NFS patches, against
-current as of early August 3rd, 2000, here:
http://people.FreeBSD.ORG/~ken/zero_copy/
Feedback would be very welcome, we haven't g
Stephen Hocking wrote:
>
> About a week ago, I complained of mysterious Sig 11s during a make world.
> After some experimentation, a PC100 DIMM was found to be better suited for a
> 66MHz memory bus in another machine, who obligingly donated a DIMM in return
> that actually works with a 100MHz bu
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: What happened to the FTP_PASSIVE_MODE environment variable ? As
: far as I can tell it is no longer supported and as a result sysinstall
: is broken. It uses Active FTP even if you select Passive FTP on
: the menu :-(
I've also noticed
Try a Promise ATA/66 controller. I have no problems
with either
ad0: 29311MB [59554/16/63] at ata0-master using UDMA66
or
ad3: 29188MB [59303/16/63] at ata3-master using UDMA66
on a very heavy disk load using either a Promise ATA/66 or
the Intel 810(E)'s ATA/66 controller. As of three or f
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 01:26:01PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Whilst the environment is somewhat safer than the command line, I'd
> > still prefer not to have passwords embedded in environment variables.
>
> Since ps(1) no longer allows users
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 08:38:17PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David O'Brien" writes:
> >Quite sorry, my contrib/gdb/ activities were suppose to be shielded from
> >users.
> And vice-versa I presume :-)
G. I should go back to bed -- that's what I meant
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David O'Brien" writes:
>Quite sorry, my contrib/gdb/ activities were suppose to be sheilded from
>users.
And vice-versa I pressume :-)
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD coreteam membe
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 08:24:30PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 10:16:32AM -0700, Scott Flatman wrote:
> > In file included from
> > /u1/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/mdebugread.c:2774:
> > mkdep: compile failed
> > *** Error code 1
> 99 conflic
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 10:16:32AM -0700, Scott Flatman wrote:
> Fresh bits supped this morning:
>
> In file included from
> /u1/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/mdebugread.c:2774:
> /u1/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/partial-stab.h:268:
>macro
>
Fresh bits supped this morning:
In file included from
/u1/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/mdebugread.c:2774:
/u1/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/partial-stab.h:268: macro
`START_PSYMTAB' used with too many (7) args
mkdep: compile failed
*** Error
When mouse cursor moved somewhere near blinking cursor in about two lines,
and all this happens at the bottom of the screen, mouse cursor starts to
blink with very hight rate. It stops when it moved outside. Looks like
some high intensity loop occupes processor so it can't update cursor with
neede
About a week ago, I complained of mysterious Sig 11s during a make world.
After some experimentation, a PC100 DIMM was found to be better suited for a
66MHz memory bus in another machine, who obligingly donated a DIMM in return
that actually works with a 100MHz bus. I think the trip from Austra
Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What happened to the FTP_PASSIVE_MODE environment variable ? As
> far as I can tell it is no longer supported and as a result sysinstall
> is broken. It uses Active FTP even if you select Passive FTP on
> the menu :-(
Sysinstall does not use libfe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
>Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On 3 Aug 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>> > Since ps(1) no longer allows users to view other users' processes'
>> > environment, I don't think it's a very big issue anymore.
>> This behavio
15 matches
Mail list logo