On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> When creating a large filesystem, it pays to increase the `-c'
> parameter as high as newfs will permit.
I always do this manually. It should probably be the default for
sufficiently large filesystems.
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PR
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 06:53:49PM -0700, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Walter Campbe
> ll writes:
> > > > HP/UX does something like this. I find it rather useful, but that may be
> > > > because I have boxes that take almost an hour to boot
Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Kenneth Wayne Culver:
> > This is the patch to make my soundcard, a Creative Ensoniq AudioPCI (an
> > es1371 chip, device id 0x58801274 rev 0x02). Can someone commit it please?
>
> Done.
There is a problem with that patch.
I'm not sure if there are older 137
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Jim Bloom wrote:
> While compiling a kernel with recent code (cvsup 22:30 -0400 July 6), I
> had some undefined symbols. I traced the symbols to netkey/key_debug.c
> and found that it did not test IPSEC_DEBUG correctly. I have attached
> a patch below.
Whee! Thanks. I'll
While compiling a kernel with recent code (cvsup 22:30 -0400 July 6), I
had some undefined symbols. I traced the symbols to netkey/key_debug.c
and found that it did not test IPSEC_DEBUG correctly. I have attached
a patch below.
Jim Bloom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: netkey/key_debug.c
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
>An Alpha my team manages with 1 TB of images on UFS takes 4 hours to
>fsck.
Sounds like a good enough reason to me to port the newer NetBSD LFS code
to FreeBSD.
Brandon D. Valentine
--
bandix at looksharp.net | bandix at stru
Its in the dmesg from my post, but:
CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (796.54-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x683 Stepping = 3
Features=0x383f9ff
real memory = 134217728 (131072K bytes)
avail memory = 127098880 (124120K bytes)
..
pcib0: on motherboard
pci0: on pci
--- Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> An Alpha my team manages with 1 TB of images on UFS takes 4 hours to
> fsck.
>
Now that's a bit of thrashing, eh?
Jordan, or anyone else who might know.. How long does it take "our" beast
(ftp.freebsd.org) to bring
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Walter Campbe
ll writes:
> > > HP/UX does something like this. I find it rather useful, but that may be
> > > because I have boxes that take almost an hour to boot
> >
> > An hour to boot? Boy... the only time I ever saw a machine take an hour to
> > boot (wh
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Thomas Stromberg wrote:
> 'panic: RAM parity error, likely hardware failure.'
>
> This one had me confused at first, because it blamed a RAM parity
> error. As this is a brand new machine (Gateway GP-800), so I first thought
> I got a bad batch. Then I realized this only happ
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> If anyone has done a make world within the past few days you should remove
> your libftpio.6 since the version bump was made in error. It's now back to
> libftpio.5.
It actually does not matter. Which major version new programs are linked
against is controlled by which fil
Charles Anderson wrote:
>
> # grep -r DIAGASSERT . (from /usr/src)
> ./lib/libutil/fparseln.c: _DIAGASSERT(sp != NULL);
> ./lib/libutil/fparseln.c: _DIAGASSERT(p != NULL);
> ./lib/libutil/fparseln.c: _DIAGASSERT(fp != NULL);
> ./lib/libusb/data.c:_DIAGASSERT(p != NULL);
> ./
Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quickie question:
[snip]
> To my (limited) understanding of this subject, it's not going to make hour
> long boot-ups. It may increase shutdown time to do things, but, sometimes
> you need to properly shut things down. If that were not the case, on
Jonathan Smith writes:
> I, for one, like the functionality, and thought it kinda already worked
> that way (or maybe I _made_ it work that way on my machines, cn't
> remember). I would like solid facts, rather than a religious/exagerated
> discussion.
I agree. I first ran into this on solaris.
Julian Elischer writes:
> > > The code's in ppp/ether.c.
> > >
> > > I'll see if I can get time to figure out what's wrong, but I can't
> > > promise anything this week. I'm too busy (we're having a FreeBSD
> > > mini-conference here in the UK at which I'm speaking...).
> > >
> > I already solved
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Rahul Dhesi wrote:
> Linh Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Can we have little green "[ OK ]"s as well? :)
> >>
> >> j/k
>
> >I hope you are joking... LOL... We don't want Linux emulation to go in
> >that direction.
>
> It's not the green that's important, it's the '
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 06:09:54PM +0200, Paul Herman wrote:
>
> > Naturally, "no reason not to put it in" is most certainly *not* a
> > reason to put it in. I would like to hear some to sway me one way or
> > the other.
> >
>
> [...]
> [hawk-billf]
I've got a source tree with -current from today, and I'm trying to build a
kernel using that source on a machine running -current from about June
10th.
I'm using a config built from the tree in question, so I know that's up to
date.
Anyway, I'm running into problems building the sound modules m
# grep -r DIAGASSERT . (from /usr/src)
./lib/libutil/fparseln.c: _DIAGASSERT(sp != NULL);
./lib/libutil/fparseln.c: _DIAGASSERT(p != NULL);
./lib/libutil/fparseln.c: _DIAGASSERT(fp != NULL);
./lib/libusb/data.c:_DIAGASSERT(p != NULL);
./lib/libusb/data.c:_DIAGASSERT(h !=
How bout a booting a SparcStation running Solaris 2.6 off a 1x CDROM? When it
finally got done, I had to sit and remind myself what was wrong with it.
-Richard
--- Walter Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > HP/UX does something like this. I find it rather useful, but that may be
> >
If anyone has done a make world within the past few days you should remove
your libftpio.6 since the version bump was made in error. It's now back to
libftpio.5.
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- Forwar
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 06:09:54PM +0200, Paul Herman wrote:
> Naturally, "no reason not to put it in" is most certainly *not* a
> reason to put it in. I would like to hear some to sway me one way or
> the other.
>
> Spoiler:
> df /disk1 /disk2 | \
> awk '/^\// {t+=$2;u+=$3;} END { print "Tot
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> And its actually very useful IMHO. Thats what rc.conf is for though, right?
>
> enable_pkg_apache="YES"
> enable_pkg_qmail="YES"
> enable_pkg_mysql="YES"
>
> and so on .. ?
Before people start going "huh?" .. that was an idea, not an outline
as to
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Mark Murray wrote:
> I'll get there (eventually).
Oh, great. Somebody do get there. ;-)
> Patches welcome :-).
I don't know if i can help much. PAM is new and completly unknown to me.
Old login was much more simlier. Maybe i'll try to integrate something
from 2.2. Can you hel
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000, Rahul Dhesi wrote:
> Linh Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Can we have little green "[ OK ]"s as well? :)
> >>
> >> j/k
>
> >I hope you are joking... LOL... We don't want Linux emulation to go in
> >that direction.
>
> It's not the green that's important, it's the
I filed a PR on this a little while ago. i386/19410.It happens on 4.0-STABLE (as
of
Tue Jun 20 19:40:01 PDT 2000), too. I have a revision 5 SBLive card. An interesting
commonality (possible connection) is that I have a Gateway system; This is a GP6-450.
Tim
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 02:26:
We have gone to some pains in the past to make the rc.d scripts silent.
Either work or fail silently.
if [ -x ... ]; do
...
done
Now, with the addition of the start/stop, there is a message output if
the argument is not 'start' or 'stop'.
The default should be 'start'. These scripts a
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 12:58:27PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
> account the 10% (or whatever) overhead that is typically left
> unallocated for performance reasons.
FreeBSD defaults to 8%.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe free
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
>
> >> Can we have little green "[ OK ]"s as well? :)
>
> >I hope you are joking... LOL... We don't want Linux emulation to go in
> >that direction.
>
> It's not the green that's important, it's the 'OK'. The way Redhat
> Linux boots, you can see at a glance which start-up c
>
> Looking through new PAMed login and PAM unix auth module i didn't find
> setting of login class params, such as resource limits, environment
> variables, etc. Do somebody working on it?
I'll get there (eventually).
Patches welcome :-).
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://w
Linh Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can we have little green "[ OK ]"s as well? :)
>>
>> j/k
>I hope you are joking... LOL... We don't want Linux emulation to go in
>that direction.
It's not the green that's important, it's the 'OK'. The way Redhat
Linux boots, you can see at a glance wh
Julian Elischer writes:
> julian 2000/07/06 08:36:00 PDT
>
> Modified files:
> sys/netgraph ng_ether.c
> Log:
> Don't forget to set our MAC address into packets we wre sending out via
> netgraph. Eventually we may need to have a separate hook for packets
> that already
Thomas Gellekum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>/etc/rc.shutdown in -current has been changed to call the scripts in
>${local_startup} with the `stop' option. This allows packages like
>databases to call their own shutdown methods and clean up after
>themselves
This will make it a bit harder to
'panic: RAM parity error, likely hardware failure.'
This one had me confused at first, because it blamed a RAM parity
error. As this is a brand new machine (Gateway GP-800), so I first thought
I got a bad batch. Then I realized this only happens with apps that try to
do sound stuff. It's also dou
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 12:53:09PM -0400, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
>
> >Many Linux distributions do this too. It seems about as useful as a car's
> >idiot light(s)... IMO, I would prefer to see useful information during
> >boot than that eye-ca
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000 15:49:27 +0200
> Ollivier Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
roberto> /src/src/usr.sbin/pim6sd/cftoken.l:47: y.tab.h: No such file or directory
roberto> mkdep: compile failed
roberto> *** Error code 1
Thank you for reporting.
I just fixed.
Index: Makefile
At 12:50 AM -0600 7/6/00, John Galt wrote:
>Is there a quick and dirty way for the label editor to detect if
>a BIOS is using LBA? This actually sounds like a setup in which
>the error condition should be alerted on placing / on a cylinder
>higher than 1024 rather than long after you can do anyth
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 06:09:54PM +0200, Paul Herman wrote:
> Naturally, "no reason not to put it in" is most certainly *not* a
> reason to put it in. I would like to hear some to sway me one way or
> the other.
How about precedent: du -c. "Hey, we could have used an awk script with
du(1) too!
Quickie question:
By implementing the 'start' and 'stop' in the local scripts, how much
should one _expect_ their systems bootup and slow down times to take?
I'm hearing whines of being to linux like, to sysv'ish and some likely
valid complaints on startup/shutdown time.
I, for one, like the f
Looking through new PAMed login and PAM unix auth module i didn't find
setting of login class params, such as resource limits, environment
variables, etc. Do somebody working on it?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote:
>Many Linux distributions do this too. It seems about as useful as a car's
>idiot light(s)... IMO, I would prefer to see useful information during
>boot than that eye-candy.
I'd prefer to buy a box of blinkenlights to put in a spare 5.25" bay and
l
> > HP/UX does something like this. I find it rather useful, but that may be
> > because I have boxes that take almost an hour to boot
>
> An hour to boot? Boy... the only time I ever saw a machine take an hour to
> boot (which does not include the POST/memory check/BIOS screen) was a
> 486S
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, David Scheidt wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Linh Pham wrote:
>
> :>
> :> Can we have little green "[ OK ]"s as well? :)
> :>
> :> j/k
> :
> :I hope you are joking... LOL... We don't want Linux emulation to go in
> :that direction.
>
>
> HP/UX does something like this. I f
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, David Scheidt wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Linh Pham wrote:
>
> :>
> :> Can we have little green "[ OK ]"s as well? :)
> :>
> :> j/k
> :
> :I hope you are joking... LOL... We don't want Linux emulation to go in
> :that direction.
>
>
> HP/UX does something like this. I f
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Linh Pham wrote:
:>
:> Can we have little green "[ OK ]"s as well? :)
:>
:> j/k
:
:I hope you are joking... LOL... We don't want Linux emulation to go in
:that direction.
HP/UX does something like this. I find it rather useful, but that may be
because I have boxes that ta
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jul 2000 10:26:00 -0400, Brian Hechinger wrote:
>
> > beancounters don't understand that computers can have more than one disk let
> > alone multiple slices. so it gives a nice total number to slap into a pie
> > chart so that you can r
> In the last episode (Jul 06), Thomas Gellekum said:
> > sorry for the late notice, I forgot to mail this yesterday.
> >
> > /etc/rc.shutdown in -current has been changed to call the scripts in
> > ${local_startup} with the `stop' option. This allows packages like
> > databases to call their ow
Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > The code's in ppp/ether.c.
> >
> > I'll see if I can get time to figure out what's wrong, but I can't
> > promise anything this week. I'm too busy (we're having a FreeBSD
> > mini-conference here in the UK at which I'm
< said:
> Maybe this isn't the right list to ask, but stepping into this:
> I bought a 30G drive recently, and I was wondering if the 10% 'rule'
> for performance is still really needed. I mean, I lose 3 _gigs_ of
> storage space, and otherwise the performance detoriates? That
> doesn't make sens
In the last episode (Jul 06), Thomas Gellekum said:
> sorry for the late notice, I forgot to mail this yesterday.
>
> /etc/rc.shutdown in -current has been changed to call the scripts in
> ${local_startup} with the `stop' option. This allows packages like
> databases to call their own shutdown me
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000 10:26:00 -0400, Brian Hechinger wrote:
> beancounters don't understand that computers can have more than one disk let
> alone multiple slices. so it gives a nice total number to slap into a pie
> chart so that you can requisition more hard drives for your machines.
This ar
> > Could you mention the locations (as in a set of paths) that are
> > hands-off?
>
> I'll generate a list and put it somewhere (in the tree?) Good idea.
To be honest, I was more thinking of the heads up message. But it was
suggested to add it to the readme in netinet6/
Nick
--
[EMAIL PROTECTE
According to Nick Hibma:
> Yes, that will work. Sorry for breaking the build. The problem was some
> stale files in my directories.
No problem, now it is broken elsewhere anyway :-)
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- Eurocontrol EEC/ITM -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Postman hits! The Postman hits! You have new
CVSup-ed one hour ago.
mkdep -f .depend -a-DINET6 -DPIM -DIOCTL_OK_ON_RAW_SOCKET -DHAVE_GETIFADDRS
-DHAVE_STDARG_H -I/usr/obj/src/src/i386/usr/include /src/src/usr.sbin/pim6sd/mld6.c
/src/src/usr.sbin/pim6sd/mld6_proto.c /src/src/usr.sbin/pim6sd/inet6.c
/src/src/usr.sbin/pim6sd/kern.c /sr
Yes, that will work. Sorry for breaking the build. The problem was some
stale files in my directories.
Nick
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Ollivier Robert:
> > buildworld is broken in libusb. Here is a tentative patch (I'm re-building
> > the world right now). The al
After the latest config/hints changes, just commenting the syscons driver
"sc" line and uncommenting the pcvt "vt" line in the GENERIC kernel config
file, a booting kernel panics after the the message "atkbdc0: .." with a fatal trap 12, page fault while in kernel mode.
This is reliably reproduc
Moin,
sorry for the late notice, I forgot to mail this yesterday.
/etc/rc.shutdown in -current has been changed to call the scripts in
${local_startup} with the `stop' option. This allows packages like
databases to call their own shutdown methods and clean up after
themselves. All the ports have
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 12:58:27PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
[whole discussion about df -h output snipped]
> You're ignoring the fact that "Size" is the total physical size
> of the device, while "Used", "Avail", and "Capacity" take into
> account the 10% (or whatever) overhead that is
At 12:41 PM +0200 2000/7/6, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> mfs:26 87M11K80M 0%/tmp
> /dev/ad0s1f 1.2G 934M 241M80%/usr
> /dev/ad0s1e 193M92M86M52%/va
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000 20:48:46 +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
> Those are block available to non-superuser I think, not "just available"
> There's some amount reserved (10% ?).
Duh. Classic mistake in disguise. :-)
Sorry to trouble.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PR
+[ Sheldon Hearn ]-
|
| As a side issue, can anyone explain these peculiar results from df(1)'s
| huamn-readable (-h) output:
|
| Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
| mfs:26 87M11K80M 0%
As a side issue, can anyone explain these peculiar results from df(1)'s
huamn-readable (-h) output:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
mfs:26 87M11K80M 0%/tmp
/dev/ad0s1f 1.2G 934M 241M80%/usr
/dev/ad0s1e
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
> I get errors like this while 'make depend' in the Heimdel code. So far,
> in libroken and libasn1.
Fixed.
> I tried looking at fixing this, but I fear the build system is too
> tricky for me to want to venture in to fix.
Actually, the fix was one
>
> Is there a quick and dirty way for the label editor to detect if a BIOS is
> using LBA?
No.
> This actually sounds like a setup in which the error condition
> should be alerted on placing / on a cylinder higher than 1024 rather than
> long after you can do anything about it.
There's actual
If anyone is able to help in verifying the new FreeBSD-current KAME
ipv6/ipsec code, especially if you have available other platform
ipv6/ipsec implementations to test against, please let me know or drop by
the #kame channel on efnet on IRC (server irc.lsl.com, for example) so we
can work together
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 09:56:43PM +0200, Blaz Zupan wrote:
>
> > this number is completely useless to me. I have to agree with Sheldon, where
> > is the use to this number?
>
> Think about doing something like
>
> $ df -c/disk0 /disk1 /disk2 ... /dis
66 matches
Mail list logo
