This thread began on -STABLE; I am moving it to -CURRENT and have
crossposted. Please, followups to -CURRENT.
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Jonathan Michaels wrote:
>> actually see bad blocks your disk is about to die. IIRC, the code was
>> suffering from bitrot and the drives that really needed it wil
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Chuck Robey wrote:
> While this whole thing is being discussed, does anyone know of either a
> configuration variable or environmental variable that ssh reads, that will
> give the same effect as the -q flag, so that I can stop seeing those
> stupid warnings about the size of
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> Can these be turned on at runtime?
>
> My concern is that build systems that compile for other machines not
> generate code dependent on the machine thats building the code.
I probably meant TARGET_CPU, but that's easily taken care of.
Kris
I
Can these be turned on at runtime?
My concern is that build systems that compile for other machines not
generate code dependent on the machine thats building the code.
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> OpenSSL includes asm code for several platforms to speed up various
> operations. Cu
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Andrew Reilly" writes:
> : Have you got "X11Forwarding yes"
>
> Ahem. "ForwardX11 yes" is what's documented and is known to work.
While this whole thing is being discussed, does anyone know of either a
configuration vari
OpenSSL includes asm code for several platforms to speed up various
operations. Currently we don't build any of this - the attached patch
turns on asm code for Pentiums and above (it relies on an uncommitted
patch to sys.mk which defined MACHINE_CPU ?= i386). Set MACHINE_CPU to
"i586" or "i686" (b
Kris Kennaway writes:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> > Machine A is 3.4-REL, machine B is either 4.0-stable or 5.0-current
> > (as of a couple of days ago).
>
> Hmm, I've just tried it with ssh-1.2.27 -> openssh-1.2.3 -> freefall, and
> it still works. Maybe it's something about 1.2
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Machine A is 3.4-REL, machine B is either 4.0-stable or 5.0-current
> (as of a couple of days ago).
Hmm, I've just tried it with ssh-1.2.27 -> openssh-1.2.3 -> freefall, and
it still works. Maybe it's something about 1.2.26..let me know what
happens aft
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> Sorry, no dice :( It doesn't seem to be that. All I've got left is
> maybe sending out every bit of configuration info, and maybe someone
> could figure it out. I doubt it, though, so I'm not gonna.
Silly question, but have you tried ask
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> This only happens when going from machine A -> machine B -> freefall.
> Machine A is 3.4-REL, machine B is either 4.0-stable or 5.0-current
> (as of a couple of days ago).
Hmm. It works for me going 5.0-C -> 5.0-C -> freefall using
openssh both times. P
Hello!
After CVSup i tryed to rebuild my 5.0...
===> librsausa
mkdir: openssl: File exists
cp /usr/src/secure/lib/librsausa/../libcrypto/opensslconf-i386.h openssl/opensslconf.h
*** Error code 1
1 error
*** Error code 2
1 error
*** Error code 2
1 error
*** Error code 2
1 error
*** Error code 2
1
===> bin/csh
install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 csh /syv/release/bin
/syv/release/bin/tcsh -> /syv/release/bin/csh
===> bin/csh/nls
===> bin/csh/nls/finnish
install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 tcsh.cat
/syv/release/../usr/share/nls/fi_FI.ISO_8859-1/tcsh.cat
install: /syv/release/../usr/shar
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Dirk Roehrdanz wrote:
[ snippage ]
> I get this message too whenever I mount a mfs filesystem.
> The line in /etc/fstab is:
> /dev/da0s1b /tmp mfs rw,async,-s327680 0
>
> The output of "ls -l /dev/*da0s1b" is:
> crw-r- 1 root operator 13, 0x00
Archie Cobbs wrote:
>
>
> > What happens if you use TELNET to get to machine B?
> > does the ssh to freefall still misbehave?
> > (in other words.. what if machine A is not involved?)
>
> Aha.. that works! (note: home directory is the same on A or B)
>
Looks like some of the environment that
Julian Elischer writes:
> I presume the public key at freefall matches the public key
> at machine-B. Try connecting back in the other direction
> so that the 'known machines' settings are tested.
Can't do that because of the firewall..
> > This only happens when going from machine A -> machine
Archie Cobbs wrote:
>
I presume the public key at freefall matches the public key
at machine-B. Try connecting back in the other direction
so that the 'known machines' settings are tested.
>
> This only happens when going from machine A -> machine B -> freefall.
> Machine A is 3.4-REL, machine
Mike Pritchard writes:
> > Kris Kennaway writes:
> > > > $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits
>vs. announced 1024.
> > > > Warning: This may be due to an old implementation of ssh.
> > > > Warning: identity keysize mi
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Ben Smithurst wrote:
> X11 forwarding is working for me now, but wasn't when I first tried
> it. I found I was explicitly setting XAUTHORITY=~/.Xauthority in my
> .zshrc file, so the temporary bits created in /tmp/ssh-foo/cookies by
> ssh weren't being picked up. I missed t
Nickolay Dudorov wrote:
>
>
> There is some problems with "/boot/loader". You can just
> hit the key due to "|/-..." propelling and load "/boot/loader.old"
> instead of "/boot/loader". (And the first thing I make on the
> booted system - "cp /boot/loader.old /boot/loader.good" ;-)
Ah, m
I use a 4.0-RELEASE machine as my build machine, and have been
experiencing intermittent build fails in the perl code for a while. It
does not happen consistently, and when it does, does not give a useful
error message of any sort. I compile with -j, usually between 3 and 6
processes. Here's t
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Chris Piazza wrote:
>
>> It's working from my 5.0 box to my 4.0-R box across town, too.
>>
>> -Chris
>
> Okay, give me some more info, please:
>
> You're going from the 5.0 box to the 4.0 box. What's the /etc/hosts
> look like on the 5.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 01:54:23PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> ===> bin/csh/nls
> cd /usr/src/bin/csh/nls ; make afterdistribute DESTDIR=/R/stage/trees/bin
> ===> bin/csh/nls/finnish
> make: don't know how to make distribute. Stop
Fix commited.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
===> bin/csh/nls
cd /usr/src/bin/csh/nls ; make afterdistribute DESTDIR=/R/stage/trees/bin
===> bin/csh/nls/finnish
make: don't know how to make distribute. Stop
*** Error code 2
Stop in /usr/src/bin/csh/nls.
*** Error code 1
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
>
> What man ssh(1) doesn't tell you in this paragraph is that even
> if you say "ForwardX11 yes" in ~/.ssh/config, you will not get
> a proxy X session unless the server has "X11Forwarding yes" in
> /etc/ssh/sshd_config. The default that my system confi
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Andrew Reilly" writes:
> : Have you got "X11Forwarding yes"
>
> Ahem. "ForwardX11 yes" is what's documented and is known to work.
According to the documentation, ForwardX11 yes is for ssh configs and
X11Forwarding yes is
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Andrew Reilly" writes:
: Bzzzt. Man sshd(8):
Ah, I'm confused and came in on the middle of a conversation. Never
mind.
: That's what I found out as a result of this conversation.
That's good to know!
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 01:25:20AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Andrew Reilly" writes:
> : Have you got "X11Forwarding yes"
>
> Ahem. "ForwardX11 yes" is what's documented and is known to work.
Bzzzt. Man sshd(8):
X11Forwarding
Specifies whethe
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 05:05:11PM -0700, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Kris Kennaway writes:
> > > $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits
>vs. announced 1024.
> > > Warning: This may be due to an old implementation of ssh.
> > >
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Andrew Reilly" writes:
: Have you got "X11Forwarding yes"
Ahem. "ForwardX11 yes" is what's documented and is known to work.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I've tracked down what seems to be a bug in the new version of OpenSSL I
> imported a week ago which affects the alpha platform. It *looks* like a
> bug in OpenSSL's "bignum" library which might not have shown up for users
> of the default openssl distr
30 matches
Mail list logo