On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 12:23:35PM -0500, Kenneth Wayne Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I was just wondering if anyone else was having a problem making the world
> on -CURRENT right now? I don't remember the exact error I got because
> I'm at work, and my machine is at home, but for the last
From: Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 31, 1999 6:29 AM
Subject: multiple cd devices
> Anyhow, getting the kernel to recognize cd1 was no problem, but getting
> /dev/MAKEDEV to do that was a hairy PITA. I couldn't locate, in either
> cd(4) or cd(9),
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> The way certain devices, like cd with its monotonically increasing counter
> where devices are probed in order and assigned device based on precedence
> and not hardwiring/controller connection, work is consistent between
> the kernel and MA
The way certain devices, like cd with its monotonically increasing counter
where devices are probed in order and assigned device based on precedence
and not hardwiring/controller connection, work is consistent between
the kernel and MAKEDEV. If you have 2 cd devices, you have cd0 and cd1,
so MAKE
I've been doing a lot of neatening up here, and one of the tasks was to
get both of the cdrom drives I have (one per machine) moved over so that
they are on the same machine. This was so I can use the one that's a
writer in conjuntion with a reader, and do duplication.
Anyhow, getting the kernel
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Last time I checked (I haven't moved to the latest gcc, so I can't
> confirm it there), one significant difference between 'cc -E' and
> /usr/libexec/cpp was that the latter would read from a pipe, whilst
> the former wouldn't. This can make converting
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter
Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last time I checked (I haven't moved to the latest gcc, so I can't
> confirm it there), one significant difference between 'cc -E'
> and /usr/libexec/cpp was that the latter would read from a pipe,
> whilst the former would
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Swingle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a laptop that's giving me all kinds of pccard headaches
> and I'd like to get it back to -current from the begining of the
> month before I was having these problems. Is there any reason why I
> couldn't make world
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Steve Price wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
>
> # Here is the answer I was given by somebody on this list last week.
> #
> # #/etc/pam.conf
> # # tricky tricky forgive me
> # xserver authsufficient pam_permit.so no_use
> #
Hey all,
I've got a laptop that's giving me all kinds of pccard headaches and I'd
like to get it back to -current from the begining of the month before I
was having these problems. Is there any reason why I couldn't make world
from some time around 12/8/99 on -current from yesterday evening? Woul
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
# Here is the answer I was given by somebody on this list last week.
#
# #/etc/pam.conf
# # tricky tricky forgive me
# xserver authsufficient pam_permit.so no_use
# # If we don't match anything else, default to using getp
On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 04:43:47PM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> Here is the answer I was given by somebody on this list last week.
>
> #/etc/pam.conf
> # tricky tricky forgive me
> xserver authsufficient pam_permit.so no_use
> # If we don't match anything else, d
Here is the answer I was given by somebody on this list last week.
#/etc/pam.conf
# tricky tricky forgive me
xserver authsufficient pam_permit.so no_use
# If we don't match anything else, default to using getpwnam().
other authrequiredpam_unix.so
try_first
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Dave J. Boers wrote:
# I'm having the same problem. Cvsupped and recompiled -current just a few
# hours ago. Then I recompiled X 3.3.5 and installed it. Now I can't start X
# anymore either. Lines containing "Password:" just keep scrolling over my
# terminal. The password li
On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 06:28:02PM -0600, Steve Price wrote:
> For some reason now I can't startx(1) as either myself or root.
> I type startx and the PAM auth routines loop forever printing
> out 'Password:'. I comment out the last two lines in /etc/pam.conf
> and I get an authentication failure
Last time I checked (I haven't moved to the latest gcc, so I can't
confirm it there), one significant difference between 'cc -E' and
/usr/libexec/cpp was that the latter would read from a pipe, whilst
the former wouldn't. This can make converting to 'cc -E' a
non-trivial exercise.
Peter
To Uns
I build world this morning, and it built fine.
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Wayne Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 12:23 PM
Subject: -CURRENT make world broken
> I was just wondering if anyone else was having a problem m
Last nite , I managed to compile all of XFree86 3.9.17 with no
compiler bugs from gcc.
/usr/local/bin/gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-portbld-freebsd4.0/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96 19991110 (experimental)
Enjoy
--
Amancio Hasty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubsc
I was just wondering if anyone else was having a problem making the world
on -CURRENT right now? I don't remember the exact error I got because
I'm at work, and my machine is at home, but for the last 3 weeks whenever
I try to make world, it dies in a different place, I've tried every day,
so I'm
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, David Gilbert wrote:
>
> > Bill> Reboot. I don't know why it works, but it does. :->
> >
> > Right... I already knew that, but it's a manual reboot... and this is
> > "suboptimal" (ie. requiring operator intervention).
>
> Indeed
On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 11:14:58AM -0500, David Gilbert wrote:
> > "Bill" == Bill Fumerola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Bill> On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, David Gilbert wrote:
> >> Related to my last post, the system came up and started to fsck.
> >> It appears, with current, that the system will
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, David Gilbert wrote:
> Bill> Reboot. I don't know why it works, but it does. :->
>
> Right... I already knew that, but it's a manual reboot... and this is
> "suboptimal" (ie. requiring operator intervention).
Indeed.
--
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - BF1560 - compu
> "Bill" == Bill Fumerola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bill> On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, David Gilbert wrote:
>> Related to my last post, the system came up and started to fsck.
>> It appears, with current, that the system will refuse to r/w mount
>> root even though the fsck has complete successfull
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, David Gilbert wrote:
> Related to my last post, the system came up and started to fsck. It
> appears, with current, that the system will refuse to r/w mount root
> even though the fsck has complete successfully. Is this an rc-file
> out-of-date issue, or has something chang
Related to my last post, the system came up and started to fsck. It
appears, with current, that the system will refuse to r/w mount root
even though the fsck has complete successfully. Is this an rc-file
out-of-date issue, or has something changed in the kernel.
Root is an 18G SCSI (da0s1a) on
Looks like the leasing stuff in NFS has a little buglet...
(This is with 4.0-CURRENT cvsup'd a few days before Christmas)
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x12ffa8d4
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8
While compiling a new kernel after the KERNEL -=> _KERNEL change i found
out that /usr/src/sys/crypto/des/des_locl.h still has a KERNEL check
instead of _KERNEL which breaks kernel-building. I changed it myself and
kernel compiled cleanly again.
This is with crypto checked out from cvsup2.interne
I just noticed that after my make installworld my postfix install was
"busted" ... I found out that apparently there has been installed a new
binary called mailwrapper that replaced my existing sendmail-symlinks
(created by postfix ports' make replace command) with new symlinks to
mailwrapper.
I
Greg Lehey wrote in message ID
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Again, news for me. You can stop a revive and restart it at a later
> time; the state information includes the revive pointer. But the only
> real answer to this one would be to see the statistics.
Well, I deleted the plex and tried again:
> current's new ppp discards the "#0001"-part from my
> german telekom account and makes it impossible to
> connect to my provider.
This should work ok now. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> It worked ~ 2 weeks ago with current and works also
> in 3.4-Stable.
>
> Werner
--
Brian <[EMAIL PROTECT
Greg Lehey wrote:
>
> > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/usr.bin/colldef created for
> > /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef
> > yacc -d /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef/parse.y
> > *** Signal 12
>
> This looks like you've updated your source tree and have not built a
> new kernel. Try the new kernel first, then the
juan wrote:
>
> yacc -d /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef/parse.y
> *** Signal 12
>
> Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef.
Are you doing anything special? If not, try cleaning /usr/obj first and
make sure your source tree is ok.
--
Marcel Moolenaarmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCC Inte
FreeBSD mailing list wrote:
>
> i===> libroken
> cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libroken/../../../crypto/kerberosIV/include
>-I/usr/obj/usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libroken/../../include
>-I/usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libroken/../../../crypto/kerberosIV/lib/roken
>-I/usr/obj/usr/src/kerberosI
Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 December 1999 at 21:54:42 -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote:
> >
> > Otay, please tell me how to fix:
> >
> > ===> usr.sbin/ifmcstat
> > cc -O -pipe -DINET6 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c
> > /usr/src/usr.sbin/ifmcstat/ifmcstat.c
> > gzip -cn /usr/src/us
> "David O'Brien" wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 11:37:18AM -0800, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > > This is the scoop.
> > ..snip..
> > > gcc -v
> > > Using builtin specs.
> > > gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
> > ..snip..
> > > Without -O or -O2 the program compiles okay.
> >
> > What othe
"David O'Brien" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 11:37:18AM -0800, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > This is the scoop.
> ..snip..
> > gcc -v
> > Using builtin specs.
> > gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
> ..snip..
> > Without -O or -O2 the program compiles okay.
>
> What other platforms w/gcc 2.95
>
> Otay, please tell me how to fix:
>
> ===> usr.sbin/ifmcstat
> cc -O -pipe -DINET6 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/ifmcstat/ifmcstat.c
> gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/ifmcstat/ifmcstat.8 > ifmcstat.8.gz
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/ifmcstat/ifmcstat.c: In function `main':
> /us
37 matches
Mail list logo
