While trying to compile the latest version of XFree86 I found the following
compiler bug.
{root} gcc -v
Using builtin specs.
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
I assume that this an old version of gcc...
xc/programs/Xserver/Xext
cc -c -pipe -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Dasm=__asm -Wall -Wpointer
:...
:> I'm pretty sure that the box was getiting receive interrupts because
:> every time I sent a packet to it from the outside systat -vm showed
:> a PCI interrupt for the network device. However 'netstat -in 1' did
:> not show the statistics for the received packets until 64 h
Andreas Klemm wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 01:11:06PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > Hi !
> > >
> > > Some time ago I fetched your vmware port from internet.
> > > I moved to -current because staroffice5 there is able to run
> > > with a SMP kernel.
> > >
> > > When trying to run vmware I e
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > Hi !
> >
> > Some time ago I fetched your vmware port from internet.
> > I moved to -current because staroffice5 there is able to run
> > with a SMP kernel.
> >
> > When trying to run vmware I encounter the following problems:
> >
> > This message shows up immediately afte
I'm trying to get the latest version of OSS (3.9.3a) working under
-current and having very little success.
When I try running soundconf, I get the following messages:
kldload: can't load /usr/opt/oss/oss_mod: Exec format error
Cannot load OSS driver module.
Dec 25 21:02:46 hellboy /kernel: lin
On Thursday, 23 December 1999 at 21:29:08 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> seems to work fine,
> except that now we don't have block devices any more
> so every time it gets stuff off disk, it's REALLY SLOW.
>
> I guess a virtual machine is the "App that no-one could put their finger
> on" that r
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes:
>On Fri, Dec 24, 1999 at 09:14:01PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes:
>>
>> >Should fsck be changed to set the hotroot flag if the block device
>> >is given?
>>
>> I deliberately didn't do
On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 02:25:40PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > Too bad, that the vmware port isn't part of the ports tree and
> > doesn't have a version number in the file name. Otherwise it
> > would be more easily possible to communicate the exact software
> > release status.
>
> I think the i
> Too bad, that the vmware port isn't part of the ports tree and
> doesn't have a version number in the file name. Otherwise it
> would be more easily possible to communicate the exact software
> release status.
I think the idea just now is to avoid having people that complain quickly
like you a
> On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 01:11:06PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > Check the console; you have a mismatch somewhere inbetween the vmmon
> > module and the Linux module, or between the vmmon module and your kernel.
>
> Well, I think I had an outdated vmware port.
> I grabbed it new from the minds
On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 02:15:07PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 01:11:06PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > > Hi !
> > > >
> > > > Some time ago I fetched your vmware port from internet.
> > > > I moved to -current because staroffice5 there is able to run
> > > > with a SMP
On Fri, Dec 24, 1999 at 09:14:01PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes:
>
> >Should fsck be changed to set the hotroot flag if the block device
> >is given?
>
> I deliberately didn't do this for several reasons:
>
> 1. It would need to kno
On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 01:11:06PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> Check the console; you have a mismatch somewhere inbetween the vmmon
> module and the Linux module, or between the vmmon module and your kernel.
Well, I think I had an outdated vmware port.
I grabbed it new from the mindspring webser
> On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 01:11:06PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > Hi !
> > >
> > > Some time ago I fetched your vmware port from internet.
> > > I moved to -current because staroffice5 there is able to run
> > > with a SMP kernel.
> > >
> > > When trying to run vmware I encounter the following
On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 01:11:06PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > Hi !
> >
> > Some time ago I fetched your vmware port from internet.
> > I moved to -current because staroffice5 there is able to run
> > with a SMP kernel.
> >
> > When trying to run vmware I encounter the following problems:
> >
On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 10:03:56PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> Some time ago I fetched your vmware port from internet.
> I moved to -current because staroffice5 there is able to run
> with a SMP kernel.
>
> When trying to run vmware I encounter the following problems:
>
> This message shows up
> Hi !
>
> Some time ago I fetched your vmware port from internet.
> I moved to -current because staroffice5 there is able to run
> with a SMP kernel.
>
> When trying to run vmware I encounter the following problems:
>
> This message shows up immediately after program start:
>
> kldload: can't
Hi !
Some time ago I fetched your vmware port from internet.
I moved to -current because staroffice5 there is able to run
with a SMP kernel.
When trying to run vmware I encounter the following problems:
This message shows up immediately after program start:
kldload: can't load /usr/local/lib/v
> On Dec 24, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > On Dec 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > On -CURRENT: Fri Dec 24 08:38:50 EST 1999,
> > > > I'm getting the following when I enabled pcm and sbc in the kernel:
> > > >
> > > > unknown0: at port 0x220-0x22f irq 5 drq 1,0 on isa0
> > > > sbc0: at port 0x388
We aren't doing mcast at this time. If there's anyone from Nortel
lurking behind this list, UCLA CS is pretty close to throwing out
the Accelars due to a lack of tech support response.
No, UCLA CS is not capable of doing department-wide mcast because
of a set of peculiar bugs in the Accelar's cod
On Dec 24, Mike Smith wrote:
> > On Dec 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On -CURRENT: Fri Dec 24 08:38:50 EST 1999,
> > > I'm getting the following when I enabled pcm and sbc in the kernel:
> > >
> > > unknown0: at port 0x220-0x22f irq 5 drq 1,0 on isa0
> > > sbc0: at port 0x388-0x38f on isa0
According to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> (I couldn't find the device to create in /dev except for /dev/snd0 and
> /dev/snd1, so that is what I made.)
Bad. Just use "sh MAKEDEV snd0". It will create suitable devices (old Voxware,
pcm and newpcm all use the same devices) for any sound card.
--
Ollivier
James Howard wrote:
>
> On Sun, 26 Dec 1999, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> > > Yes, but isn't this stuff GPL'd? The fsck_ext2fs program from Open- or
> > > NetBSD is not.
> >
> > Sure. So is ext2fs for FreeBSD, and some other small programs like gcc.
>
> Is the ext2fs implementation in Net or Open
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
> BTW, is Real still distributing RealPlayer 5.0 or G2 for linux? The
> URI in the Makefile of the port looks obsolete... (I had downloaded
> the players at my home)
Yes, this is out of date. I have a number of PRs assigned to me about
this which I hav
Hi,
lint:
---snip---
(156) netchild@ttyp2 > lint /usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/xlint/xlint.c
xlint.c:
cpp: Invalid option `-undef'
(157) netchild@ttyp2 > which lint
/usr/bin/lint
(158) netchild@ttyp2 > gcc -v
Using builtin specs.
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
---snip---
Patch attached.
"p
On Sun, 26 Dec 1999, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Yes, but isn't this stuff GPL'd? The fsck_ext2fs program from Open- or
> > NetBSD is not.
>
> Sure. So is ext2fs for FreeBSD, and some other small programs like gcc.
Is the ext2fs implementation in Net or Open GPL'd? If not, copy it too.
Jamie
KATO Takenori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only one #ifdef in the diff makes it needless. In this patch,
I didn't realize the difference in type of bus_space_handle_t. So,
bus.h needs to be separated into bus_at386.h and bus_pc98.h.
---+
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999, Alex wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> >
> > The current release of the ext2fs utilities seems to be
> > ef2fsprogs.1.17.tar.gz. Available in most Linux archies. Requires a
> Yes, but isn't this stuff GPL'd? The fsck_ext2fs program from Open- or
> NetBSD is not.
Sure. So
On 24 Dec, Bryan Liesner wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> <>unknown0: at port 0x220-0x22f irq 5 drq 1,0 on isa0
> <>sbc0: at port 0x388-0x38f on isa0
> <>sbc0: alloc_resource
> <>device_probe_and_attach: sbc0 attach returned 6
> <>unknown1: at port 0x208-0x20f on isa0
> While this can be moved into the man page, I don't see how a
> message like this can significantly slow down booting, unless you have a
> slow serial console. However, a pointer is still useful; I'd suggest a
> shorter message like:
>
> ad0: DMA disabled: See ad(4) man page for possible
30 matches
Mail list logo
