join
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In the last episode (Nov 20), Donn Miller said:
> Thanks. Here is what I tried:
>
> root@lc186 floppies# dd obs=16k conv=osync if=color.gz
> of=/dev/rfd0
> 2453+1 records in
> 77+0 records out
> 1261568 bytes transferred in 50.994527 secs (24739 bytes/sec)
>
> It appears to have worked. I gues
Is anyone seeing a problem like the one below? This is happening to me on
quite a few binaries that used to be gdb'able before I installed a new
world on the 13th...
[by-tor@volatile:~/mms-0.90$]: gdb ./mms
GNU gdb 4.18
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered b
On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 12:48:21PM -0500, Byung Yang wrote:
> I lowered the optimization level from -O6 to -O and now it shows the cpu
Offical GCC Project stance is that levels above -O3 are not offically
supported. Above -O3 are experimental (if they are even paid attention
to). Levels above -
> > > > Does anybody can explain why kernel with NewATA driver booted on machine
> > > > with ISA based IDE adapter trying to mount wd* as root f/s, while
> > > > exactly *the same* kernel booted on PCI based mobo mounts ad* as root?
> > >
> > > /etc/fstab ?
> >
> > No, I do not talking about /et
> As Andrey A. Chernov wrote ...
> > What this means? What actions required?
> > It was a problem recently which cause my kernel paniced
> > after boot, but now I got this diagnostic instead of panic:
> >
> > /kernel: Waiting 2 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
> > /kernel: Creating DISK da0
> >
> > The diagnostic is relatively harmless, but it suggests that /etc/fstab
> > is wrong.
>
> Here is fstab line, please point what is wrong?
> /dev/da0s4a / ufs rw,userquota 1 1
I have no idea; it'd be handy to know what it's trying to mount that's
failing, but I do
Back when we were closing in on the release date for 3.3, I sent
the following message. As we now close in on the release date
for 3.4, I thought I'd send it again, seeing that both of the
problem reports are still marked "open", and neither of the two
patches have been applied yet. (not even to
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, J Wunsch wrote:
> Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Too many people have objected. I didn't make my case clearly enough,
> > but because enough people of have raised issues, the default won't
> > be changed.
>
> Too bad. I think your idea was absoultely righ
"Rodney W. Grimes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you give me a model of a QIC drive that has the ``can't write 2
> FM's'' and I'll see if I can find one so that I can see this problem
> first hand and propose a solution to it.
The problem with QIC drives is that they only support writing at B
Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Too many people have objected. I didn't make my case clearly enough,
> but because enough people of have raised issues, the default won't
> be changed.
Too bad. I think your idea was absoultely right, and i'm rather tired
myself to have to `fix' it for
Hi,
I am running 4.0-current of:
FreeBSD gmarco.eclipse.org 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Nov 18
09:33:43 CET
1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/GMARCO i386
But I have now a lot of errors (as you can see in this logs) on my scsi chain.
I had never experienced such things
Could someone with MSS compatible non-Yamaha card (AD1848, Opti 931, Gus
PnP, ...) and using newpcm please check out the patch in PR kern/14634 and
report to me if the mixer synth and CD are correct after the patch?
If not, could you please try the below patch and see if this is a no-op on
your s
I have a WaveLan card and a PCI Compex NE2000 compatible in the same
machine. For the Wavelan I need to have pccard compiled in. The NE2000 is
not recognized by the kernel, after closer examination I see that the
compilation of if_ed_pci.c is conditional on pccard (if pccard is in the
system, if_e
Mike Smith wrote:
> > > > > Does anybody can explain why kernel with NewATA driver booted on machine
> > > > > with ISA based IDE adapter trying to mount wd* as root f/s, while
> > > > > exactly *the same* kernel booted on PCI based mobo mounts ad* as root?
> > > >
> > > > /etc/fstab ?
> > >
> >
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Blaz Zupan wrote:
> With the following patch my kernel compiles and the NE2000 is correctly
> probed. I guess the reason why this #ifdef has been put in has since
> disappeared.
I suspect so. Fixed.
> *** sys/dev/ed/if_ed_pci.c.orig Fri Oct 15 05:12:47 1999
> --- sys/
-On [19991120 04:01], Byung Yang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>as I see the source code, it is not doing what it is supposed to do.. any
>suggestions? (it's not a big deal but still it's a bug)
>I did not modify any of the source codes.
I think someone else suggested loweri
On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> If you're using the ata driver, please remove the ad_sleep() call
> at the bottom of the adopen() in ata-disk.c and see if that
> helps you.
Yes, i am using ata driver, but your suggestion didn't help. Still
same story. Crash dumps are available..
> if they used an MII transceiver, then it should work okay, but if
> not you could be in for trouble. I wish I didn't have to say that,
> but I just don't have the hardware to test with.
You know what I tell people who use that excuse... ;)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
Sorry about the multiple posts. I have @home to thank for this. The mail
server said the connection was timing out. Apparently not.
I am quite well aware of the mailing list etiquette. I read through many of
them frequently.
The question itself should remain in the hackers list. Support for
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> 1. /usr/libexec/cpp now has no predefined symbols like __FreeBSD__,
>>which makes imake unable to detect OS type automatically.
>
>I'm certain XFree86 should build using gcc -E and not the C preproces
So the question is: should csh/tcsh use setproctitle() or should su be fixed
to not use "_"?
On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 03:18:27AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> With recent -current I got
>
> _su (tcsh)
> \___
>
> in "ps ax" instead of
>
> -su (tcsh)
>
> as before.
>
> >From su.c:
>
> /* c
"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
> So the question is: should csh/tcsh use setproctitle() or should su be fixed
> to not use "_"?
IMHO: Either change su to use '-' or forget about it.. I don't recall
whether csh/tcsh attribute anything magic to having the leading "-" or
not..
> On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 a
>> printf("CPU: ");
> Look again, the AMD identification can fill cpu_model using cpuid.
>
> The code doesn't appear to have changed lately, so if there is a
> problem it's probably a matter of some processor being incorrectly
> identified as supporting the feature. Or the processor is broken.
> I am quite well aware of the mailing list etiquette. I read through many of
> them frequently.
Then you're aware that cross posts are also strongly frowned upon,
especially on both -current and -hackers. Only one mailing list at a
time please, no cross posts.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send
< said:
> IMHO: Either change su to use '-' or forget about it.. I don't recall
> whether csh/tcsh attribute anything magic to having the leading "-" or
> not..
Same thing as every other shell: a leading `-' means that the shell is
a login shell.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem /
ok/Asmodai wrote:
> -On [19991120 04:01], Byung Yang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >as I see the source code, it is not doing what it is supposed to do.. any
> >suggestions? (it's not a big deal but still it's a bug)
> >I did not modify any of the source codes.
>
&
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Byung Yang wrote:
> I lowered the optimization level from -O6 to -O and now it shows the cpu
> name properly. I was using "-O6 -march=pentium" for the optimization flag
> before, but would it affect the performance of the kernela lot if I lower
> the optimization flag to -O?
ptimization flag to -O?
>
> On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
>
> > -On [19991120 04:01], Byung Yang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >as I see the source code, it is not doing what it is supposed to do.. any
> > >suggestions? (it's not a big
29 matches
Mail list logo
