At 2:33 PM -0400 1999/10/20, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I have been playing for now with RAID 0 to get a sense of various
> performance settings, which can dramatically effect bonnie and iozone
> results. e.g. Write Back vs write through and stripe size. The eventual
> purpose will be for a SQUID serv
Hmm.. well it looks fixed now :)
I think I had an old patch which was being screwy.
(and wpaul fixed sys/socket.h)
---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
Lines 131-134 read ->
#define pseudo_AF_HDRCMPLT 31 /* Used by BPF to not rewrite headers
#define AF_NETGRAPH 32 /* Netgraph sockets */
* in interface output routine
*/
Which doesn't work.
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Peter S. Housel wrote:
> I've been having problems with -current not recognizing my RealTek
> 8029-based PCI Ethernet card. It worked fine in my previous machine
> running -current from July, but neither the late September snapshot
> that I installed on the new machine nor th
Ahh...that is the X86 -current, not the Alpha current...how often are alpha
-currents made?
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> current.freebsd.org
>
> Pull down the file
>
> ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/19991012.tar
>
> (or something similar)
>
> It is a tar file (crea
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, william woods wrote:
> Where is the best place to get -current snapshots from? I am
> running 4.0-19990915-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-19990915-CURRENT #0:
> Mon Oct 18 19:00:56 PDT 1999 and was wondering to get the latest snaps
ftp://current.freebsd.org or see "Staying Current
After much to-ing & fro-ing ealier this year, I ended up using a Realtek on an
otherwise respectable machine. For the most part it seemed alright. Then just
before I went on an extended overseas trip 7 weeks ago, it started doing odd
things. Small transfers worked OK, but larger ones just trick
Where is the best place to get -current snapshots from? I am
running 4.0-19990915-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-19990915-CURRENT #0:
Mon Oct 18 19:00:56 PDT 1999 and was wondering to get the latest snaps
William
--BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GIT d++ s+:+ a C+++ UB+++ P+ L++ E- W++ N+ o+ K
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Peter S. Housel wrote:
> I've been having problems with -current not recognizing my RealTek
> 8029-based PCI Ethernet card. It worked fine in my previous machine
> running -current from July, but neither the late September snapshot
> that I installed on the new machine nor th
[ On Thursday, October 21, Matthew Jacob wrote: ]
>
> Big company. Usual story. Lighten up.
>
'zactly ... we plebes here in the trenches do as much as we can to get the
"suits" to support FreeBSD and Linux (they usually opt for the latter based
solely on how many articles they read about Linux
[ On Thursday, October 21, Bill Paul wrote: ]
> Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, John Reynolds~
> had to walk into mine and say: >
>
> Just in case anyone is wondering, I refuse to create BSD drivers based
> soley on information from Linux drivers. I don't want any damn
I just cvsupped 5 minutes ago, and tried to rebuild my kernel, when this
happened:
culverk:/usr/src/sys/compile/MYKERNEL# make depend
cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
-fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdin
> Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, John Reynolds~
> had to walk into mine and say: >
>
> > A friend just passed this along:
> >
> > http://www.newsalert.com/bin/story?StoryId=Coa6pWbKbyte0mtu
> >
> > Intel PRO/1000 Gigabit support for Linux. Source code too (non-GP
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, John Reynolds~
had to walk into mine and say: >
> A friend just passed this along:
>
> http://www.newsalert.com/bin/story?StoryId=Coa6pWbKbyte0mtu
>
> Intel PRO/1000 Gigabit support for Linux. Source code too (non-GPL'ed very
> much
I've been having problems with -current not recognizing my RealTek
8029-based PCI Ethernet card. It worked fine in my previous machine
running -current from July, but neither the late September snapshot
that I installed on the new machine nor the cvsup version from about a
week ago can configure
Odd you should mention this. I have two cards and a plea from a customer
to port it...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
A friend just passed this along:
http://www.newsalert.com/bin/story?StoryId=Coa6pWbKbyte0mtu
Intel PRO/1000 Gigabit support for Linux. Source code too (non-GPL'ed very
much like a BSD-ish license).
I don't have the technicals to understand how hard it would be to port, but
the code is there
I'm in the process, thank you.
ed
Julian Elischer wrote:
> re-sup
>
> On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Edwin Culp wrote:
>
> > I just saw my log file from this mornings make world.
> >
> > ed
> >
> > cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include
> > -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DPOSIX_MISTAK
re-sup
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Edwin Culp wrote:
> I just saw my log file from this mornings make world.
>
> ed
>
> cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include
> -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DPOSIX_MISTAKE
> -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DYP
> -I/usr/obj/usr/
I just saw my log file from this mornings make world.
ed
cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include
-D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DPOSIX_MISTAKE
-I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DYP
-I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c
/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/gen/getcwd.c -o g
> Luoqi Chen wrote:
> >
> > I compiled a kernel for -stable, but was unable to boot from it. Does anyone
> > know if there is any incompatibility between the -current boot loader and a
> > -stable kernel?
>
> AFAIK, there is no difference between them (the loaders :).
>
> Try from boot2.
>
It
Luoqi Chen wrote:
>
> I compiled a kernel for -stable, but was unable to boot from it. Does anyone
> know if there is any incompatibility between the -current boot loader and a
> -stable kernel?
AFAIK, there is no difference between them (the loaders :).
Try from boot2.
--
Daniel C. Sobral
Mark Huizer wrote:
>
> Huh what?
> I have some trouble building the www site but I will work on that after
> my holiday.
> But the mirror is update every four hours at the moment. Should it be
> every hour? No problem with me
Why not? I don't think it is that big a drain. Once it's up to date it
i have just tried the latest version of aic cam driver by Luoqi, and it
seems that all significant problems were solved.
aic0 at port 0x340-0x35f irq 9 on isa0
...
Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
(probe0:aic0:0:0:0): TEST UNIT READY. CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0
(probe0:aic0:0:0:0): UNIT ATTEN
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> i.e. only for those with small heads..
>
> I just checked in a relatively large set of new files and a few patches.
> The are the 'Netgraph' link layer networking infrastructure.
> They SHOULDN'T cause problems if not compiled in, but
>
> As
i.e. only for those with small heads..
I just checked in a relatively large set of new files and a few patches.
The are the 'Netgraph' link layer networking infrastructure.
They SHOULDN'T cause problems if not compiled in, but
As I write a "make world" is proceding but has not finished yet.
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Brett White wrote:
> Has anyone tried using the 4.0-19991012-CURRENT snapshot?
It's ok here on a K6 and on a dual Pentium III, but it won't even boot on
a notebook with a Mobile Celeron processor.
LLaP
bero
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscrib
> > One common misconception is that cvsup(N+1).FreeBSD.org is somehow
> > less up-to-date than or not as good as cvsup(N).FreeBSD.org. That's
> > not the case at all -- the numbers mean nothing. For example, all 7
> > of the US mirror sites get their updates hourly from the same master
> > site
On 21-Oct-99 Dave J. Boers wrote:
> I've been having strange problems with the ata drivers (again). At seemingly
> random moments "disk contact" seems to be lost. I've been seeing these
> messages before a few weeks ago. The problem is *not* there if I use the wd
> drivers. Also the problem seems
I've been having strange problems with the ata drivers (again). At seemingly
random moments "disk contact" seems to be lost. I've been seeing these
messages before a few weeks ago. The problem is *not* there if I use the wd
drivers. Also the problem seems only to appear after a few days of uptime.
30 matches
Mail list logo
