Stephen Roome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As the title says, is anyone working on support for Athlons, and when can we
> expect it to arrive back in -stable ?
Athlons don't need any special support, they are fully compatible with
Intel's latest processors.
> (I can't find anything in the lat
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Bill Paul wrote:
> install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 mount_nwfs /vol2/release/sbin
> install: mount_nwfs: No such file or directory
Ok, it seems that I found why mount_nwfs failed to build: I'm use
'install' instead of ${INSTALL} in the libncp.
> Can somebody
I was wondering, is there any way to get a call-graph of the startup of
FreeBSD (current) up until, say, the end of signle-user startup? One
annotated with file/line info regarding funciton location? Not a line by
line thing, but function call by function call?
I was wondering if maybe there co
Doing nightly build attempt for 4.0-19991020-CURRENT at Wed Oct 20 02:06:54 CDT 1999
Updating source tree...
? release.out
Making release...
Release build of 4.0-19991020-CURRENT was an abject failure.
[...]
===> sbin/tunefs
install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 tunefs /vol2/release/s
> Luoqi Chen wrote:
> >
> > I've ported it to -stable, but I don't have a machine to test it, please
> > if you could. The code is in http://www.freebsd.org/~luoqi/aic/stable,
> > apply patch files.diff, copy aic_isa.c to i386/isa, the rest goes to dev/aic.
> >
>
> I cannot compile a kernel. It
> As the title says, is anyone working on support for Athlons, and when
> can we expect it to arrive back in -stable ?
>
> (I can't find anything in the latest versions of sys/i386/i386/identcpu.c)
>
> Also, what actually needs to be done, it doesn't look difficult to add
> code to recognise the c
> I also tried to experiment with the aic driver (and also failed, little
> similar to Ilya's problems)
>
Could you download the new set of files and see if it helps?
> as devices. What puzzles me is why the probe at the aic0 wants to look
> at bus 0. Shouldn't that be bus 1? Or should I add a s
> cd0 at aic0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
> cd0: Removable Worm SCSI-2 device
> cd0: 3.300MB/s transfers
> cd0: cd present [1 x 77747 byte records]
^
These numbers don't look right...
> but, unfortunately, scsi probe precedure seems to be relatively
> unstable. _sometimes_ (o
Hello Oliver,
Wednesday, October 20, 1999, 4:12:37 AM, you wrote:
OF> > Chaintech 6BTM mainboard with Celeron 416A processor and 128 Mb of memory
it is just Celeron 333A overclocked up to 416 MHz (5 x 83.5).
Best regards,
Ilyamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsub
Is anyone else playing with the MegaRAID series of controllers ? I just
started testing one out today (My Mylex comes later this week). I noticed
the BIOS is V 1.38 dated June 10 1996. Should I upgrade it ? What have
others tested / used?
I have been playing for now with RAID 0 to get a se
On Sunday, 17 October 1999 at 22:42:51 +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> Hi,
> I got the following crash since a couple of time since upgrading one machine to
> -current as of today. It seems to occurs during somewhat heavier diskaccess.
> Sorry no detailed backtrace for now because I deleted m
On Monday, 18 October 1999 at 0:43:21 +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
>> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 15:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
>> From: Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Michael Reifenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: FreeBSD-Current <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Monday, 18 October 1999 at 1:35:16 +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 12:16:19 +1300
>> From: Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Michael Reifenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: Fre
On Monday, 18 October 1999 at 2:09:49 +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 12:50:04 +1300
>> From: Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Michael Reifenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, FreeBSD-Cu
>
> As the title says, is anyone working on support for Athlons, and when can we
> expect it to arrive back in -stable ?
>
> (I can't find anything in the latest versions of sys/i386/i386/identcpu.c)
You should try looking harder:
CPU: AMD-K7(tm) Processor (499.03-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin =
As the title says, is anyone working on support for Athlons, and when can we
expect it to arrive back in -stable ?
(I can't find anything in the latest versions of sys/i386/i386/identcpu.c)
Also, what actually needs to be done, it doesn't look difficult to add code to
recognise the cpu, what ex
I've rewritten the ISA bus front end code for if_ep and would like to
solicit testers.
ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/patches/if_ep.diff
You'll have to edit sys/i386/isa/isa_compat.h and remove all the
references to epdriver and NEP.
Right now 'wired' devices aren't supported so use
device
Luoqi Chen wrote:
>
> I've ported it to -stable, but I don't have a machine to test it, please
> if you could. The code is in http://www.freebsd.org/~luoqi/aic/stable,
> apply patch files.diff, copy aic_isa.c to i386/isa, the rest goes to dev/aic.
>
I cannot compile a kernel. It reports the fol
> The following patch from Doug Rabson fixed the USB and sound problem for
> me. It has already bee committed to -current.
My AudioPCI card works again. Thanx!
Regards,
Marc
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I also tried to experiment with the aic driver (and also failed, little
similar to Ilya's problems)
Configuration:
Asus P2B-DS motherboard with dual PII-350, 128 Mb of memory, running
4.0-19990918-CURRENT.
Adaptec AIC 7890 on-board U2W SCSI controller.
Adaptec AVA 1505 (AIC 6360Q) isa SCSI contr
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
> > i've tried new "camfied" aic driver today and failed. here is a brief
> > report.
> >
> > results:
> >
> > aic controller was successfully found by the kernel, but after "Waiting 15
> > seconds for SCSI devices to settle" message it said the following
On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 09:56:49AM +1000, Brett White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone tried using the 4.0-19991012-CURRENT snapshot? I
> need to confirm that this snapshot is a "good one" before I
> update my 3.3R installation to it in a last ditch effort to
> compile USB modem support
22 matches
Mail list logo
