"Ilmar S. Habibulin" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>
> > > What hould i do to upgrade to current?
> > You need to install a new loader. cd /sys/boot; make depend && make
> > all install.
> I tried to so, but making new boot loader failedwith an error like 'use of
> unde
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Edwin Culp wrote:
> > I had the same problem yesterday and Matthew Dodd sent me the
> > following fix that worked fine. I recompiled the kernel and am now
> > using it with ed0.
>
> Ok, if someone could test the following patch:
>
> ftp://ftp.jurai
See ed0
When running a current kernel of some days ago, no problems.
Were there perhaps changes in the last days that introduce
this, that some NICs doesn't run ?
Even the xl0 interface didn't run (DMZ). Ping to hosts in
internet didn't succeed.
Copyright (c) 1992-1999 The FreeBSD Project.
Leonard Sitongia wrote:
> At 2:47 PM -0400 10/16/99, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> >On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Leonard Sitongia wrote:
> >> >download the patch, apply it in sys/dev/ed, edit files.i386 and uncomment
> >> >sys/dev/ed/if_ed_pccard.c. Re-config & make.
> >>
> >> I've tried it, and if_ed_pccard
At 2:47 PM -0400 10/16/99, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
>On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Leonard Sitongia wrote:
>> >download the patch, apply it in sys/dev/ed, edit files.i386 and uncomment
>> >sys/dev/ed/if_ed_pccard.c. Re-config & make.
>>
>> I've tried it, and if_ed_pccard.c compiles now (Warner, that address
< said:
> Is there a more elegant way than to get the real adress and
> use inb ?
You need to allocate resources for each distinct, non-contiguous range
of ports separately.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | O Sie
Sorry for the inconvenience, it must have gotten corrupted somehow. It is
fixed now, I just fixed it.
Kenneth Culver
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Leonard Sitongia wrote:
> >download the patch, apply it in sys/dev/ed, edit files.i386 and uncomment
> >sys/dev/ed/if_ed_pccard.c. Re-config & make.
>
> I've tried it, and if_ed_pccard.c compiles now (Warner, that addresses
> the error messages that I recently sent you mail
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Current as of 8. october attached USB, Power Mgmt, sound just fine.
> Current as of today no longer does. Here are the relevant bits of a
> dmesg diff:
I think I broke something with my last change to pci. Could you send me a
verbose dmesg.
--
Doug
At 2:19 PM -0400 10/16/99, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
>On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Edwin Culp wrote:
>> I had the same problem yesterday and Matthew Dodd sent me the
>> following fix that worked fine. I recompiled the kernel and am now
>> using it with ed0.
>
>Ok, if someone could test the following patch:
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Edwin Culp wrote:
> I had the same problem yesterday and Matthew Dodd sent me the
> following fix that worked fine. I recompiled the kernel and am now
> using it with ed0.
Ok, if someone could test the following patch:
ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/patches/if_ed_pccard.d
> If people using laptops with -current aren't going to read their email
> then they should run -current. I suppose I could wrap if_ed_isa.c in the
> same nonesense that if_ed.c uses but I'd rather not as I suspect a fix is
> in the near term future.
NO! Committers shouldn't commit code that is
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> It seems that ed0 is broken. At least two days kernel compilation
> bombs with following messages:
Comment out sys/dev/ed/if_ed_isa.c in sys/i386/conf/files.i386 if you're
going to make a kernel that uses PCCARD. Hopefully the recent changes to
the PCC
Current as of 8. october attached USB, Power Mgmt, sound just fine.
Current as of today no longer does. Here are the relevant bits of a
dmesg diff:
< usb0: on uhci0
< uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
< uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
---
> uhci0: could n
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > What hould i do to upgrade to current?
> You need to install a new loader. cd /sys/boot; make depend && make
> all install.
I tried to so, but making new boot loader failedwith an error like 'use of
undefined type in line 46' in ucontext.h. I do no
Today Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> On [19991016 04:00], jack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Today Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> >> hey If someone did adopt it then it wouldn't be a problem..
> >> if no-on edoes then it can remain 'unsupported'
>
I got 63 bytes also.
ed
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Kenneth Culver wrote:
>
> > For all those who mailed this list about the temperature monitor apps
> > saying that the device wasn't configured, I have a preliminary version of
> > an app that should work for you. I just finished writing it about 10
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> It seems that ed0 is broken. At least two days kernel compilation bombs with
> following messages:
>
> linking kernel
> if_ed_isa.o: In function `ed_isa_probe':
> if_ed_isa.o(.text+0x45): undefined reference to `ed_probe_WD80x3'
> if_ed_isa.o(.text+0x54): undefined referenc
Kenneth Culver wrote:
> For all those who mailed this list about the temperature monitor apps
> saying that the device wasn't configured, I have a preliminary version of
> an app that should work for you. I just finished writing it about 10
> minutes ago, and it only shows temperatures, and only
It seems that ed0 is broken. At least two days kernel compilation bombs with
following messages:
linking kernel
if_ed_isa.o: In function `ed_isa_probe':
if_ed_isa.o(.text+0x45): undefined reference to `ed_probe_WD80x3'
if_ed_isa.o(.text+0x54): undefined reference to `ed_release_resources'
if_ed_i
In message <011801bf159c$f80630e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Patrick Bihan-
Faou" writes:
> Hi,
>
> From: Pierre Beyssac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > There are a _lot_ of pitfalls to this kind of approach, as I have
> > discovered using Linux Debian. This would probably open a can of
> > worms you have n
Anyone know what this is all about ? I'm using ``ftp -pV'' as my
fetch command. Is ftpd on *all* these systems really stupid enough
to time out the control channel when the data channels busy ? Should
ftp be changed so that it does the occasional NOOP ?
>> Attempting to fetch from
>ftp://s
On [19991016 04:00], jack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Today Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>> hey If someone did adopt it then it wouldn't be a problem..
>> if no-on edoes then it can remain 'unsupported'
>
>unsupported != tucked away in the attic, out of reach of
Hi.
I'm in the processing of converting i4b to use newbus calls.
The Teles S0/16.3 card has strange way to spread it's io
adresses. For example if it is configured for 0xd80 it
will use adresses at 0x960, 0x160 and 0x560.
So using for example bus_space_read_1 to read from adress
0x160 will not wo
> I'm using freebsd 3.1 release at one of my PCs. Today i tried to upgrade
> it to current. I read mail-archives and knew, that i had to compile kernel
> first. So i made new config and configured and build kernel. While booting
> loader prints the next error message and boot fails:
>
> /kernel
25 matches
Mail list logo
