Re: maxphys = 0??

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bria >> n F. Feldman" writes: >> >On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: >> > >> >> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> > >> >> > You need to move your sources further forwa

Re: maxphys = 0??

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bria > n F. Feldman" writes: > >On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > > > >> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> > > >> > You need to move your sources further forward. > >> > >> Alas, it didn't help. What versions of what files I sh

PnP problems on install floppy in 4.0-SNAPS from current.freebsd.org

Yes yes.. Long subject, but anyhow.. The problem I am having is that 4.0 insists on detecting my ethernet card PnP at installation even though Id ont want it to.. When it does, it freezes up, and its much easier for me just to input the settings manually info the visual config.. I need to disable

Re: maxphys = 0??

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bria n F. Feldman" writes: >On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > >> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> > >> > You need to move your sources further forward. >> >> Alas, it didn't help. What versions of what files I should have? The >> warnings are still appeari

Re: maxphys = 0??

On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > You need to move your sources further forward. > > Alas, it didn't help. What versions of what files I should have? The > warnings are still appearing, at fsck time. > Alas, similarly I get: changing root device to

staroffice

anyone successful installing staroffice 5.1? is still the best hint? randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

linux emu and quake3test

IT seems that a recent change to the linux emulation code has caused q3 to have problems, whenever I try to go to an internet game, I get a message on the console: usage: ping [server] doing this operation worked fine yesterday. Kenneth Culver =

Re: [Patches avail?] Re: MMAP() in STABLE/CURRENT ...

:>ECC doesn't protect against certain types of motherboard address line :> errors (since although the ECC is correct, the selected address is wrong, so :> thus the data is wrong). There's parity protection on parts of the CPU :> address bus, but I don't believe there is any protection between

Re: {a}sync updates (was Re: make install trick)

:> We're talking about the special case of small root partitions, such that :> softupdates inability to make empty space available quickly can make the :> difference between a major operation's success or failure. :> :> This is almost impossible on a 1.8Gb root partition. : :Again why

Re: {a}sync updates (was Re: make install trick)

> We're talking about the special case of small root partitions, such that > softupdates inability to make empty space available quickly can make the > difference between a major operation's success or failure. > > This is almost impossible on a 1.8Gb root partition. Again why? Wha

Re: identd

Phil 0. Nature wrote: > Has anyone else experienced problems with identd not working? Uh, you'd probably have to be more specific. What identd (pidentd from ports, or something else). What version. In what way doesn't it work. What error messages are being logged. What version of FreeBSD. -curre

RE: {a}sync updates (was Re: make install trick)

> On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 03:15:03PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > > > > There should be fairly few writes to the root partition, so having > > > An opionion. I use the HP workstation model where my / is > 1800M. I have > > > You are not disagreeing with him, David. You are just talking ab

Re: [Patches avail?] Re: MMAP() in STABLE/CURRENT ...

> >On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 10:09:23AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > >> Intel's ECC implementation is not perfect (1), but it's good enough to > >> catch these sorts of problems. > > > >Just as an interesting side note, we had a motherboard which > >supported ECC ram and had ECC ram i

Re: {a}sync updates (was Re: make install trick)

On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 03:15:03PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > > > There should be fairly few writes to the root partition, so having > > An opionion. I use the HP workstation model where my / is 1800M. I have > You are not disagreeing with him, David. You are just talking about >

Re: make install trick

>If you've done your job right, it can be mounted read-only. This > makes it harder for someone to break into the machine and obtain root > access, because now they have to be root to unmount /usr and remount > it read-write, so that they can put their trojan script on there that > they'r

Sv: My status with upgrade from 3.2 to 4.0

> Another thing was > syslogd was looking for /var/log/security and can't find it, how can i fix > this? Just touch /var/log/security syslogd can't/doesn't _create_ files, just _append_ to existing ones. Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"

Re: make install trick

At 3:21 PM -0700 1999/10/7, David O'Brien wrote: > HP and SGI workstations have a single huge /. Why do you > need /usr seperate from / when you aren't diskless (or /usr'less)? If you've done your job right, it can be mounted read-only. This makes it harder for someone t

Re: modules: how to use?

Worked like a charm, thanks...have fxp0 and procfs removed from my kernel config and using modules... On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > Just to confirm, *technically*, I should just have to comment out the > > options PROCFS in my kernel config, reb

Re: Make world broken in doscmd; patch

Philipp Mergenthaler wrote: > the change in src/sys/i386/include/ucontext.h (in struct __mcontext), > where "struct trapframe mc_tf;" was replaced by it's members > broke doscmd. Fixed. Thanks, -- Marcel Moolenaarmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SCC Internetworking & Database

Re: modules: how to use?

The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > Just to confirm, *technically*, I should just have to comment out the > options PROCFS in my kernel config, rebuild and reboot and since procfs > isn't in the kernel, it will look for it as a module? As long as the module is up to date. -- Daniel C. Sobral

Re: [Patches avail?] Re: MMAP() in STABLE/CURRENT ...

>On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 10:09:23AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > >> Intel's ECC implementation is not perfect (1), but it's good enough to >> catch these sorts of problems. > >Just as an interesting side note, we had a motherboard which >supported ECC ram and had ECC ram in it and which

Re: [Patches avail?] Re: MMAP() in STABLE/CURRENT ...

On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 10:09:23AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Intel's ECC implementation is not perfect (1), but it's good enough to > catch these sorts of problems. Just as an interesting side note, we had a motherboard which supported ECC ram and had ECC ram in it and which was cr

Re: shell script trouble

On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote: > There are some of Postfix's daemons running above, but you seem to be > missing: > > root 286 0.0 0.8 872 220 ?? Is 29Sep99 0:10.23 > /usr/local/libexec/postfix/master > > Which is the actual process that listens on port 25. Since