[Bug 248527] dump fails if diskspace over 90% of /usr

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248527 Bug ID: 248527 Summary: dump fails if diskspace over 90% of /usr Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New Severity:

[Bug 248536] periodic(8) /absolute/path/where/basename/contains-hyphens interpreted as options to mail(1)

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248536 Bug ID: 248536 Summary: periodic(8) /absolute/path/where/basename/contains-hyphens interpreted as options to mail(1) Product: Base System Version: CURRENT

[Bug 246356] pcap(3) SEE ALSO contains invalid references

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 p5b2e9...@t-online.de changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |Feedback Timeout

[Bug 245820] /etc/src.conf WITHOUT_OPENSSL=yes fails to build custom 12.1-RELEASE

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245820 p5b2e9...@t-online.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Closed Resolution|-

[Bug 248537] procstat -e/kvm_getenvv() fails for specific processes

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248537 Bug ID: 248537 Summary: procstat -e/kvm_getenvv() fails for specific processes Product: Base System Version: 12.1-RELEASE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 248537] procstat -e/kvm_getenvv() fails for specific processes

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248537 Konstantin Belousov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 248537] procstat -e/kvm_getenvv() fails for specific processes

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248537 --- Comment #2 from Armin Gruner --- (In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #1) Hi Konstantin, thanks for the quick reply and the explanations so far. Howevery, in the particular cases I've mentioned, I still cannot understand that

[Bug 248537] procstat -e/kvm_getenvv() fails for specific processes

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248537 --- Comment #3 from Armin Gruner --- (In reply to Armin Gruner from comment #2) Okay, I think I begin to understand a bit more after thinking about your explanations. Is it that a process after launch did setenv(), **envp had to be reallo

[Bug 246356] pcap(3) SEE ALSO contains invalid references

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 Mateusz Piotrowski <0...@freebsd.org> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||0...@freebsd

[Bug 248537] procstat -e/kvm_getenvv() fails for specific processes

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248537 --- Comment #4 from Konstantin Belousov --- (In reply to Armin Gruner from comment #3) Yes, this is one of the most common cases. I highly doubt that it is a corruption. Just a state which is made internally by libc due to the app request.

Re: [PATCH] script(1): enable proper curses playback

2020-08-08 Thread Soumendra Ganguly
Status: In-progress. On 8/8/20, Soumendra Ganguly wrote: > This has been accepted. Thank you. > > On 8/6/20, Soumendra Ganguly wrote: >> Hi, >>I was wondering if anyone is interested in reviewing this patch: >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248377 >> >> Thank you. >> Soum

[Bug 246050] Buffer overflows in fortune's strfile, unstr and randstr

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246050 --- Comment #4 from Akos Somfai --- Anyone interested in commiting the patch? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list

[Bug 243225] "mpr0: Out of chain frames" boot hang after clang 9.0.1 import (probably timing, not compiler related)

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243225 --- Comment #6 from Terry Kennedy --- (In reply to Terry Kennedy from comment #5) Following up to my own post. I just emailed Warner Losh the following (forgetting that the discussion was also going on in this PR): The system is a Dell