https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240947
Gordon Bergling changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gbergl...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240947
--- Comment #2 from Gordon Bergling ---
This is already fixed in HEAD by rS354399. MFC should be around the beginning
of February.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243153
Bug ID: 243153
Summary: "make buildworld" fails with ..netnatm: No such file
or directory
Product: Base System
Version: 12.1-RELEASE
Hardware: Any
OS:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243094
--- Comment #11 from b.l.ber...@t-online.de ---
(In reply to Jack from comment #10)
It makes little sense to have two different programs for rebooting FreeBSD.
Reasons: Double the effort! And one (shutdown) is developed further and the
othe
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243155
Bug ID: 243155
Summary: Linuxulator: broken fadvise64 for 32-bit applications
on amd64
Product: Base System
Version: 12.1-RELEASE
Hardware: amd64
OS:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240762
Gordon Bergling changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gbergl...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240762
--- Comment #2 from Gordon Bergling ---
I can reproduce this on a recent 12.1-STABLE.
rootaudit 56 Nov 18 18:23 20191118172312.20191118172312.
rootaudit 56 Jan 7 14:44 20200107134414.not_terminated.
My initial directi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232773
edller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||edl...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from edll
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243164
Bug ID: 243164
Summary: blacklistd not handling masks correctly
Product: Base System
Version: 12.1-STABLE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240947
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|ema...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243164
--- Comment #1 from Ed Maste ---
(In reply to Helge Oldach from comment #0)
Indeed, the changes in D22259 are quite minor and I wouldn't expect to see a
difference here. Will try to take a look.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243153
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bro...@freebsd.org,
|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243155
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|emulat...@freebsd.org
--
You are r
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233094
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||243119
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233094
Bug 233094 depends on bug 241374, which changed state.
Bug 241374 Summary: devel/sparc64-binutils: segfault during tinderbox
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241374
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240700
Bug 240700 depends on bug 236724, which changed state.
Bug 236724 Summary: igb(4): Interfaces fail to switch active to inactive state
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236724
What|Removed |
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242828
--- Comment #1 from fehmi noyan isi ---
It appears BSD diff keeps working on the the files even after it knows whether
the files are identical or not.
In diffreg(), which is called by diff() we have [1]
switch (files_differ(f1, f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243164
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243164
--- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer ---
Ah. I wonder if this is it?
459 #define MASK(m) ((uint32_t)~((1 << (32 - (m))) - 1))
460
461 static int
462 conf_amask_eq(const void *v1, const void *v2, size_t len, int mask)
463 {
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243164
--- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer ---
Helge, does this fix the issue?
--- a/contrib/blacklist/bin/conf.c
+++ b/contrib/blacklist/bin/conf.c
@@ -466,7 +466,6 @@ conf_amask_eq(const void *v1, const void *v2, size_t len,
int mask)
uint
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243164
--- Comment #5 from Helge Oldach ---
(In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #3)
> // Above is definitely wrong, only compares the first 1/4 of the address
> // bytes. Maybe that's what we're seeing?
Indeed. That matches with a real-life s
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243164
--- Comment #6 from Helge Oldach ---
(In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #4)
> Helge, does this fix the issue?
Yes it does; we are now seeing a mismatch in case the source and [remote]
addresses are different:
Jan 8 06:06:57 latitude b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243164
--- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer ---
(In reply to Helge Oldach from comment #6)
Thanks for testing it out.
> So it's not a documentation error as I was thinking but indeed a bug.
Yep. Nice find!
> What I still don't understand however i
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243175
Bug ID: 243175
Summary: Several ports pkgs require clang-9.0.1 to build
properly but cc on 11.3-stable is clang-8.0.1
Product: Base System
Version: 11.3-STABLE
Hardwa
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243164
--- Comment #8 from Helge Oldach ---
(In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #7)
> I'm also not exactly in love with the custom file format (with ad-hoc
> C parser and no formal grammar)
Yes, and there are also potential bugs in that hand-r
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243177
Bug ID: 243177
Summary: Enhancement request: O_CREATFIFO flag for open(2)
Product: Base System
Version: 12.0-RELEASE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
26 matches
Mail list logo
