https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235635
--- Comment #4 from Ed Maste ---
What's the version of your X server and drm kmod packages?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220507
--- Comment #2 from Ed Maste ---
See sys/teken/libteken/teken.3:
> The tf_respond() callback is used to respond to device status requests
> commands generated by an application. In the past, there have been
> various security i
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204837
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|kbdcontrol -b does not work |kbdcontrol -b (bell
|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207411
--- Comment #1 from Ed Maste ---
Reporting zeroed or bogus modes has been fixed. The underlying issue (lack of
mode changing support via vidcontrol) still exists, and vidcontrol -i mode now
reports:
% vidcontrol -i mode
mode# flags
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211876
--- Comment #3 from Ed Maste ---
Is this still reproducible for you? I haven't observed this on any of my
hardware.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Save the Date !
Leads Academy Day
https://tr.tdgx.espmp-cufr.net/redirectUrl?GV1=TDGX02U004L5Y000RO9C10&targetUrl=https%3A%2F%2Ftr.tdgx.espmp-cufr.net%2Fmirror%3FGV1%3DTDGX02U004L5Y000RO9C10%26hm%3D999fc1fd341b1247175a336560690ba8&h=d432a003dc91247dbf65522089dcc7eb&linkid=004L5Y_59497148&type=sys
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211876
--- Comment #4 from Kyle Evans ---
Oh yeah, still reproducible... I was trying to track this down the other week,
but ran out of time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239724
--- Comment #4 from Gordon Bergling ---
@Conrad, thanks for your input.
I rethink the current implementation based on your feedback and will come up
with a new patch in a few days. I have seen that ping and ping6 are now merged
together,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25
Mateusz Piotrowski <0...@freebsd.org> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220507
--- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer ---
For what it's worth, I mostly use resizewin with resizable terms under a GUI
environment.
At work, though, I use it with (I guess) sc over serial. So if vt were just to
implement the "small subset of r
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239724
--- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer ---
Gordon, rethinking it over, I don't find the OTP especially objectionable; it
just seems like we could do something better if we're getting into the game of
securing ping. Maybe that is an excessive dem
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210432
Mateusz Piotrowski <0...@freebsd.org> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|0...@freebsd.org |b...@freebs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220344
Mateusz Piotrowski <0...@freebsd.org> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|0...@freebsd.org |b...@freebs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #6 from Dmitri Goutnik ---
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21730
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240710
Bug ID: 240710
Summary: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
Product: Base System
Version: 12.0-RELEASE
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240710
--- Comment #1 from Martin Filla ---
Created attachment 207654
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=207654&action=edit
core.txt.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
Hi There.
Email: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Our international company has around 70 Internet projects related
to crypto currencies and ICO. Now we recruit staff from around the world.
CLICK HERE TO START
Starting salary $798k per year e-workers WANTED.
- No Special Skills Needed
- No Previous W
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240710
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||crash
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228668
Neel Chauhan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
Stat
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230090
Neel Chauhan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
Stat
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240716
Bug ID: 240716
Summary: LD in make.conf is not setting linker
Product: Base System
Version: 12.0-STABLE
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240717
Bug ID: 240717
Summary: Building kernel fails when using linker from llvm
ports
Product: Base System
Version: 12.0-RELEASE
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240716
s...@bsdmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|12.0-STABLE |12.0-RELEASE
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240716
--- Comment #2 from s...@bsdmail.com ---
Just a reminder.
LD is meant to set the linker for everything: kernel, world and ports.
XLD only overrides LD for ports and perhaps custom source code.
The other options for the compiler in make.co
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240716
--- Comment #3 from s...@bsdmail.com ---
This problem is also likely for other FreeBSD versions too. It has been a
problem in earlier 11 releases. So it's likely for production, stable and
current versions.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235635
o...@j.email.ne.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||o...@j.email.ne.jp
--- Comment
26 matches
Mail list logo
