https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237664
o...@j.email.ne.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #204106|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237664
--- Comment #2 from o...@j.email.ne.jp ---
Created attachment 204134
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=204134&action=edit
systat -zarc improved 3
Fixed another style.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237686
Bug ID: 237686
Summary: graphics/drm-fbsd12.0-kmod panic on 12.0-RELEASE-p3
with Radeon R5 230
Product: Base System
Version: 12.0-RELEASE
Hardware: amd64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237686
--- Comment #1 from Torfinn Ingolfsen ---
The panic is repeatable
May 1 02:34:52 kg-core2 kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
May 1 02:34:52 kg-core2 kernel: cpuid = 4; apic id = 04
May 1 02:34:52 kg-core2 kernel: faul
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237686
--- Comment #2 from Torfinn Ingolfsen ---
Created attachment 204142
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=204142&action=edit
/var/crash/core.txt.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237686
--- Comment #3 from Torfinn Ingolfsen ---
The setup / configuration for graphics is
root@kg-core2# grep radeon /etc/rc.conf
# try radeonkms instead
kld_list="/boot/modules/radeonkms.ko"
root@kg-core2# grep syscons /boot/loader.conf
hw.sysco
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237692
Bug ID: 237692
Summary: lld: linking fails on aarch64 with 'Should not have
claimed to be relaxable'
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: arm64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237693
Bug ID: 237693
Summary: ibnd_debug(3) manpage is broken
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects M
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237693
--- Comment #1 from Wolfram Schneider ---
Same problem for the manpages:
ibnd_find_node_dr
ibnd_iter_nodes_type
ibnd_show_progress
ibnd_destroy_fabric
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237694
Bug ID: 237694
Summary: route(8) manpage does not render correctly
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237234
--- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: andrew
Date: Wed May 1 17:12:50 UTC 2019
New revision: 346996
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/346996
Log:
Restore x18 in efi_arch_leave
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237234
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|and...@freebsd.org
Status|N
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237699
Bug ID: 237699
Summary: Hex printing with subr_prf cuts off zero-padded MSB
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237699
--- Comment #1 from cont...@knnspeed.com ---
Terribly sorry, I meant %#016qx%016qx%016qx%016qx.
It is only the format modifier with the # flag that is missing the upper most
0-padded byte/2 nibbles, and it should be very easy to replicate t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237664
o...@j.email.ne.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #204133|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237694
--- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer ---
Manual pages are now formatted with mandoc(1), not nroff(1).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freeb
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237699
--- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer ---
For better or worse, our printf(9) includes the "0x" of '#' in the "width"
specification:
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/master/sys/kern/subr_prf.c#L894
p = ksprintn(nb
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237699
--- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer ---
This seems to match printf(1) (and thus, probably matches our printf(3) too).
Also seems to match Linux.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237699
--- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer ---
I see. Most printf implementations won't truncate the number to fit the
specified width. I.e., %#01x does not truncate 0x10 to 0x0. So that is
probably a bug in our printf(9).
Probably you want %#018
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237699
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237649
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237660
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
--
You are receiv
22 matches
Mail list logo
