https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236710
Bug ID: 236710
Summary: zfs: clone + resize = dataset is busy
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affe
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236710
--- Comment #1 from Andriy Gapon ---
This could be a ZFS<->GEOM interaction indeed.
Maybe related to bug 228384, maybe not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236475
--- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: avg
Date: Fri Mar 22 09:11:46 UTC 2019
New revision: 345410
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/345410
Log:
ZFS vdev_file: use correct value
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236714
Bug ID: 236714
Summary: Clang problem with rctl(8)
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236559
--- Comment #2 from verma...@interia.pl ---
(In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #1)
So shell builtin (ZSH) behaves correctly with POSIX standards.
IMHO FreeBSD should also be correct with POSIX standards so option -L should be
assumed i
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236714
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|toolch...@freebsd.org
--
You are r
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236710
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|f...@freebsd.org
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236559
--- Comment #3 from Mark Johnston ---
(In reply to vermaden from comment #2)
It's mostly a question of whether changing the default will break existing
scripts. sh, bash and zsh use a builtin implementation for pwd, but tcsh in
the base s
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236475
Andriy Gapon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|a...@freebsd.org
Status
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236718
Bug ID: 236718
Summary: system panics with message: vm_fault_hold: fault on
nofault entry, addr: 0
Product: Base System
Version: 12.0-STABLE
Hardware: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236718
lenzi.ser...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|Any |i386
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236718
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||panic
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235944
--- Comment #29 from Ravi Pokala ---
> Thanks Greg! I'll massage it as needed and commit it for you sometime in the
> next few days.
For some very large definitions of "few"... :-/
I've finally circled back around to this, and have a pat
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236513
--- Comment #5 from stockhau...@collogia.de ---
Finally I got time to retest everything with 12.0-RELEASE.
Situation is the same. Only the first CPU can go to C2 state. All other cores
only show up with cx_lowest = C1.
Only difference this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236513
--- Comment #6 from stockhau...@collogia.de ---
Created attachment 203049
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=203049&action=edit
Screenshot dmesg
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236513
--- Comment #7 from stockhau...@collogia.de ---
Just fired up a Fedora 29 on the HP T730.
Running a cpu intensive task and looking at the powertop output I would say
that C2 states are core independent.
Conclusion: Linux kernel detects C
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236513
--- Comment #8 from stockhau...@collogia.de ---
Created attachment 203050
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=203050&action=edit
Fedora powertop
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236513
--- Comment #9 from stockhau...@collogia.de ---
Bug https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189267 shows other
occurences of CPUs where c states for the first core is C1+C2 while all other
cores are C1 only.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236724
Bug ID: 236724
Summary: igbX interfaces fail to switch active to inactive
state
Product: Base System
Version: 12.0-STABLE
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236724
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||IntelNetworking, regression
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199934
--- Comment #4 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: asomers
Date: Sat Mar 23 00:22:30 UTC 2019
New revision: 345429
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/345429
Log:
fusefs: fallback to MKNOD/OP
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199934
Alan Somers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
--- Comment #5 from Alan
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236718
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||mfc-stable11?,
|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236718
--- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak ---
Created attachment 203059
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=203059&action=edit
backtrace
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
24 matches
Mail list logo
