https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222126
Hans Petter Selasky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hsela...@freebsd.org
--- Com
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230144
Bug ID: 230144
Summary: Linux emulator does not work on Ryzen / Epic
processors
Product: Base System
Version: 11.2-STABLE
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230144
--- Comment #1 from p...@twisted.org.uk ---
here what gdb does, if its of any use...
[webadmin@epyc-test ~]$ gdb /compat/linux/bin/bash bash.core
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, co
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118111
Kurt Jaeger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|lifa...@freebsd.org |b...@freebsd.org
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230130
Yuri Victorovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Not A Bug
Status|Ne
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230137
--- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer ---
This is expected on 11.x. The base linker is still the ancient GPL2 ld.bfd
from 2008. I don't think we will switch linkers on stable/11. 12.0 should
have llvm's lld linker, at least on amd64, which ma
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230144
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230144
--- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer ---
By the way, it seems fine on my TR system running CURRENT:
$ sudo mount -t linprocfs linprocfs /compat/linux/proc
$ sudo mount -t linsysfs linsysfs /compat/linux/sys
$ sudo mount -t tmpfs -o rw,mode=177
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230137
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Victorovich ---
Ok, then feel free to close it if this is an expected behavior.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bug
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230144
--- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer ---
I observe that running the process under the debugger immediately segfaults,
although I don't have another non-AMD system with linux compat available to
compare.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230153
Bug ID: 230153
Summary: getrusage(2): getrusage fails to return EFAULT in
32-bit emulation
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230144
--- Comment #5 from p...@twisted.org.uk ---
I did try gdb81 from ports too - that did the same thing.
Am interested that you actually have it working - I haven't tried under
CURRENT, but will as soon as I can on the Epyc boxes. My desktop C
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230144
--- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer ---
I can't test 11.x, sorry. Perhaps bash is affected by the brk bug fixed in
CURRENT at r335702? Or r335516? It's odd to me that you're seeing a behavior
difference between Ryzen and Intel with the exac
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226260
jpicalau+freebsd_bugzi...@elmandria.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpicalau+f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230153
--- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: asomers
Date: Sun Jul 29 18:22:26 UTC 2018
New revision: 336871
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/336871
Log:
getrusage(2): fix return val
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230153
Alan Somers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||mfc-stable11?
Assignee|b..
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230160
Bug ID: 230160
Summary: linuxulator doesn't implement madvise(MADV_DONTNEED)
correctly
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230162
Bug ID: 230162
Summary: mprotect(2): error converting size argument in 32-bit
emulation
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230144
--- Comment #7 from p...@twisted.org.uk ---
(In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #6)
So, I tested 12-CURRENT, and that works fine, so thats good news - however the
original behaviour is still concerning I think.
The issue is not just wit
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230167
Bug ID: 230167
Summary: geom(8) segfaults under 32-bit emulation
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: A
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230168
Bug ID: 230168
Summary: [powerpc] Kernel panic using "options BOOTP_NFS"
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: powerpc
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230168
Sean Bruno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|BootP, PAnic|
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230168
--- Comment #1 from Sean Bruno ---
Full boot console messages:
KDB: debugger backends: ddb
KDB: current backend: ddb
Copyright (c) 1992-2018 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230168
Sean Bruno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[powerpc] Kernel panic |[powerpc] Kernel panic
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230167
Alan Somers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|g...@freebsd.org
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230172
Bug ID: 230172
Summary: FreeBSD 11.2 fails to boot on Celeron J1900 after
upgrade from 11.1
Product: Base System
Version: 11.2-RELEASE
Hardware: amd64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230124
--- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: emaste
Date: Mon Jul 30 00:04:42 UTC 2018
New revision: 336879
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/336879
Log:
Correct typo and whitespace i
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230124
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230137
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ema...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230137
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Victorovich ---
(In reply to Ed Maste from comment #3)
This works, thanks!
One project used -flto, this is how I found this problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230175
Bug ID: 230175
Summary: sched_rr_get_interval(9) fails in 32-bit emulation
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230175
Alan Somers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|k...@freebsd.org
--
You are receivi
33 matches
Mail list logo
