https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219935
--- Comment #14 from Andriy Gapon ---
(In reply to Raimo Niskanen from comment #13)
Maybe there will be another kind of panic from the debug code...
Meanwhile, it seems that my original theory about this panic was wrong.
Could you please pr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219935
Andriy Gapon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.3-STABLE |10.3-RELEASE
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219935
--- Comment #15 from Raimo Niskanen ---
(kgdb) p *mp->mnt_vnodecovered
$2 = {
v_tag = 0x80ea8ace "none",
v_op = 0x8148eb18,
v_data = 0x0,
v_mount = 0x0,
v_nmntvnodes = {
tqe_next = 0xf801d028c588,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191359
--- Comment #9 from Peter Holm ---
(In reply to Siva Mahadevan from comment #8)
Hard for me to say it the original panic is still there.
With the same scenario I see:
panic: MemGuard detected double-free of 0xfe75e000
cpuid = 2
tim
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213155
Martin Waschbüsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|possible kernel regression |possible kernel regression
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219935
--- Comment #16 from Andriy Gapon ---
(In reply to Raimo Niskanen from comment #15)
Okay, I believe that the snapshot problem is already fixed in the newer ZFS
code (e.g. in stable/10, 11.1 and FreeBSD 10.4 betas).
Let's hope that the other
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219935
--- Comment #17 from Raimo Niskanen ---
Does that mean that we now wait for a different panic?
Or should I upgrade the server first?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219935
--- Comment #18 from Andriy Gapon ---
(In reply to Raimo Niskanen from comment #17)
If you can afford to upgrade the system that would be the best. Please
re-apply the debug patch in that case.
Otherwise, we would have to wait for a differ
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219935
--- Comment #19 from Raimo Niskanen ---
Upgrade to what version? (the shorter the better right now)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@fre
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219935
--- Comment #20 from Andriy Gapon ---
(In reply to Raimo Niskanen from comment #19)
Whichever is more comfortable for you. 11.1 or 10.4 beta aka stable/10.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219935
--- Comment #21 from Raimo Niskanen ---
I do not know how to upgrade to stable/10 or 10.4 beta with freebsd-upgrade...
And have locally compiled applications that do not know if I can easily
recompile for 11.1.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221952
Bug ID: 221952
Summary: cam iosched: Fix trim statistics
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Keywords: patch
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221953
Bug ID: 221953
Summary: cam iosched: Limit the quanta default to hz if it's
below 200
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221954
Bug ID: 221954
Summary: cam iosched: Call cam_iosched_limiter_init() after
ios->current is set to the default
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221956
Bug ID: 221956
Summary: cam iosched: Schedule cam_iosched_ticker() quanta
times per second
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221957
Bug ID: 221957
Summary: cam iosched: Add a handler for the quanta sysctl to
enforce valid values
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
O
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221953
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|freebsd-s...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221952
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|freebsd-s...@freebsd.org
--
You ar
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221954
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|freebsd-s...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221957
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@freebsd.org
Assignee
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221956
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@freebsd.org
Assignee
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221350
Thomas Neuber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||th.neu...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221967
Bug ID: 221967
Summary: ixgbe(4) driver for Intel 82598 chip fails to attach
if used 10G-SR SFP+ with message "ix0 attach returned
5"
Product: Base System
V
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221967
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||IntelNetworking
--
You are re
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221967
--- Comment #1 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
Created attachment 185964
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=185964&action=edit
used patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221967
--- Comment #2 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
Forgot to mention, in the loader.conf we have these tunables set, and this
doesn't help:
hw.ixgbe.unsupported_sfp="1"
hw.ix.unsupported_sfp="1"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213137
Ryan Libby changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218206
Ryan Libby changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rli...@freebsd.org
Resolution
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210413
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210415
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198863
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201052
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|capsicum: propagate rights |capsicum: propagate rights
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221970
Bug ID: 221970
Summary: Feature request: Compile -RELEASE with
WITH_HESIOD=true
Product: Base System
Version: 11.1-RELEASE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199075
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bro...@freebsd.org,
|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192971
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
--
You are receiving this
35 matches
Mail list logo
