https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193578
Bug ID: 193578
Summary: Trusted Platform Module driver fails to initialize
Product: Base System
Version: 11.0-CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: Needs Tria
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193579
Bug ID: 193579
Summary: [axge] axge driver issue with tcp checksum offload
with pf nat
Product: Base System
Version: 10.0-STABLE
Hardware: amd64
OS: A
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191545
Edward Tomasz Napierala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org|tr...@freebsd.org
--
Yo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193584
Bug ID: 193584
Summary: [autofs] problem when resolving maps with partial path
matches
Product: Base System
Version: 11.0-CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: An
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193584
Bjoern A. Zeeb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@freebsd.org
Assign
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193488
Josua Grawitter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|amd64 |Any
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193558
Jilles Tjoelker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Triage|Needs MFC
CC|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello, anybody,
earlier this year, I set up FreeBSD 10 on a HP-thinclient on USB-Memory and
CUPS used to
work for me well enough initially as printserver. Until, the dependency to dbus
was
intoduced. Since then a lot of updates, even reinstallation
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192863
pfons...@mpi-sws.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Triage|Issue Resolved
Resol
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156245
Bug 156245 depends on bug 193575, which changed state.
Bug 193575 Summary: [exp-run] Include gssapi_krb5 in base Kerberos
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193575
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193500
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190186
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193500
--- Comment #3 from Ed Maste ---
Can you add a vmstat -i taken while the storm's happening, with / without
hw.drm.msi=0 set
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156245
--- Comment #5 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: gjb
Date: Fri Sep 12 17:06:55 UTC 2014
New revision: 271473
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/271473
Log:
MFC r271284:
Include the gssa
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156245
--- Comment #6 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: gjb
Date: Fri Sep 12 17:07:19 UTC 2014
New revision: 271474
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/271474
Log:
MFC r271284:
Include the gssa
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156245
Glen Barber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Patch Ready |Issue Resolved
Resolution|--
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193363
--- Comment #4 from John Baldwin ---
Ok, I guess the 9.1 kernel did not ship with debug symbols. You can do 'nm -n
/boot/kernel.old9.1/kernel | grep c0aae' which might narrow things down some.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193500
--- Comment #4 from jan.kokemuel...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 147255
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147255&action=edit
output of "vmstat -i" for hw.drm.msi=0/1
With the opregion patch I get the "irq16: uhci
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193465
--- Comment #4 from Adrian Chadd ---
Those two commits (266963/266964) aren't relevant. :P
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193465
--- Comment #5 from Sean Bruno ---
(In reply to Adrian Chadd from comment #4)
> Those two commits (266963/266964) aren't relevant. :P
This should read "I had to revert 269964 and 269963"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191070
biotin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||afg...@yandex.com
--- Comment #2 from bio
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193500
--- Comment #5 from Ed Maste ---
Thanks.
It's odd to me that in both the hw.drm.msi=0 and hw.drm.msi=1 cases exactly 1
MSI is delivered. Could you try disabling msi altogether perhaps, via
hw.pci.enable_msi=0 in the loader?
--
You are r
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193500
--- Comment #6 from jan.kokemuel...@gmail.com ---
OK, then I get:
interrupt total rate
irq1: atkbd0 900 3
irq9: acpi0 3605 13
irq12: psm0
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193593
Bug ID: 193593
Summary: [dtrace] root@test3:/home/adrian/git/norse/dsniff #
dtrace -n 'pid$target:libc*:flockfile:entry {
@[execname, ustack()] = count(); } END { trunc(@, 10);
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193593
Adrian Chadd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|--- |Normal
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193593
--- Comment #1 from Adrian Chadd ---
Grr!
FreeBSD test3 10.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-PRERELEASE #0 r270990M: Tue Sep 2
10:38:43 PDT 2014
adrian@test3:/home/adrian/work/freebsd/stable/10/obj/home/adrian/work/freebsd/stable/10/src/sys/N
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193593
--- Comment #2 from Adrian Chadd ---
And, uselessly:
root@test3:/home/adrian/git/norse/dsniff # gdb762 /usr/sbin/dtrace
./dtrace.core
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.6.2 [GDB v7.6.2 for FreeBSD]
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GP
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193593
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Triage|In Discussion
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193595
Bug ID: 193595
Summary: bsdinstall should enable UEFI booting if booted from
UEFI
Product: Base System
Version: 10.1-BETA1
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193595
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Whitehorn ---
It does this already. Could you provide some more details on your setup?
Are you sure you booted via UEFI? The UEFI memstick image is setup with boot
blocks both for UEFI and BIOS. What is the machd
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193595
--- Comment #2 from Colin Percival ---
In my laptop's BIOS, there is an option of "UEFI boot" or "legacy boot". I set
this to "UEFI boot". I then booted from the UEFI memstick image. When I
rebooted, my laptop wouldn't boot until I set t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193595
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Whitehorn ---
That's really strange. Did you use ZFS or UFS for installation? We don't
support ZFS boot with UEFI.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193595
--- Comment #4 from Colin Percival ---
Aha! That explains it. Yes, I used ZFS.
... if we can't support this for some reason, can we at least have some
warnings?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193595
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Whitehorn ---
The UEFI boot blocks only support UFS. We could just disable the alternative
ZFS installation path on UEFI systems (which uses a separate program) on x86
systems booted via UEFI. There's already some
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193595
--- Comment #6 from Colin Percival ---
I'd say that if machdep.bootmethod is UEFI and the user selects ZFS booting,
they should get a "ZFS booting is not supported on UEFI, your system will be
set up for legacy booting" warning message. Th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193595
Nathan Whitehorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Triage|In Discussion
--- Comment #7 fr
36 matches
Mail list logo
