On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 03/29/12 03:26, Brandon Gooch wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:22 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Synopsis: [patch] snd_hda(4) is in a bad state after suspend/resume cycle
>>>
>>> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->mav
>>> Responsible
On 03/29/12 03:26, Brandon Gooch wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:22 PM, wrote:
Synopsis: [patch] snd_hda(4) is in a bad state after suspend/resume cycle
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->mav
Responsible-Changed-By: eadler
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Mar 25 04:22:54 UTC 2012
Respon
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:22 PM, wrote:
> Synopsis: [patch] snd_hda(4) is in a bad state after suspend/resume cycle
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->mav
> Responsible-Changed-By: eadler
> Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Mar 25 04:22:54 UTC 2012
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> over to ma
Synopsis: [patch] snd_hda(4) is in a bad state after suspend/resume cycle
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->mav
Responsible-Changed-By: eadler
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Mar 25 04:22:54 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
over to maintainer
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=16
>Number: 166382
>Category: kern
>Synopsis: [patch] snd_hda(4) is in a bad state after suspend/resume cycle
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Req
