Synopsis: [patch] /etc/rc.d/named
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: dougb
State-Changed-When: Wed Jan 25 02:52:28 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why:
The named_wait option is working as designed. If you don't
want the behavior, don't enable the option.
Responsible-Changed-From-To:
The following reply was made to PR conf/160960; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Xin Li
To: f...@okbire.ru
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org,
d...@delphij.net
Subject: Re: conf/160960: [patch] /etc/rc.d/named
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:32:10 -0800
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 12/22/11 13:13, Dmitry N Fomin wrote:
> Somebody can confirm this problem and try patch? Thanks.
I'm not quite satisfied with this version of patch -- host command
have its own timeout rules and it's less than optimal when a computer
stays sta
Somebody can confirm this problem and try patch?
Thanks.
--- /usr/src/etc/rc.d/named 2010-12-21 17:09:25.0 +
+++ /usr/src/etc/rc.d/named 2011-09-24 08:55:27.0 +
@@ -100,9 +100,22 @@
make_symlinks
if checkyesno named_wait; then
- until
The following reply was made to PR conf/160960; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Dmitry N Fomin"
To: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: conf/160960: [patch] /etc/rc.d/named
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:13:21 +0300
Somebody can confirm this p
The following reply was made to PR conf/160960; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Dmitry N Fomin"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: conf/160960: [patch] /etc/rc.d/named
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 13:38:51 +0400
The annoying error is corrected.
begin 644 patch_v2.
>Number: 160960
>Category: conf
>Synopsis: [patch] /etc/rc.d/named
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-
