At 11:20 AM -0400 4/29/10, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>I haven't been doing a very good job explaining myself. Maybe someone
>else will (eventually) do a better job. Or whap me in the head for
>being wrong...
>
>Paul Hoffman writes:
>
>> The problem is that many servers in the ports collection (such
I haven't been doing a very good job explaining myself. Maybe someone
else will (eventually) do a better job. Or whap me in the head for
being wrong...
Paul Hoffman writes:
> The problem is that many servers in the ports collection (such as mail access
> programs like qpoper) will only let cl
At 6:34 PM -0400 4/21/10, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>Paul Hoffman writes:
>
>> At 12:31 PM -0400 4/21/10, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>>>Paul Hoffman writes:
>>>
If adduser offers it as a shell, it should be listed in /etc/shells;
otherwise, this kind of error will nail admins.
>>>
>>>This is ex
Paul Hoffman writes:
> At 12:31 PM -0400 4/21/10, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>>Paul Hoffman writes:
>>
>>> If adduser offers it as a shell, it should be listed in /etc/shells;
>>> otherwise, this kind of error will nail admins.
>>
>>This is exactly what nologin is for. I wouldn't want to see all of
The following reply was made to PR conf/145887; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Paul Hoffman
To: Lowell Gilbert
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: conf/145887: /usr/sbin/nologin should be in the default
/etc/shells
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:39:54 -0700
At 12:31 PM -0400 4/21
The following reply was made to PR conf/145887; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Lowell Gilbert
To: Paul Hoffman
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: conf/145887: /usr/sbin/nologin should be in the default /etc/shells
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:31:03 -0400
Paul Hoffman writes
>Number: 145887
>Category: conf
>Synopsis: /usr/sbin/nologin should be in the default /etc/shells
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class:
