The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:37:55 +0200
On 15.01.2013 20:53, Allen
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:53:58 -0500
On 1/15/2013 13:10
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:10:56 +0200
On 15.01.2013 19:09, Allen
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:09:29 -0500
The atacontrol(8) man page
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:35:43 +0200
Please, be my guest to
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:26:43 -0500
Holy crap.
The PR is
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:22:00 -0500
Your solution then is to
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:20:56 +0200
On 15.01.2013 18:03, Allen
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:25:14 +0200
At what point have we
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:03:16 -0500
I'm also extr
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:00:22 -0500
I don't know of a s
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:55:57 +0200
Their on-disk formats are
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:28:53 -0500
Most devices typically
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: Allen Landsidel
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:12:14 +0200
That is clear and I had
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel
To: Alexander Motin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:51:35 -0500
They are not variants in
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Motin
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, landsidel.al...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:46:02 +0200
There could be
16 matches
Mail list logo
