Synopsis: iostat(8) requires an argument to -c option
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->arundel
Responsible-Changed-By: arundel
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Dec 26 21:16:51 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm working on fixing some iostat(8) manual page issues reported by Bruce Evans.
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Alexander Best wrote:
how do you feel about the wording of the vmstat(8) manual? it would be possible
to re-use it for the iostat(8) manual. of course just the -c and -w part.
It's even worse than in iostat(8), mainly due to it being more verbose and
having a similar densi
The following reply was made to PR bin/153012; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Best
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: Re: bin/153012: iostat(8) requires an argument to -c option
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:10:13 +
how do you feel about the wording of the vmstat(8
The following reply was made to PR bin/153012; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bruce Evans
To: Warren Block
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/153012: iostat(8) requires an argument to -c option
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:23:19 +1100 (EST)
On Fri
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Warren Block wrote:
Description:
iostat(8) says:
-cRepeat the display count times. If no repeat count is specified,
the default is infinity.
This used to be correct. It said "if no wait interval is specified, then
the default [for the wait interval] is 1 secon
The following reply was made to PR bin/153012; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Best
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/153012: iostat(8) requires an argument to -c option
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:58:04 +
the wording might need to be changed. what this iostat(8
>Number: 153012
>Category: bin
>Synopsis: iostat(8) requires an argument to -c option
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class:
