On March 2, 2010 02:03:59 pm Remko Lodder wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:56 PM, Rick Chisholm wrote:
> > Thanks for the response.
> >
> > I did not see any PRs specifically mentioning this hardware. I did try
> > to submit a bug report, but the reporting tool gave me an error, after
> > trying a fe
On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:56 PM, Rick Chisholm wrote:
> Thanks for the response.
>
> I did not see any PRs specifically mentioning this hardware. I did try to
> submit a bug report, but the reporting tool gave me an error, after trying a
> few times I gave up.
>
> The hardware in question is a ne
On March 2, 2010 01:49:35 pm Remko Lodder wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Rick Chisholm wrote:
> > Is the BTX loader issue (or issues) being actively pursued? Upon digging
> > through the PR DB I find that I am not alone and I have ordered new
> > hardware to migrate m
(Seagate).
On March 2, 2010 01:49:35 pm Remko Lodder wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Rick Chisholm wrote:
> > Is the BTX loader issue (or issues) being actively pursued? Upon digging
> > through the PR DB I find that I am not alone and I have ordered new
> > hardware
On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Rick Chisholm wrote:
> Is the BTX loader issue (or issues) being actively pursued? Upon digging
> through the PR DB I find that I am not alone and I have ordered new hardware
> to migrate my current workstation to and everything is on hold due to the BTX
Is the BTX loader issue (or issues) being actively pursued? Upon digging
through the PR DB I find that I am not alone and I have ordered new hardware
to migrate my current workstation to and everything is on hold due to the BTX
loader halting.
If the bug has been deemed non-critical and not
