https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284596
Alexander Ziaee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284596
--- Comment #10 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch stable/14 references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=743d6ba0f29045a9a1d087a798520b8e3505205d
commit 743d6ba0f29045a9a1d087a798520b8e3505205d
Author
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284596
--- Comment #9 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=8d4a464412d0bd9f214ecefa2298cbe7f85f2c0f
commit 8d4a464412d0bd9f214ecefa2298cbe7f85f2c0f
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284596
--- Comment #8 from Artem Bunichev ---
(In reply to Maxim Konovalov from comment #6)
Hi Maxim,
Well, yeah, I must agree that it's not that easy to have every thing documented
in the manuals.
And thank you for telling about cscope(1)! Cool
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284596
Artem Bunichev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #257272|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284596
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Konovalov ---
Hi Artem,
While I understand your challenge I don't think that the idea to have all and
every definition described in man pages is a maintainable and viable solution.
Moreover, sometime it is desira
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284596
--- Comment #5 from Konstantin Belousov ---
I remember that the usual wording is "is provided by" not "avaliable via".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284596
--- Comment #4 from Artem Bunichev ---
Created attachment 257272
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=257272&action=edit
tty.4: correct description of header file.
I just found the tcgetwinsize(3) page, where winsize s
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284596
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Belousov ---
(In reply to Artem Bunichev from comment #2)
Again, the headers named with the underscore prefix are private.
If you think that having the definition of the structure exposed to the
man page reade
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284596
--- Comment #2 from Artem Bunichev ---
Thank you for the explanation, Konstantin.
Yes, I agree, this notion would make things clearer. But can't we still also
mention the file where the struct is actually defined? In my opinion, it pretty
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284596
Konstantin Belousov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284596
Bug ID: 284596
Summary: Confused about header file reference in tty(4) man
page.
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
12 matches
Mail list logo